219-7677 10 7500817 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 201611101210 ONIX title feed eng 01 EUR
490008116 03 01 01 JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LIS 28 Eb 15 9789027288165 06 10.1075/lis.28 13 2010009954 DG 002 02 01 LIS 02 0165-7569 Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 28 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Lexical-Semantic Relations</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">Theoretical and practical perspectives</Subtitle> 01 lis.28 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/lis.28 1 B01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim 01 eng 198 viii 188 LAN009000 v.2006 CFG 2 24 JB Subject Scheme LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB Subject Scheme LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 24 JB Subject Scheme TERM.LEX Lexicography 06 01 This collection of articles sketches the complexity of the subject of lexical-semantic relations and addresses semantic, lexicographic and computational issues on an array of meaning relations in different languages. It brings together a variety of linguistic studies on the contextualised construction of synonymy and antonymy in discourse. It shows that research on language and cognition calls for empirical evidence from different sources. This volume demonstrates how the internet, corpus data, as well as psycholinguistic methods contribute profitably to gain insights into the nature of the paradigmatics in actual language use. Furthermore, the volume is concerned with practical and application-oriented research on lexical databases, and it includes explorations of sense-related items in dictionaries from both a text-technological and lexicographic perspective. 04 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/lis.28.png 04 03 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027231383.jpg 04 03 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027231383.tif 06 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/lis.28.hb.png 07 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/lis.28.png 25 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/lis.28.hb.png 27 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/lis.28.hb.png 10 01 JB code lis.28.01pre vii viii 2 Miscellaneous 1 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Preface</TitleText> 10 01 JB code lis.28.02sto 1 4 4 Article 2 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Introduction</TitleText> 1 A01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann 10 01 JB code lis.28.03sto 5 13 9 Article 3 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Lexico-semantic relations in theory and practice</TitleText> 1 A01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann 01 This paper provides a general overview of the treatment of lexico-semantic relations in different fields of research including theoretical and application-oriented disciplines. At the same time, it sketches the development of the descriptions and explanations of sense relations in various approaches as well as some methodologies which have been used to retrieve and analyse paradigmatic patterns. 10 01 JB code lis.28.04wil 15 47 33 Article 4 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Swedish opposites</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">A multi-method approach to &#8216;goodness of antonymy&#8217;</Subtitle> 1 A01 Caroline Willners Willners, Caroline Caroline Willners 2 A01 Carita Paradis Paradis, Carita Carita Paradis 01 This is an investigation of &#8216;goodness of antonym pairings&#8217; in Swedish, which seeks answers to why speakers judge antonyms such as bra-d&#229;lig &#8216;good-bad&#8217; and l&#229;ng-kort &#8216;long-short&#8217; to be better antonyms than, say, dunkel-tydlig &#8216;obscure-clear&#8217; and rask-l&#229;ngsam &#8216;speedy-slow&#8217;. The investigation has two main aims. The first aim is to provide a description of goodness of Swedish antonym pairings based on three different observational techniques: a corpus-driven study, a judgement experiment and an elicitation experiment. The second aim is to evaluate both converging and diverging results on those three indicators and to discuss them in the light of what the results tell us about antonyms in Swedish, and perhaps more importantly, what they tell us about the nature of antonymy in language and thought more generally. 10 01 JB code lis.28.05jon 49 67 19 Article 5 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Using web data to explore lexico-semantic relations</TitleText> 1 A01 Steven Jones Jones, Steven Steven Jones 01 This paper reports on web-as-corpus research that seeks to explain why some semantically opposed word pairs have special status as canonical antonyms (for example: cold-hot), while other pairs do not (icy-scorching, cold-fiery, freezing-hot, etc.). In particular, it reports on the findings of Jones, Paradis, Murphy and Willners (2007), and extends their retrieval procedure to include the previously overlooked &#8216;ancillary&#8217; function of antonymy (Jones 2002). The primary assumptions are that a language&#8217;s most canonical &#8216;opposites&#8217; can be reasonably expected to co-occur with highest fidelity in those constructions associated most closely with the key discourse functions of antonymy, and that, given their low frequency in language, an extremely large corpus is needed in order to identify such patterns of co-occurrence. 10 01 JB code lis.28.06sto 69 94 26 Article 6 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Synonyms in corpus texts</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">Conceptualisation and construction</Subtitle> 1 A01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann 01 Conventional descriptions of synonymous items often concentrate on common semantic traits and the degree of semantic overlap they exhibit. Their aim is to offer classifications of synonymy rather than elucidating ways of establishing contextual meaning equivalence and the cognitive prerequisites for this. Generally, they lack explanations as to how synonymy is construed in actual language use. This paper investigates principles and cognitive devices of synonymy construction as they appear in corpus data, and focuses on questions of how meaning equivalence might be conceptualised by speakers. 10 01 JB code lis.28.07pro 95 114 20 Article 7 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Antonymy relations</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">Typical and atypical cases from the domain of speech act verbs</Subtitle> 1 A01 Kristel Proost Proost, Kristel Kristel Proost 01 Antonymy is a relation of lexical opposition which is generally considered to involve (i) the presence of a scale along which a particular property may be graded, and hence both (ii) gradability of the corresponding lexical items and (iii) typical entailment relations. Like other types of lexical opposites, antonyms typically differ only minimally: while denoting opposing poles on the relevant dimension of difference, they are similar with respect to other components of meaning. This paper presents examples of antonymy from the domain of speech act verbs which either lack some of these typical attributes or show problems in the application of these. It discusses several different proposals for the classification of these atypical examples. 10 01 JB code lis.28.08bel 115 144 30 Article 8 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">An empiricist&#8217;s view of the ontology of lexical-semantic relations</TitleText> <TitlePrefix>An </TitlePrefix> <TitleWithoutPrefix textformat="02">empiricist&#8217;s view of the ontology of lexical-semantic relations</TitleWithoutPrefix> 1 A01 Cyril Belica Belica, Cyril Cyril Belica 2 A01 Holger Keibel Keibel, Holger Holger Keibel 3 A01 Marc Kupietz Kupietz, Marc Marc Kupietz 4 A01 Rainer Perkuhn Perkuhn, Rainer Rainer Perkuhn 01 Taking a usage-based perspective, lexical-semantic relations and other aspects of lexical meaning are characterised as emerging from language use. At the same time, they shape language use and therefore become manifest in corpus data. This paper discusses how this mutual influence can be taken into account in the study of these relations. An empirically driven methodology is proposed that is, as an initial step, based on self-organising clustering of comprehensive collocation profiles. Several examples demonstrate how this methodology may guide linguists in explicating our implicit knowledge of complex semantic structures. Although these example analyses are conducted for written German, the overall methodology is language-independent. 10 01 JB code lis.28.09mul 145 162 18 Article 9 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">The consistency of sense-related items in dictionaries</TitleText> <TitlePrefix>The </TitlePrefix> <TitleWithoutPrefix textformat="02">consistency of sense-related items in dictionaries</TitleWithoutPrefix> <Subtitle textformat="02">Current status, proposals for modelling and applications in lexicographic practice</Subtitle> 1 A01 Carolin Müller-Spitzer Müller-Spitzer, Carolin Carolin Müller-Spitzer 01 Consistency of reference structures is an important issue in lexicography and dictionary research, especially with respect to information on sense-related items. In this paper, the systematic challenges of this area (e.g. &#8216;non-reversed reference&#8217;, bidirectional linking being realised as unidirectional structures) will be outlined, and the problems which can be caused by these challenges for both lexicographers and dictionary users will be discussed. The paper also discusses how text-technological solutions may help to provide support for the consistency of sense-related pairings during the process of compiling a dictionary. 10 01 JB code lis.28.10kun 163 183 21 Article 10 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Lexical-semantic and conceptual relations in GermaNet</TitleText> 1 A01 Claudia Kunze Kunze, Claudia Claudia Kunze 2 A01 Lothar Lemnitzer Lemnitzer, Lothar Lothar Lemnitzer 01 GermaNet is a lexical resource constructed in the style of the Princeton WordNet. Lexical units are grouped in synsets which represent the lexical instantiations of concepts. Relations connect both these synsets and the lexical units. In this paper, we will describe the kinds of relations which have been established in GermaNet as well as the theoretical motivation for their use. 10 01 JB code lis.28.11ind Miscellaneous 11 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Index</TitleText> 02 JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia NL 04 20100623 2010 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027231383 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 jbe-platform.com 09 WORLD 21 01 00 105.00 EUR R 01 00 88.00 GBP Z 01 gen 00 158.00 USD S 598008115 03 01 01 JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code LIS 28 Hb 15 9789027231383 13 2010009954 BB 01 LIS 02 0165-7569 Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 28 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Lexical-Semantic Relations</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">Theoretical and practical perspectives</Subtitle> 01 lis.28 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/lis.28 1 B01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim 01 eng 198 viii 188 LAN009000 v.2006 CFG 2 24 JB Subject Scheme LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB Subject Scheme LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 24 JB Subject Scheme TERM.LEX Lexicography 06 01 This collection of articles sketches the complexity of the subject of lexical-semantic relations and addresses semantic, lexicographic and computational issues on an array of meaning relations in different languages. It brings together a variety of linguistic studies on the contextualised construction of synonymy and antonymy in discourse. It shows that research on language and cognition calls for empirical evidence from different sources. This volume demonstrates how the internet, corpus data, as well as psycholinguistic methods contribute profitably to gain insights into the nature of the paradigmatics in actual language use. Furthermore, the volume is concerned with practical and application-oriented research on lexical databases, and it includes explorations of sense-related items in dictionaries from both a text-technological and lexicographic perspective. 04 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/lis.28.png 04 03 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027231383.jpg 04 03 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027231383.tif 06 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/lis.28.hb.png 07 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/lis.28.png 25 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/lis.28.hb.png 27 09 01 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/lis.28.hb.png 10 01 JB code lis.28.01pre vii viii 2 Miscellaneous 1 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Preface</TitleText> 10 01 JB code lis.28.02sto 1 4 4 Article 2 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Introduction</TitleText> 1 A01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann 10 01 JB code lis.28.03sto 5 13 9 Article 3 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Lexico-semantic relations in theory and practice</TitleText> 1 A01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann 01 This paper provides a general overview of the treatment of lexico-semantic relations in different fields of research including theoretical and application-oriented disciplines. At the same time, it sketches the development of the descriptions and explanations of sense relations in various approaches as well as some methodologies which have been used to retrieve and analyse paradigmatic patterns. 10 01 JB code lis.28.04wil 15 47 33 Article 4 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Swedish opposites</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">A multi-method approach to &#8216;goodness of antonymy&#8217;</Subtitle> 1 A01 Caroline Willners Willners, Caroline Caroline Willners 2 A01 Carita Paradis Paradis, Carita Carita Paradis 01 This is an investigation of &#8216;goodness of antonym pairings&#8217; in Swedish, which seeks answers to why speakers judge antonyms such as bra-d&#229;lig &#8216;good-bad&#8217; and l&#229;ng-kort &#8216;long-short&#8217; to be better antonyms than, say, dunkel-tydlig &#8216;obscure-clear&#8217; and rask-l&#229;ngsam &#8216;speedy-slow&#8217;. The investigation has two main aims. The first aim is to provide a description of goodness of Swedish antonym pairings based on three different observational techniques: a corpus-driven study, a judgement experiment and an elicitation experiment. The second aim is to evaluate both converging and diverging results on those three indicators and to discuss them in the light of what the results tell us about antonyms in Swedish, and perhaps more importantly, what they tell us about the nature of antonymy in language and thought more generally. 10 01 JB code lis.28.05jon 49 67 19 Article 5 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Using web data to explore lexico-semantic relations</TitleText> 1 A01 Steven Jones Jones, Steven Steven Jones 01 This paper reports on web-as-corpus research that seeks to explain why some semantically opposed word pairs have special status as canonical antonyms (for example: cold-hot), while other pairs do not (icy-scorching, cold-fiery, freezing-hot, etc.). In particular, it reports on the findings of Jones, Paradis, Murphy and Willners (2007), and extends their retrieval procedure to include the previously overlooked &#8216;ancillary&#8217; function of antonymy (Jones 2002). The primary assumptions are that a language&#8217;s most canonical &#8216;opposites&#8217; can be reasonably expected to co-occur with highest fidelity in those constructions associated most closely with the key discourse functions of antonymy, and that, given their low frequency in language, an extremely large corpus is needed in order to identify such patterns of co-occurrence. 10 01 JB code lis.28.06sto 69 94 26 Article 6 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Synonyms in corpus texts</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">Conceptualisation and construction</Subtitle> 1 A01 Petra Storjohann Storjohann, Petra Petra Storjohann 01 Conventional descriptions of synonymous items often concentrate on common semantic traits and the degree of semantic overlap they exhibit. Their aim is to offer classifications of synonymy rather than elucidating ways of establishing contextual meaning equivalence and the cognitive prerequisites for this. Generally, they lack explanations as to how synonymy is construed in actual language use. This paper investigates principles and cognitive devices of synonymy construction as they appear in corpus data, and focuses on questions of how meaning equivalence might be conceptualised by speakers. 10 01 JB code lis.28.07pro 95 114 20 Article 7 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Antonymy relations</TitleText> <Subtitle textformat="02">Typical and atypical cases from the domain of speech act verbs</Subtitle> 1 A01 Kristel Proost Proost, Kristel Kristel Proost 01 Antonymy is a relation of lexical opposition which is generally considered to involve (i) the presence of a scale along which a particular property may be graded, and hence both (ii) gradability of the corresponding lexical items and (iii) typical entailment relations. Like other types of lexical opposites, antonyms typically differ only minimally: while denoting opposing poles on the relevant dimension of difference, they are similar with respect to other components of meaning. This paper presents examples of antonymy from the domain of speech act verbs which either lack some of these typical attributes or show problems in the application of these. It discusses several different proposals for the classification of these atypical examples. 10 01 JB code lis.28.08bel 115 144 30 Article 8 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">An empiricist&#8217;s view of the ontology of lexical-semantic relations</TitleText> <TitlePrefix>An </TitlePrefix> <TitleWithoutPrefix textformat="02">empiricist&#8217;s view of the ontology of lexical-semantic relations</TitleWithoutPrefix> 1 A01 Cyril Belica Belica, Cyril Cyril Belica 2 A01 Holger Keibel Keibel, Holger Holger Keibel 3 A01 Marc Kupietz Kupietz, Marc Marc Kupietz 4 A01 Rainer Perkuhn Perkuhn, Rainer Rainer Perkuhn 01 Taking a usage-based perspective, lexical-semantic relations and other aspects of lexical meaning are characterised as emerging from language use. At the same time, they shape language use and therefore become manifest in corpus data. This paper discusses how this mutual influence can be taken into account in the study of these relations. An empirically driven methodology is proposed that is, as an initial step, based on self-organising clustering of comprehensive collocation profiles. Several examples demonstrate how this methodology may guide linguists in explicating our implicit knowledge of complex semantic structures. Although these example analyses are conducted for written German, the overall methodology is language-independent. 10 01 JB code lis.28.09mul 145 162 18 Article 9 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">The consistency of sense-related items in dictionaries</TitleText> <TitlePrefix>The </TitlePrefix> <TitleWithoutPrefix textformat="02">consistency of sense-related items in dictionaries</TitleWithoutPrefix> <Subtitle textformat="02">Current status, proposals for modelling and applications in lexicographic practice</Subtitle> 1 A01 Carolin Müller-Spitzer Müller-Spitzer, Carolin Carolin Müller-Spitzer 01 Consistency of reference structures is an important issue in lexicography and dictionary research, especially with respect to information on sense-related items. In this paper, the systematic challenges of this area (e.g. &#8216;non-reversed reference&#8217;, bidirectional linking being realised as unidirectional structures) will be outlined, and the problems which can be caused by these challenges for both lexicographers and dictionary users will be discussed. The paper also discusses how text-technological solutions may help to provide support for the consistency of sense-related pairings during the process of compiling a dictionary. 10 01 JB code lis.28.10kun 163 183 21 Article 10 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Lexical-semantic and conceptual relations in GermaNet</TitleText> 1 A01 Claudia Kunze Kunze, Claudia Claudia Kunze 2 A01 Lothar Lemnitzer Lemnitzer, Lothar Lothar Lemnitzer 01 GermaNet is a lexical resource constructed in the style of the Princeton WordNet. Lexical units are grouped in synsets which represent the lexical instantiations of concepts. Relations connect both these synsets and the lexical units. In this paper, we will describe the kinds of relations which have been established in GermaNet as well as the theoretical motivation for their use. 10 01 JB code lis.28.11ind Miscellaneous 11 <TitleType>01</TitleType> <TitleText textformat="02">Index</TitleText> 02 JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam/Philadelphia NL 04 20100623 2010 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 01 245 mm 02 164 mm 08 520 gr 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 01 WORLD US CA MX 21 21 24 01 02 JB 1 00 105.00 EUR R 02 02 JB 1 00 111.30 EUR R 01 JB 10 bebc +44 1202 712 934 +44 1202 712 913 sales@bebc.co.uk 03 GB 21 24 02 02 JB 1 00 88.00 GBP Z 01 JB 2 John Benjamins North America +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 01 US CA MX 21 2 24 01 gen 02 JB 1 00 158.00 USD