Article published in:
Lingvisticæ Investigationes
Vol. 38:1 (2015) ► pp. 133182
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gosselin, Laurent
2015. Séries itératives, phases et agglomérats de procès. Syntaxe et sémantique  16:1  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Œuvres citées

Œuvres citées

Abeillé, A., Doetjes, J., Molendijk, A., & de Swart, H.
(2004) Adverbs and quantification. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics (pp. 185–210). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Allen, J.F.
(1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26(11), 832–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becher, G.
(1996) First order modal temporal logic with generalized intervals. In Proceedings 3rd International workshop on temporal representation and reasoning (TIME’96) (pp. 29–36). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Becher, G., Clérin-Debart, F., & Enjalbert, P.
(2000) A qualitative model for time granularity. Computational Intelligence, 16(2), 137–168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bilhaut, F.
(2006) Analyse automatique de structures discursives. Application à la recherche d’information. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Caen-Basse Normandie.Google Scholar
Borillo, A., Bras, M., Le Draoulec, A., Vieu, L., Molendijk, A., de Swart, H., Verkuyl, K., Co Vet & Vetters, C.
(2004) Tense, connectives and discourse structure. In F. Corblin & H. de Swart (Eds.), Handbook of French semantics (pp. 309–348). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bouchon-Meunier, B.
(1999) La logique Floue. Coll. Que Sais-je, N° 2702, Paris, F: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Carlson, G.N., & Spejewski, B.
(1997) Generic passages. Natural Language Semantics, 5(2), 101–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G.N.
(2005) Generics, habituals, and iteratives. In K. Brown (Ed.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L.
(1976) Givenness, constrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cukierman, D., & Delgrande, J.
(1996) Characterising temporal repetition. In Proceedings 3rd International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME-96) (pp. 80–87). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dik, S.C.
(1989) The theory of Functionnal Grammar I. Dordrecht, NL: Foris.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K.
(2004) A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In B. Partee & H. Kamp (Eds.), Context dependance in the analysis of linguistic meaning, Current research in the semantics/pragmatics interface, 11 (pp. 137–175). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Van Geenhoven, V.
(2005) Atelicity, pluriactionality and adverbial quantification. In H. Verkuyl, H. de Swart, & A. van Hout (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect (pp. 107–124). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
(1972) Figures III. Paris, F: Seuil.Google Scholar
Gosselin, L.
(1996) Sémantique de la temporalité en français. Louvain-la-Neuve, B: Duculot.Google Scholar
Gosselin, L., Mathet, Y., Enjalbert, P., & Becher, G.
(2013) Aspects de l’itération. L’expression de la répétition en français : analyse linguistique et formalisation. Bern, CH: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U.
(1993) From discourse to logic. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E.
(1996) The semantics of determiners. In S. Lappin (Ed.), The handbook of contemporary semantic theory (pp. 41–63). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kleiber, G.
(1987) Du côté de la référence verbale. Les phrases habituelles. Bern, CH: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G.N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G., & Link, G.
(1995) Genericity: An introduction. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, M.
(1995) Focus and the interprétation of generic sentences. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 238–264). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2007) Basic notions of information structure. In C. Fery & M. Krifka (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies of information structure, 6 (pp. 13–55). Potsdam, D: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Kröger, F., et Merz, S.
(2008) Temporal logic and state systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, D: Springer.Google Scholar
Laca, B.
(2006) Pluriactionnalité. In D. Godard, L. Roussarie, & F. Corblin (Eds.), Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique, GDR Sémantique & Modélisation, CNRS. http://​www​.semantique​-gdr​.net​/dico/.Google Scholar
Ladkin, P.
(1996) Time representation: A taxonomy of interval representation. In Proceedings 4th AAAI Conference On Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-86) (pp. 360–366). San Francisco, CA: Morgan-Kaufman.
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lebranchu, J.
(2011) Etude des phénomènes itératifs en langue: Inscription discursive et calcul aspectuo-temporel. Vers un traitement automatisé. Thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Caen-Basse Normandie.Google Scholar
Le Goffic, P.
(1994) Grammaire de la phrase française. Paris, F: Hachette.Google Scholar
Ligozat, G.
(1991) On generalized interval Calculi. In Proceedings 9th AAAI Conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI-91) (pp. 234–240). Cambridge MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
Molendijk, A., & de Swart, H.
(1998) Frequency and tense use in French. Belgian journal of linguistics, 12, 43–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nølke, H.
(2001) Le regard du locuteur 2: Pour une linguistique des traces énonciative. Paris, F: Kimé.Google Scholar
Nute, D.
(2003) Defeasible logic. Lecture notes in computer science, vol. 2543. Amsterdam, NL: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ogihara, T.
(1995) Non-factual before and adverbs of quantification. In M. Simon & T. Galloway (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory V (pp. 273–291). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Payne, T.E.
(1997) Describing morphosyntax: A guide for field linguists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, L., van den Berg, M., & Ahn, D.
(2003) Discourse structure and sentential information structure. An initial proposal. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12(3), 337–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rimell, L.
(2005) Habitual sentences and generic quantification. In V. Chand, A. Kelleher, A.J. Rodríguez, & B. Schmeiser (Eds.), Proceedings 23rd West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 663–676). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Rooth, M.
(1985) Association with focus. PhD Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
(1995) Indefinite, adverbs of quantification, and focus semantics. In G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 265–291). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Association with focus or association with presupposition? In P. Bosch & R. van der Sandt (Eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives (pp. 232–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, S.
(1995) Adverbial quantification over events. Natural Language Semantics, 3(1), 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shoham, Y.
(1988) Reasoning about change: Time and causation from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Swart, H.
(1996) Quantification over time. In J. van der Does & J. van Eijck (Eds.), Quantifiers, logic, and language (pp. 311–336). Stanford, CA: CSLI Lecture Notes.Google Scholar
Thayse, A.
(1988) Approche Logique de l’Intelligence Artificielle. Paris, F: Dunod.Google Scholar
Vogeleer, S.
2006La quantification adverbiale et l’indéfini objet des phrases génériques. Linx 55, 153–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) La lecture habituelle: quantification, atélicité et nombre. Verbum, XXIX(3-4), 259–272.Google Scholar