This chapter investigates how adolescents learning English and Spanish mediated two-way language learning opportunities during their interactions in a language exchange program in one high school. Drawing upon sociocultural theory and interactional ethnography, we examined moment-to-moment discourse to identify language-related episodes (LREs) and discursive moves of social inquiry, solidarity, and support. Findings revealed how adolescent peers mediated each other’s learning using relationship-building discourse. This chapter contributes to interactional research in SLA by revealing how students construct comity in their interactions with peers, and how their discourse may afford opportunities for co-construction of knowledge and second language learning. We consider the pedagogical implications of recognizing social discourse as a tool to expand language learning among peers.
Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599–622.
Aston, G. (1993). Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aston, G. (1998). Introduction. In G. Aston (Ed.), Negotiating service (pp. 1–23). Bologna: Editrice CLUEB.
Ballinger, S., & Lyster, R. (2011). Student and teacher language use in a two-way Spanish/English immersion school. Language Teaching Research, 15, 289–306.
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Breen, M.P. (2001). Overt participation and covert acquisition in the language classroom. In M.P. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 112–140). Harlow, UK: Longman Pearson Education.
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. Modern Language Journal, 95, 401–417.
Castanheira, M.L, Crawford, T., Dixon, C.N, & Green, J.L. (2001). Interactional ethnography: An approach to studying the social construction of literate practices. Linguistics and Education, 11(4), 353–400.
Castanheira, M.L, Green, J., Dixon, C., & Yeagerb, B. (2007). (Re) Formulating identities in the face of fluid modernity: An interactional ethnographic approach. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 172–189.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Corsaro, W.A. (1981). Entering the child’s world: Research strategies for field entry and data collection in a preschool setting. Ethnography and language in educational settings, 117–146.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2005). Negotiating interpersonal meanings in naturalistic classroom discourse: Directives in content-and-language-integrated classrooms. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1275–1293.
Donato, R. (2004). Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284–302.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(s1), 800–819.
Foster, P., & Ohta, A.S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430.
García, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
García Mayo, M.P. (2005). Interactional strategies for interlanguage communication: Do they provide evidence for attention to form? In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 383–405). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gass, W.H. (1985). Habitations of the word: Essays. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Gass, S.M, & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304–315.
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly,43(2), 148–164.
Gumperz, J.J.(Ed.). (1982a). Language and social identity (Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J.J. (1982b). Discourse strategies (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.
Cook-Gumperz, J. (Ed.). (1986). The social construction of literacy (Vol. 3). Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J.J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ivanič, R. (1994). I is for interpersonal: Discoursal construction of writer identities and the teaching of writing. Linguistics and Education, 6(1), 3–15.
Kirkland, D.E. (2009). Standpoints: Researching and teaching English in the digital dimension. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(1), 8–22.
Kowal, M., & Swain, M. (1997). From semantic to syntactic processing: How can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In R. Johnson & M. Swain (Eds.), Immersion Education: International Perspectives (pp. 284–309). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, G.N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Llinares, A., & Pastrana, A. (2013). CLIL students’ communicative functions across activities and educational levels. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(A), 81–92.
Long, M.H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Titchie & T.K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Long, M., & Porter, P. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207–228.
Mackey, A. (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 classrooms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., Gass, S.M, & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback?Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471–497.
Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin-Beltrán, M. (2010). Positioning proficiency: How students and teachers (de)construct language proficiency at school. Linguistics and Education. 21(4), 257–281.
Martin-Beltrán, M. (2013). I don’t feel as embarrassed because we’re all learning: Discursive positioning among adolescents becoming multilingual. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 152–161
Martin-Beltrán, M. (2014). “What do you want to say?” How adolescents use translanguaging to expand learning opportunities. International Multilingual Research Journal, 8(3), 208–230.
Moje, E.B., Ciechanowski, K.M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and Discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70.
Moll, L. (2010). Mobilizing culture, language, and educational practices: Fulfilling the promises of Mendez and Brown. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 451–460.
Naughton, D. (2006). Cooperative strategy training and oral interaction: Enhancing small group communication in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 90(2), 169–184.
Ohta, A.S. (2000). Re-thinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes?Language Learning, 44(3), 493–527.
Philp, J., Walter, S., & Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form?Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279.
Rouhshad, A & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to face and computer-mediated contexts. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sato, M. (2013). Beliefs about peer interaction and peer corrective feedback: Efficacy of classroom intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 611–633.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179.
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (2016). Understanding peer interaction: Research synthesis and directions. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 1–30). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626.
Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation.New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Storch, N. (2002a). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158.
Storch, N. (2002b). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 305–322.
Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17, 95–114.
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.
Swain, M., Brooks, L., & Tocalli-Beller, A. (2002). Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171–185.
Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). “New” mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 820–836.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–37.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3–4), 285–304.
Titscher, S., Wodak, R., Meyer, M., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage
van Lier, L. (1998). The relationship between consciousness, interaction, and language learning. Language Awareness, 7, 128–145.
van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245–259). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Kos, Tomas
2023. Exploring peer support among young learners during regular EFL classroom lessons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 33:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Lehrer, Nadine
2023. The classroom as relationship: experience, interconnectedness, and pathways to critical thought. Food, Culture & Society 26:3 ► pp. 814 ff.
2023. EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research 27:3 ► pp. 689 ff.
Erlam, Rosemary, Jenefer Philp & Diana Feick
2021. Teaching Languages to Adolescent Learners,
Feick, Diana & Antonie Alm
2021. Gruppenarbeit in Zeiten der sozialen Isolation: Zur Nutzung und Wahrnehmung von Breakout-Räumen. Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache 48:5 ► pp. 516 ff.
Kim, Youn-hee
2020. Willingness to engage: the importance of what learners bring to pair work. Language Awareness 29:2 ► pp. 134 ff.
Martin‐Beltrán, Melinda, Andrés A. García & Angélica Montoya‐Ávila
2020. “I Know There's Something Like That in Spanish”: Heritage Language Learners' Multifaceted Interactions with Linguistically Diverse Peers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 530 ff.
Sippel, Lieselotte
2020. German Learners' Beliefs About Peer Interaction and Peer Feedback. Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 53:2 ► pp. 175 ff.
Martin-Beltrán, Melinda, Natalia L. Guzman & Tabitha Kidwell
2019. Building a community of practice to counter the marginalisation of adolescent language learners. Language, Culture and Curriculum 32:2 ► pp. 142 ff.
Peeters, Ward
2019. The peer interaction process on Facebook: a social network analysis of learners’ online conversations. Education and Information Technologies 24:5 ► pp. 3177 ff.
Swain, Merrill & Yuko Watanabe
2019. Languaging: Collaborative Dialogue as a Source of Second Language Learning. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
King, Kendall A., Martha Bigelow & Abdiasis Hirsi
2017. New to School and New to Print: Everyday Peer Interaction Among Adolescent High School Newcomers. International Multilingual Research Journal 11:3 ► pp. 137 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.