References

References

Aikhenvald, A. Y.
2004Evidentiality. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
2008Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comer, M., Enghels, R. and Vanderschueren, C.
2016Measuring the Degree of Near-Synonymy of Spanish Verbs of Putting: A Multivariable Corpus Analysis of poner and meter . Functions of Language 23 (3): 279–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornillie, B.
2009Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: On the Close Relationship between Two Different Categories. Functions of Language 16(1): 44–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, S.
2015The Expression of Evidentiality and Epistemicity: Cases of Grammaticalization in Italian and Sicilian. Probus 27: 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 120 ]
Dendale, P. and Tasmowski, L.
2001Introduction: Evidentiality and Related Notions. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (3): 339–348. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diewald, G. and Smirnova, E.
2010Evidentiality in German, Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D.
2006Ways of Intending: Delineating and Structuring near Synonyms. In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, S. Griess and A. Stefanowitsch (eds), 19–56.Google Scholar
Divjal, D.
2010Structuring the Lexicon: A Clustered Model for near-Synonymy. Vol. 43. Berlin: de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D. and Gries, S.
2006Ways of Trying in Russian: Clustering Behavioral Profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2 (1): 29–60.Google Scholar
Edmonds, P. and Hirst, G.
2002Near-Synonymy and Lexical Choice. Computational Linguistics 28 (2): 105–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enghels, R. and Jansegers, M.
2013On the Crosslinguistic Equivalence of Sentir(e) in Romance Languages: A Contrastive Study in Semantics. Linguistics 51(5): 957–991. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enghels, R. and Roegiest, E.
2014Contrasting the Syntax and Semantics of Negative Causation: The Apparent Similarity of Spanish and Portuguese. Languages in Contrast 14(2): 278–305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Etxepare, R.
1997The Grammatical Representation of Speech Events. Maryland: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Fagard, B. and Mardale, A.
2012The Pace of Grammaticalization and the Evolution of Prepositional Systems: Data from Romance. Folia Linguistica 46(2): 303–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faller, M.
2006Evidentiality above and below Speech Acts. Manuscript.Google Scholar
2014Reportative Evidentials and Modal Subordination. Lingua 186–187: 55–67Google Scholar
Freites Barros, F.
2006El marcador de discurso claro: funcionamiento pragmático, metadiscursivo y organizador de la estructura temática. VERBA 33: 261–79.Google Scholar
Glynn, D.
2010Synonymy, Lexical Fields, and Grammatical Constructions: A Study in Usage-Based Cognitive Semantics. Cognitive Foundations of Linguistics Usage Patterns, H. -J. Schmid and S. Handl (eds), 89–118. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gras, P.
2010Gramática de construcciones en interacción. Propuesta de un modelo y aplicación al análisis de estructuras independientes con marcas de subordinación en español. Phd Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Gries, S.
1999Particle Movement: A Cognitive and Functional Approach. Cognitive Linguistics 10: 105–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. and Stefanowitsch, A.
2004aCo-Varying Collexemes in the into Causative. Language, Culture, and Mind, M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds), 225–236. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2004bExtending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-Based Perspective on Alternations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9 (1): 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 121 ]
2010 “Cluster Analysis and the Identification of Collexeme Classes.” Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research, S. Rice and J. Newman (eds), 73–90. Stanford, CA; CSLI.Google Scholar
Grondelaers, S., Geeraerts, D. and Speelman, D.
2007A Case for a Cognitive Corpus Linguistics. Methods in Cognitive Linguistics 18: 149–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernanz, M. L. and Rigau, G.
2006Variación Dialectal y Periferia Izquierda. In Andolin Gogoan: Essays in Honour of Professor Eguzkitza, B. Fernández and I. Laka (eds), 435–52. Bilbao: Servei editorial de la UPV-EHU.Google Scholar
Heylen, K.
2005A Quantitative Corpus Study of German Word Order Variation. Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepser and M. Reis (eds), 241–264. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hill, V.
2007Romanian Adverbs and the Pragmatic Field. The Linguistic Review 24: 61–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Janda, L. and Solovyev, V.
2009What Constructional Profiles Reveal about Synonymy: A Case Study of Russian Words for SADNESS and HAPPINESS. Cognitive Linguistics 20 (2): 367–393.Google Scholar
Jansegers, M.
2017Hacia Un Enfoque Múltiple de La Polisemia: Un Estudio Empírico Del Verbo Multimodal «sentir» Desde Una Perspectiva Sincrónica y Diacrónica. Vol. 407. Walter de Gruyter GmbH and Co KG. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, A.
2014Claro que son Adverbios: Análisis de un proceso de gramaticalización. Master thesis, Universität Wien.Google Scholar
2017From verum to epistemic modality and evidentiality: On the emergence of the Spanish Adv+C construction. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7 (1): 78–111.Google Scholar
Levshina, N.
2015How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Louviere, J., Hensher, D. and Swait, J.
2000Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J.
1977Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, M. A.
1998Los Marcadores Del Discurso Desde El Punto de Vista Gramatical. In Los Marcadores Del Discurso: Teoría y Análisis, M. A. Martín Zorraquino (ed), 19–54. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Matthewson, L.
2015Evidential Restrictions on Epistemic Modals. In Epistemic Indefinites, L. Alonso-Ovalle and P. Menendez-Benito (eds), 141–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J.
2001Subjectivity as an Evidential Dimension in Epistemic Modal Expressions. Journal of Pragmatic 33: 383–400. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Subjectivity in Modality, and Beyond. In Dialogue Studies 25, A. Zuczkowski, R. Bongelli, I. Riccioni, and C. Canestrari (eds), 13–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Ocampo, F.
2006Movement towards Discourse Is Not Grammaticalization: The Evolution of Claro from Adjective to Discourse Particle in Spoken Spanish. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, N. Sagarra and A. Toribio (eds), 308–19. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A.
2006Epistemic Modality and Truth Conditions. Lingua 116 (10): 1688–1702. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 122 ]
Pijpops, D. and Speelman, D.
2016Alternating Argument Constructions of Dutch Psychological Verbs. A Theory-Driven Corpus Investigation. Folia Linguistica: Acta Societatis Linguisticae Europaeae 51 (1): 207–251.Google Scholar
Potts, C.
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramat, P. and Ricca, D.
1994Prototipical Adverbs: On the Scalarity/Radiality of the Notion of ADVERB. Rivista Di Linguistica 6: 289–326.Google Scholar
Regueiro Rodríguez, M.
2010La Sinonimia. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Rice, S. and Newman, J.
2004Aspect in the Making: A Corpus Analysis of English Aspect-Marking Prepositions. Language, Culture and Mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications, M. Achard and S. Kemmer (eds), 313–327. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.
1996Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics. Working Papers in Linguistics Ohio State University Department of Linguistics 49: 91–136.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Ramalle, T. M.
2007El Complementante ‘Que’ Como Marca Enfática En El Texto Periodístico. Revista Electrónica de Lingüística Aplicada 6: 41–53.Google Scholar
2008El Que Como Marca Enfática Discursiva En Adverbios e Interjecciones. In 25 Años de Lingüística Aplicada En España: Hitos y Retos, R. Monroy and A. Sánchez (eds), 811–816. Murcia: EDITUM.Google Scholar
2015A Discourse-Based Approach to Some Uses of the Conjunction Que in Romance Languages. Languages in Contrast 15 (1): 125–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sansiñena Pascual, M. S.
2015The Multiple Functional Load of Que. AnInteractional Approach to Insubordinate Complement Clauses in Spanish. Phd Thesis, KU Leuven.Google Scholar
Simons, M., Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D. and Roberts, C.
2010What Projects and Why. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20: 309–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speelman, D. and Geeraerts, D.
2009Causes for Causatives: The Case of Dutch Doen and Laten. Causal Categories in Discourse and Cognition: 173–204. In Causal Categories in Discourse and Cognition, T. Sanders and E. Sweetser (eds), 173–204. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. and Gries, S.
2003Collostructions: Investigating the Interaction of Words and Constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar