Review published in:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 16:1 (2016) ► pp. 159163
References

References

Biber, D.
1988Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001 Common European framework of reference for languages . Available at http://​www​.coe​.int​/t​/dg4​/linguistic​/source​/Framework​_EN​.pdf
Ellis, N.C.
2002Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(02), 143–188.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. and Paquot, M.
2009The international corpus of learner English, Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.H.
1972On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds), 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.), A. Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.
1980Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G.J.
2011The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguitics, 9(1), 26–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Hermann, J.B., Kaal, A.A., Krennamayr, T. and Pasma, T.
(2010a) Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 747–788. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.J., Dorst, A.G., Herrmann, J.B., Kaal, A.A., Krennamayr, T. and Pasma, T.
(2010b) A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar