Review published In:
Languages in Contrast
Vol. 16:1 (2016) ► pp.159163
References (10)
References
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages. Available at [URL]
Ellis, N. C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(02), 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. and Paquot, M. 2009. The international corpus of learner English, Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. 1972. On communicative competence. In Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, J. B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds), 269–293. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.), A. Ortony (ed.), 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steen, G. J. 2011. The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguitics, 9(1), 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Hermann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennamayr, T. and Pasma, T. 2010a. Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 747–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennamayr, T. and Pasma, T. 2010b. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar