Chapter published in:
Cross-theoretical Explorations of Interlocutors and their Individual Differences
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 53] 2020
► pp. 5275
References

References

Adams, R., Nuevo, A. M., & Egi, T.
(2011) Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions? Modern Language Journal, 95, 42–63. Crossref link
Ammar, A.
(2008) Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183–210. Crossref link
Baralt, M., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(2011) Comparing learners' state anxiety during task-based interaction in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Language Teaching Research, 15, 201–229. Crossref link
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y.
(2016) Engagement with the language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–240). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Brown, D.
(2016) The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 20, 436–458. Crossref link
Cohen, A. D.
(2010) Focus on the language learner: Styles, strategies and motivation. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 161–178). London, UK: Hodder Education.
Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C.
Council of Europe
(2001) Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dewaele, J. M., & Furnham, A.
(1999) Extraversion: The unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning, 43, 509–544. Crossref link
Doughty, C., & Pica, T.
(1996) “Information-gap” tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305–325. Crossref link
Eckerth, J.
(2009) Negotiated interaction in the L2 classroom. Language Teaching, 42, 109–130. Crossref link
Ellis, R.
(1997) Theoretical perspectives on interaction and language learning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 3–32). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
(2010) Epilogue: A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 335–349. Crossref link
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R.
(2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368. Crossref link
Foster, P.
(1998) A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–23. Crossref link
Foster, P., & Ohta, A.
(2005) Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 402–430. Crossref link
Gass, S. M.
(2003) Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224–255). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Crossref link
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
(2015) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 175–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gass, S., & Varonis, E.
(1985) Variation in native speaker speech modifications to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37–58. Crossref link
(1986) Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327–351). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Iwashita, N.
(2001) The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in nonnative-nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System, 29, 267–287. Crossref link
Kim, J., & Nassaji, H.
(2017) Incidental focus on form and the role of learner introversion. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 698–718.. Crossref link
Kim, Y.
(2017) Cognitive-interactionist approaches to L2 instruction. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 126–145). London, UK: Routledge. Crossref link
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K.
(2008) The effect of interlocutor proficiency on the collaborative dialogue between Korean as a second language learners. Language Teaching Research, 12, 211–234. Crossref link
Kim, Y., Payant, C., & Pearson, P.
(2015) The intersection of task-based interaction, task complexity, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 549–581. Crossref link
Krashen, S. D.
(1985) The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London, UK: Longman.
Leeser, M. J.
(2004) Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. Crossref link
Li, S.
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 634–654. Crossref link
(2013) The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback, and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97, 634–654. Crossref link
(2017a) Cognitive differences and ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 396–417). London, UK: Routledge. Crossref link
(2017b) The effects of cognitive aptitudes on the process and product of L2 interaction: A synthetic review. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference Research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 41–70). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Loewen, S.
(2011) Focus on form. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language learning and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 576–592). London, UK: Routledge.
(2015) Instructed second language acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. M.
(2006) Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19(1), 1–14. Crossref link
Long, M. H.
(1981) Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 250–278). New York, NY: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
(1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177–193. Crossref link
(1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Long, M. H., & Robinson, P.
(1998) Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Loschky, L.
(1994) Comprehensible input and second language acquisition. What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–323. Crossref link
Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
(2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 265–302. Crossref link
Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M.
(2013) Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms. Language Teaching, 46, 1–40. Crossref link
Mackey, A.
(2007) Introduction: The role of conversational interaction in second language acquisition. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 1–26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2012) Input, interaction, and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mackey, A., Adams, R. J., Stafford, C. A., & Winke, P.
(2010) Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Language Learning, 60, 501–533. Crossref link
Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. M.
(2014) Interactionist approach. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7–23). London: Routledge.
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Leeman, J.
(2003) Interactional input and the incorporation of feedback: An exploration of NS-NNS and NNS-NNS adult and child dyads. Language Learning, 53, 35–66. Crossref link
McDonough, K., & Mackey, A.
(Eds.) (2013) Second language interaction in diverse educational contexts. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Nakatsukasa, K.
(2017) Gender and recasts: Analysis of males’ and females’ L2 development following verbal and gesture-enhanced recasts. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach (pp. 99–119). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Nassaji, H.
(2015) The interactional feedback dimension instructed second language learning. Linking theory, research, and practice. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
Oliver, R.
(2000) Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119–151. Crossref link
(2002) The patterns of negotiation of meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 86, 97–111. Crossref link
Pawlak, M.
(2006) On the incidence and effect of negotiation of form and meaning in group work activities: Contrasting theoretical claims with classroom reality. IATEFL Research News, 18, 31–35.
(2012) Individual differences in language learning and teaching: Achievements, prospects and challenges. In M. Pawlak (Ed.), New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching (pp. xix–xlvi). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Crossref link
(2015, March 21–24). Willingness to communicate as a factor influencing the effectiveness of input-providing and output-prompting oral corrective feedback, presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Toronto, Canada.
(2014) Error correction in the foreign language classroom: Reconsidering the issues. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Crossref link
(2017a) Individual difference variables as mediating influences on success or failure in form-focused instruction. In E. Piechurska-Kuciel, E. Szymańska-Czaplak, & M. Szyszka (Eds.), At the crossroads: Challenges of foreign language learning (pp. 75–92). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Nature. Crossref link
(2017b) Overview of learner individual differences and their mediating effects on the process and outcome of interaction. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference Research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 19–40). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Philp, J.
(2003) Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99–126. Crossref link
(2009) Epilogue: Exploring the intricacies of interaction and language development. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on interaction. Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 254–273). New York, NY: Routledge.
Philp, J., Adams, R., & Iwashita, N.
(2013) Peer interaction and second language learning. London, UK: Routledge. Crossref link
Philp, J., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
(this volume). On the role of the interlocutor in second language development: A cognitive-interactionist approach. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss Ed. Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 19–50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Pica, T.
(2002) Subject-matter content: How does it assist the interactional and linguistic needs of classroom second language learners? Modern Language Journal, 86, 1–19. Crossref link
Pica, T., Holliday, L., Lewis, N., & Morgenthaller, L.
(1989) Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63–90. Crossref link
Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C.
(1987) The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737–758. Crossref link
Porter, P.
(1986) How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200–222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Rassaei, E.
(2015) Recasts, field dependence-independence cognitive style, and L2 development. Language Teaching Research, 19, 499–518. Crossref link
Roberts, L., & Meyer, A.
(2012) Individual differences in second language learning: Introduction. Language Learning, 62 (Supplement 2: Individual differences in second language learning), 1–4.
Ross-Feldman, L.
(2007) Interaction in the L2 classroom: Does gender influence learning opportunities? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 53–77). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sagarra, N., & Abbuhl, R.
(2013) Optimizing the noticing of recasts via computer-delivered feedback: Evidence that oral input enhancement and working memory help second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97, 196–216. Crossref link
Sato, M., & Lyster, R.
(2012) Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practice, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 591–626. Crossref link
Schmidt, R.
(1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158. Crossref link
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
(2006) Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361–392. Crossref link
(2008) Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835–874. Crossref link
(2007) The effect of corrective feedback, language aptitude and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301–322). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Shin, S. Y., Lidster, R., Sabra, S., & Yeager, R.
(2015) The effects of L2 proficiency differences in pairs on idea units in a collaborative text reconstruction task. Language Teaching Research, 20, 366–386. Crossref link
Solon, M.
(2017) Interaction and phonetic form in task completion: An examination of interlocutor effects in learner-learner and learner-heritage speaker interaction. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach. Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 121–147). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A.
(2010) Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14, 355–375. Crossref link
(2013) Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 355–375. Crossref link
Swain, M.
(1985) Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
(2005) The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471–483). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N.
(2016) Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10, 30–45.
Toth, P. D.
(2008) Teacher- and learner-based discourse in task-based grammar instruction: Providing procedural assistance for L2 morphosyntactic development. Language Learning, 58, 237–283. Crossref link
Yule, G., & McDonald, D.
(1990) Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539–56. Crossref link