Part of
Language, Literacy, and Learning in STEM Education: Research Methods and Perspectives from Applied LinguisticsEdited by Mary Jane Curry and David I. Hanauer
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 1] 2014
► pp. 167–178
Edited by Mary Jane Curry and David I. Hanauer
[Language Studies, Science and Engineering 1] 2014
► pp. 167–178
Chapter 10. Facilitating STEM education through interdisciplinarity
Funding, science, and applied linguistics
There is increasing pressure for STEM education to reform in the direction of student-centered learning approaches, active learning, interdisciplinarity, and data-driven evaluations and assessments of student learning. These requirements derive from the need for STEM education to facilitate economic development, national health, technological innovation, and appropriate demographic representation. These contingencies create the need and opportunity for the integration of applied linguistic expertise within STEM education. In this chapter, a senior project officer from a major funding institution, a leading scientist, and a seasoned applied linguist discuss and exemplify the role and conditions in which applied linguistics can facilitate different aspects of STEM education. The Phage Hunting Integrating Research and Education (PHIRE) program is presented as an example of a collaboration that constructed shared, interdisciplinary education projects designed to enhance the program’s pedagogical mission.
References (11)
American Association of Medical Colleges – Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2009). Scientific foundations for future physicians. [URL]
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2010). Vision and change: A call to action. Washington, DC: Author. [URL]
Anderson, W.A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C.L., Elgin, S.C. R., et al.. (2011). Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science, 334, 152–153. 
Clark, I.E., Romero- Calderón, R., Olson, J.M., Jaworski, L., & Lopatto, D. (2009). “Deconstructing” scientific research: A practical and scalable pedagogical tool to provide evidence based science instruction. Public Library of Science: Biology, 7(12), e1000264. Doi:.
.Hanauer, D.I., & Bauerle, C. (2012). Facilitating innovation in science education through assessment reform. Liberal Education, 98(3). Retrieved from [URL]
Hanauer, D.I., Hatfull, G.F., & Jacobs-Sera, D. (2009). Active assessment: Assessing scientific inquiry. New York, NY: Springer.
Hanauer, D.I., Jacobs-Sera, D., Pedulla, M., Cresawn, S.G., Hendrix, R.W., & Hatfull, G.F. (2006). Teaching scientific inquiry. Science, 314(5807), 1880–1881.
Handelsman, J., Miller, S., & Pfund, C. (2007). Scientific teaching. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
National Research Council. (2003). BIO2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
. (2009). A new biology for the 21st century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) education for America’s future. Washington, DC: Author. [URL]
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Falout, Joseph, Glen Hill & Matthew Apple
2022. STEM English for Students: The Big Picture. In STEM English in Japan, ► pp. 347 ff. 
Chubko, Nadezhda, Julia E. Morris, David H. McKinnon, Eileen V. Slater & Geoffrey W. Lummis
2019. SOLO taxonomy as EFL students’ disciplinary literacy evaluation tool in technology-enhanced integrated astronomy course. Language Testing in Asia 9:1
Broggy, Joanne, John O’reilly & Sibel Erduran
2017. Interdisciplinarity and Science Education. In Science Education, ► pp. 81 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.