Article published in:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp. 112
Œuvres citées

Œuvres citées

Adams, J.N.
(2007) The regional diversification of Latin 200BC–AD600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, E.
(1952) Sermo humilis. Romanische Forschungen, 64, 304–364.Google Scholar
Banniard, M.
(1992) Viva voce. Communication écrite et communication orale du IVe au IXe siècle en Occident latin. Paris.Google Scholar
Bonnet, M.
(1890) Le latin de Grégoire de Tours. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
Burchfield, R.W.
(1998) The new Fowler’s modern English usage. Oxford.Google Scholar
Callebat, L.
(1967) Sermo cotidianus dans les Métamorphoses d’Apulée. Paris: Caen Université.Google Scholar
Chahoud, A.
(2010) Idiom(s) and literariness in classical literary critisicm. In D.E. Dickey & A. Chahoud (éds.), Colloquial and literary Latin (pp. 42–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K.
(2002) Patterns of variation including change. In D.J.K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (éds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 349–372). Malden (Mass.), Oxford & Carlton (Victoria): Wiley.Google Scholar
Ferri, R., & Probert, P.
(2010) Roman authors on colloquial language. In D. E. Dickey & A. Chahoud (éds.), Colloquial and literary Latin (pp. 12–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, I.
(1983) Traits spécifiques du latin  danubien ». Studii clasice, 21, 67–91.Google Scholar
GRF. = Funaioli H
(1907) Grammaticae Romanae fragmenta, t.1 (seul paru). Lipsiae.Google Scholar
Hagège, C.
(2000) Halte à la mort des langues. Paris: Ed. O. Jacob.Google Scholar
ILBulg = Gerov, B. (1989) Inscriptiones Latinae in Bulgaria repertae, t.1,2: Inscriptiones inter Oescum et Iatrum repertae. Serdicae.Google Scholar
IMS = Inscriptions de la Mésie Supérieure (1976—) Belgrade.Google Scholar
Kaster, R.
(1988) Guardians of language. The Grammarian and society in Late antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, P.. & Halla-aho, H.
(2007) The Pompeian wall inscriptions and the Latin language: A critical reappraisal. Arctos, 41, 31–49.Google Scholar
Leonhardt, J.
(2009) Latein. Geschichte einer Weltsprache. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.
(1969) Saint Augustin et l’augustinisme, 7e édition. Paris.Google Scholar
Müller, R.
(2001) Sprachbewußtsein und Sprachvariation im lateinischen Schrifttum der Antike (Zetemata, 111). München: Beck.Google Scholar
Nedeljković, V.
(2009) The case of ILBulg 248: à la rechèrche des noms perdus. Starinar, 59, 159–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.G.F.
(2011) The Appendix Probi as linguistic evidence: A reassessment. In D.R. Ferri (éd.), The Latin of Roman lexicography (pp. 75–119). Pisa & Roma: Fabrizio Serra.Google Scholar
Quicherat, Thesaurus = L. Quicherat
(1892) Thesaurus poeticus linguae Latinae, 3e édition (par É. Chatelain). Paris.Google Scholar
Reichenkron, G.
(1965) Historische Latein-Altromanische Grammatik, t.1 (seul paru): Einleitung. Das sogenannte Vulgärlatein und das Wesen der Romanisierung. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Woolf, G.
(1996) Monumental writing and the expansion of Roman society in the early empire. The Journal of Roman Studies, 86, 22–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar