Chapter published in:
Writing and Language Learning: Advancing research agendas
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón
[Language Learning & Language Teaching 56] 2020
► pp. 207230
Adams, R.
(2006) L2 tasks and orientation to form. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 152, 7–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., & Ross-Feldman, L.
(2008) Does writing influence learner attention to form? In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.), The oral-literate connection: Perspectives on L2 speaking, writing, and other media interactions (pp. 243–266). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F.
(2002) Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baralt, M.
(2013) The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cho, M.
(2018) Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. Modern Language Journal, 102, 162–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J.
(2006) Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 185–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
(2017) Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gilabert, R., Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, L.
(2016) Mode in theoretical and empirical TBLT research: Advancing research agendas. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 117–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M.
(2001) Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A Meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Baralt, M.
(2014) Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in FTF and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) Does type of modified output correspond to learner noticing of feedback? A closer look in face-to-face and computer-mediated task-based interaction. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1393–1420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izumi, S.
(2002) Output, input enhancement, and the Noticing Hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, R. T.
(1996) A model of working memory in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A.
(2012) The role of task complexity, modality, and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62, 439–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
(2012) Speaking and writing tasks and their effects on second language performance. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 364–377). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lai, C., & Zhao, Y.
(2006) Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 102–120.Google Scholar
Laver, J.
(1994) Principles of phonetics. Cambridge, MA: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeman, J.
(2003) Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leow, R. P.
(2015) Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W.
(1989) Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar
Liceras, J., Maxwell, D., Laguardia, B., Fernández, Z., Fernández, R., & Díaz, L.
(1997) A longitudinal study of Spanish non-native grammars: Beyond parameters. In A. T. Pérez-Leroux & W. R. Glass (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the acquisition of Spanish, Vol. 1: Developing grammars (pp. 99–132). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M.
(2014) The internal dimension of tasks: The interaction between task factors and learner factors in bringing about learning through writing. In H. Byrnes & R. M. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based language learning. Insights from and for L2 writing (pp. 27–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2004) Learner-learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32, 207–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B.
(1990) Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niu, R.
(2009) Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners’ focus on form. Language Awareness, 18, 384–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L.
(2012) Epilogue: Exploring L2 writing–SLA interfaces. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 404–415. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L., & Long, M. H.
(1997) The effects of models and recasts on the acquisition of object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 65–86.Google Scholar
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
(2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878–912. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Gilabert, R.
(2016) Measuring cognitive task demands using dual-task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgments: A validation study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 703–737. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riazi, A. M.
(2016) Innovative mixed-methods research: Moving beyond design technicalities to epistemological and methodological realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37, 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P.
(2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) The Cognition Hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(Spring), 45–105. University of Hawaii, Dept. of Second Language Studies.Google Scholar
Rouhshad, A., Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N.
(2016) The nature of negotiations in face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication in pair interactions. Language Teaching Research, 20, 514–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sagarra, N., & Abbuhl, R.
(2013) Optimizing the noticing of recasts via computer-delivered feedback: Evidence that oral input enhancement and working memory help second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 97, 196–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sasayama, S.
(2016) Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 100, 231–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(2001) Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheen, Y.
(2010) Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 203–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P.
(1996) A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(1984) Learners’ comprehension of clitic pronouns: More evidence for a word order strategy. Hispanic Linguistics, 1, 57–68.Google Scholar
Vasylets, O., Gilabert, R., & Manchón, R. M.
(2017) The effects of mode and task complexity on second language production. Language Learning, 67, 394–430. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.
(2012) The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y.
(2012) The relative effects of explicit correction and recasts on two target structures via two communication modes. Language Learning, 62, 1134–1169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Yuksel, D.
(2011) Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15, 457–477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yuksel, D., & Inan, B.
(2014) The effects of communication mode on negotiation of meaning and its noticing. ReCALL, 26, 333–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zalbidea, J.
(2017) ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. Modern Language Journal, 101, 335–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Output, task modality, and target form salience in learner noticing of form and L2 development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ziegler, N.
(2017) Task modality, noticing, and the contingency of recasts: Insights on salience from multiple modalities. In S. M. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp. 269–290). New York, NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar