Chapter published in:
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 326
References

References

Arfé, B.
(2012) Looking into the text generation box to find the psycholinguistic (cognitive-language) writing processes. In V. W. Beninger, (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 573–578). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R.
(2019) Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702–726. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J.
(2012) A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348–363. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) The intersection between SLA and feedback research. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing. Contexts and issues (pp. 85–105). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Storch, N.
(2016) Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(Ed.) (2013) Writing as meaning-making. Teaching to mean. Special Issue, Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2).Google Scholar
(2014) Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 237–263). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M.
(2014a) Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing: An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(Eds.) (2014b) Task-based language learning- Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caras, A.
(2019) Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188–200). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F.
(2019) What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.
(2018) Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2018) Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1989) Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Expertise in evaluating second language compositions. Language Testing, 7, 31–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Preface. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. ix–xii). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ferris, D., & Kurzer, K.
(2019) Does error feedback help L2 writers? Latest evidence on the efficacy of written corrective feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing. Contexts and issues (pp. 106–124). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.
(1997) Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Harklau, L.
(2002) The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 329–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, J.
(2012) Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F.
(2019a) Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing. Contexts and issues (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. & F. Hyland
(Eds.) (2019b) Feedback in second language writing. Contexts and issues. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kang, E., & Han, Z.
(2015) The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J.
(2012) The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403.Google Scholar
(2014) Differences across modalities of performance: An investigation of linguistic and discourse complexity in narrative tasks. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 193–217). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A.
(2012) The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S., & Roshan, S.
(2019) The associations between working memory and the effects of four different types of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 1–15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., & Brown, D.
(2015) Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J. & Manchón, R. M.
(2019) Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 503–527.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(Ed.) (2009) Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
(2011a) Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchόn, R. M.
(2011b) Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchόn (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to learn in an additional language (pp. 51–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(2012) L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2017) The potential impact of multimodal composition on language learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 94–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J.
(2007) Writing-to-learn in instructed language learning contexts. In E. A. Soler & M. P. S. Jordá (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 101–121). Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing: Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 102–129). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Tardy, C.
(2012) From the Editors. Exploring L2 writing-SLA interfaces. Special issue in the Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), v .Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O.
(2019) Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. B. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 341–362). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J.
(2016) L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M.
(2019) The role of working memory in young second language learners’ written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 31–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2012) Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 404–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C.
(2012) The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M.
(2017) Investigating IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. IELTS Research Reports Online Series, 44.Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J.
(2013) Second language writing as a psycholinguistic locus for L2 production and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(4), 444–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2007) The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanou, C., & Révész, A.
(2015) Direct written corrective feedback, learner differences, and the acquisition of second language article use for generic and specific plural reference. Modern Language Journal, 99(2), 263–282. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N.
(2013) Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Collaborative writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 387–406). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Collaborative writing. In J. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tavakoli, P.
(2014) Storyline complexity and syntactic complexity in writing and speaking tasks. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 217–236). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchón, R. M.
(2017) The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning, 67(2), 394–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Differential contribution of oral and written modes to lexical, syntactic and propositional complexity in L2 performance in instructed contexts. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 206–227. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.
(2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y., Sun, Y., Chang, P., & Li, Y.
(2019) Exploring the relationship between language aptitude, vocabulary size, and EFL graduate students’ L2 writing performance. TESOL Quarterly, 53(3), 845–856. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zabihi, R.
(2018) The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J.
(2017) ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar