Chapter published in:
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 7394
References

References

Berman, R. A., & Verhoeven, L.
(2002) Cross-linguistic perspectives on the development of text-production abilities: Speech and writing. Written Language and Literacy, 5, 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biesta, G.
(2010) Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.), Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 5–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G.
(2014) Complexity theory and the social sciences. The state of the art. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H.
(2002) The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate FL curriculum. Language Testing, 19, 419–437. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Emergent L2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20, 50–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2012) Conceptualizing FL writing development in collegiate settings: A genre-based systemic functional linguistic approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 190–218). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2014) Linking task and writing for language development: Evidence from a genre-based curricular approach. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 237–263). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2015) Linking ‘task’ and curricular thinking: An affirmation of the TBLT educational agenda. In M. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp. 193–224). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Meeting the challenge of instructed language development. Reflections on systemic-functional contributions. In S. Neumann, R. Wegener, J. Fest, P. Niemietz, & N. Hützen (Eds.), Challenging boundaries in linguistics: Systemic functional perspectives (pp. 457–491). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2019) Affirming the context of instructed SLA: The potential of curricular thinking. Language Teaching Research, 23, 176–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020a) Developing an SFL-inspired 4-year collegiate foreign language program: Contexts, constructs, curriculum. In J. R. Martin, J. S. Knox, & D. Caldwell (Eds.), Developing theory: A handbook in appliable linguistics and semiotics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
(2020b) Envisioning writing development in CDST under a curricular optic: A proposal. In G. G. Fogal & M. Verspoor (Eds.), Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 writing development (pp. 243–272). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, H., & Manchón, R. M.
(2014a) Task, task performance, and writing development: Advancing the constructs and the research agenda. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 267–299). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2014b) Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing: An introduction. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Byrnes, H., Maxim, H. H., & Norris, J. M.
(2010) Realizing advanced foreign language writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Modern Language Journal, 94(Supplement s-1), iv–vi, 1–235.Google Scholar
Christie, F.
(2012) Language education throughout the school years: A functional perspective. Language Learning, 62(Supplement 1).Google Scholar
Cilliers, P.
(2001) Boundaries, hierarchies, and networks in complex systems. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5, 135–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coffin, C.
(2006) Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Craik, F. I. M.
(2002) Levels of processing: past, present, and ... future? Memory, 10, 305–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cumming, A.
(1990) Metalinguistic and ideational thinking in second language composing. Written Communication, 7, 482–511. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Theoretical orientations in L2 writing. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 65–88). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2014) Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modeling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47, 80–91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emig, J.
(1977) Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1973) Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1978) Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
(1993) Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) The notion of “context” in language education. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics (pp. 1–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) Spoken and written modes of meaning. In J. J. Webster (Ed.), On grammar (Vol. 1, pp. 323–351). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2004) Things and relations: Regrammaticising experience as technical knowledge (1998). In J. J. Webster (Ed.), The language of science (Vol. 5, pp. 49–101). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
(2008) Complementarities in language. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(1999) Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., revised by Matthiessen, C. M. I. M.
(2014) Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. H.
(2011) Language proficiency in native and nonnative speakers. An agenda for research and suggestions for second-language assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8, 229–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D.
(2011) A complexity theory approach to second language development/acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 48–72). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
(2017) Complexity theory: The lessons continue. In L. Ortega & Z. Han (Eds.), Complexity theory and language development: In celebration of Diane Larsen-Freeman (pp. 11–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2019) From ISLA > ISLA > ILL: A curricular perspective. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 485–493). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P., & Cerezo, L.
(2016) Deconstructing the “I” and “SLA” in ISLA: One curricular approach. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6, 43–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M.
(2019) Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 503–527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macaro, E.
(2014) Reframing task performance: The relationship between tasks, strategic behaviour, and linguistic knowledge in writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning – Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 53–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(2009) Introduction: Broadening the perspective of L2 writing scholarship: The contribution of research on foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 1–19). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language (pp. 61–82). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L.
(2009) The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 102–124). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D.
(2005) Genre relations. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Manchón, R. M.
(2012) Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 219–245). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osberg, D.
(2008) The logic of emergence: An alternative conceptual space for theorizing critical education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 6, 133–161.Google Scholar
Preiser, R., & Cilliers, P.
(2010) Unpacking the ethics of complexity: Concluding reflections. In P. Cilliers & R. Preiser (Eds.) Complexity, difference and identity: An ethical perspective (pp. 265–287). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J.
(2013) Second language writing as a psycholinguistic locus for L2 production and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 444–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Nicolás-Conesa, F., & Coyle, Y.
(2016) Focus on writers and processes. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language learning (pp. 267–286). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M.
(2011) Developmental changes in the use of interactional resources. Persuading the reader in FL book reviews. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 243–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, M., & Byrnes, H.
(2013) Writing as learning to know: Tracing knowledge construction in L2 German compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 179–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schleppegrell, M. J.
(2004) The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
(1995) Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate. A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371–391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H.
(2014) The good, the bad and the ugly? The dynamic interplay between educational practice, policy and research. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 11(2), 22–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.
(1986) Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R., Llinares, A., & McCabe, A.
(2011) Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research, 15, 343–362. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Witte, S. P.
(1987) Pre-text and composing. College Composition and Communication, 38, 397–425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar