Article published In:
Language Problems and Language PlanningVol. 39:2 (2015) ► pp.171–186
Learner agency in language planning
A tripartite perspective
The role of language teacher agency in language policy and planning (LPP) enactment and implementation at the micro-level has received increasing treatment in the literature. Under-addressed in this context, however, is the role of the learner and the extent to which learner activity can be agentive. Seeking to redress this situation, this paper focusses on learner agency in LPP. After establishing a general ecology of language context, issues related to the problematic concept of ‘agency’ are addressed. This discussion draws upon poststructuralist critiques as well as the insights of sociocultural theory. A poststructuralist perspective provides a broad philosophical base for problematizing learner agency and supplies a critique of the limited structuralist approach characteristic of traditional LPP. A sociocultural lens supplies a more concrete conceptualization of how agentive learner activity operates interactively with teacher agency. The final section of the paper focusses on ethnography as a research methodology; ethnographic research yields qualitative data on learner agency that can be drawn upon in micro planning and policy-making. A relevant case study employing ethnographic methodology is discussed. The conclusion is that learner agency should be given more prominence in LPP research and literature.
Keywords: language planning, poststructuralism, sociocultural theory, ethnography, agency
References (53)
Ahearn, L.M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 301, 109–137. 
. (2012). Living language: An introduction to linguistic anthropology. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Baldauf, R.B., Jr. (1993). Unplanned” language policy and planning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 141, 82–89.
. (2006). Rearticulating the case of micro language planning in a language ecology context. Current Issues in Language Planning, 7(2-3), 147–170.
Blommaert, J. (1996). Language planning as a discourse on language and society: The linguistic ideology of a scholarly tradition. Language Problems and Language Planning, 20 (3), 199–222.
Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
Caldwell, R. (2007). Agency and change: Re-evaluating Foucault’s legacy. Organization, 14(6), 769–791.
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene. London: Routledge.
Canagarajah, A.S. (2006). Ethnographic methods in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy (pp. 153–169). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
. (2007). The ecology of global English. International Multilingual Research Journal, 1(2), 89–100.
De Costa, P.I. (2010). Language ideologies and Standard English language policy in Singapore: Responses of a ‘designer immigrant’ student. Language Policy, 9(3), 217–239.
Cross, R. (2009). A sociocultural framework for language policy and planning. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33 (1), 22–42.
Deleuze, G. (1994) Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press. Original work published 1968.
Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eggington, W. (2010). Unplanned language planning. In R.B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 452–262). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishman, J.A. (1994). Critiques of language planning: A minority language perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15 (2-3), 91–99.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, vol. 11. New York: Random House. Originally published 1978.
. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Gubrium, J.F., & Holstein, J.A. (1995). Individual agency, the ordinary, and postmodern life. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 555–570.
Haugen, E. (1971). The ecology of language. The Linguistic Reporter Supplement 251, 19–26.
Heller, M. (1999). Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography. London: Longman.
Hornberger, N.H. (2002). Multilingual language policies and the continua of biliteracy: An ecological approach. Language Policy 1 (1), 27–51
Hornberger, N.H., & Johnson, D.C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.
Johnson, D.C. (2013). Language policy. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lantolf, J.P. & Thorne, S.L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinas, E. (1998). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. Original work published 1974.
Lo Bianco, J. (2004). Language planning as applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 738–762). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Miller, E.R. (2010). Agency in the making: Adult immigrants’ accounts of language learning and work. TESOL Quarterly, 44(3), 465–487.
Nietzsche, F. (1989). On the genealogy of morals and ecce homo. New York: Vintage.
Norton, B. (1997). Language, identity, and the ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 409–429.
Norton, B., & Toohey, K. (2011). Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44(4), 412–446.
O Laoire, M., Rigg, C., & Georgiou, V. (2011). Subaltern agency and language education policy: Implementing a language policy for on the ground. Apples - Applied Language Studies, 5(3), 19–32.
Pennycook, A. (2004). Language policy and the ecological turn. Language Policy 31, 213–239.
. (2006). Postmodernism in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy (pp. 60–76). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
. (2010). Language as a local practice. London: Routledge.
Phillipson, R. & Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1996). English only worldwide or language ecology? TESOL Quarterly 30 (3), 429–452.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Poehner, M. & Lantolf, J.P. (2010). Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education: The case for dynamic assessment. Mind Culture and Activity, 17(4), 312–330.
Ramanathan, V. (2005). Rethinking language planning and policy from the ground up: Refashioning institutional realities and human lives. Current Issues in Language Planning, 6(2), 89–101.
Ramanathan, V., & Morgan, B. (2007). TESOL and policy enactments: Perspectives from practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 447–463.
Richardson, F.C., Rogers, A., & McCarroll, J. (1998). Toward a dialogical self. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(4), 496–515.
Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4 (2), 196–213.
Ricento, T.K., & Hornberger, N.H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.
Ros i. Sole, C. (2007). Language learners’ sociocultural positions in the L2: A narrative approach. Language and Intercultural Communication, 7(3), 203–216.
Shohamy, E. (2009). Language policy as experiences. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33(2), 185–189.
Shouhui, Z., & Baldauf, R.B. (2012). Individual agency in language planning: Chinese script reform as a case study. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(1), 1–24.
Siekmann, S. & Charles, W. (2011). Upingakuneng (When they are ready): Dynamic assessment in a third semester Yugtun class. Assessment in Education: Principles Policy and Practice 18(2) 151–168.
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, D. (2000). The return of the subject? Power, reflexivity and agency. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 26(5), 109–122.
Tarnopolsky, O. & Goodman, B. (2012). Language practices and attitudes in EFL and English-medium classes at a university in eastern Ukraine. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 27 (2), 57–75.
Tollefson, J.W. (2010). Perspectives on language policy and planning. In R.B. Kaplan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of applied linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 463–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Widin, J. & Yasukawa, K. (2013). Re-imagining citizenship: Views from the classroom. In V. Ramanathan (Ed.), Language policies and (dis)citizenship (pp. 167–187). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Chen, Lin & Danping Wang
2024. Micro language planning in Mandarin-dominated Chinese language education: voices from dialect-background heritage learners in New Zealand. Current Issues in Language Planning 25:2 ► pp. 157 ff. 
Savski, Kristof
2024. Language policy from textuality to (re)entextualization: expanding the toolkit for discursive analyses. Language Policy 23:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
Lu, Juexuan & Qi Shen
2022. Understanding China’s LOTE learners’ perceptions and choices of LOTE(s) and English learning: a linguistic market perspective. Current Issues in Language Planning 23:4 ► pp. 394 ff.
Finardi, Kyria Rebeca & Felipe Furtado Guimarães
2021. Local agency in national language policies: the internationalisation of higher education in a Brazilian institution. Current Issues in Language Planning 22:1-2 ► pp. 157 ff.
Goodman, Bridget
2018. Acts of Negotiation: Governmentality and Medium of Instruction in an Eastern Ukrainian University. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 49:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
Brown, Jeffrey
2017. Beyond the World Englishes Paradigm: Agency, Performativity and Malaysian English. English Today 33:3 ► pp. 54 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.