Article published in:
Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area
Vol. 41:2 (2018) ► pp. 175191


Bickel, Balthasar
2017Belhare. In Graham Thurgood & Randy LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Second edition, 696–721. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai & Sabine Stoll
2007Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83(1). 1–31. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1996The bipartite stem belt: disentangling areal and genetic correspondences. Berkeley Linguistic Society 22. 37–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denk, Lukas
2015Towards a typology of Multiple Agreement synchronic and diachronic case studies from eight languages. Universität Regensburg MA thesis.Google Scholar
Doornenbal, Marius
2009A Grammar of Bantawa: Grammar, paradigm tables, glossary and texts of a Rai language of Eastern Nepal. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
1987A Grammar of Limbu. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993A Grammar of Dumi. Berlin and New York: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine
2005The Himalayan Enclave Hypothesis & Bipartite Stems. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America, Annual Meeting, Oakland, CA, 6–9 January 2005.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2004Phonologie et morphologie du japhug (Rgyalrong): Université Paris VII – Denis Diderot dissertation.Google Scholar
2012aAgreement morphology: the case of Rgyalrongic and Kiranti. Language and Linguistics 13(1). 83–116.Google Scholar
2012bFrom denominal derivation to incorporation. Lingua 122(11). 1207–1231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aApplicative and tropative derivations in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 36(2). 1–13.Google Scholar
2013bHarmonization and disharmonization of affix ordering and basic word order. Linguistic Typology 17(2). 187–217. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014aClause linking in Japhug Rgyalrong. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 37(2). 263–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014bDenominal affixes as sources of antipassive markers in Japhug Rgyalrong. Lingua 138. 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016aComplementation in Japhug. Linguistics of the Tibeto Burman Area 39(2). 222–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bTonogenesis and tonal alternations in Khaling. In Enrique L. Palancar & Jean Léo Léonard (eds.), Tone and Inflection, 41–66. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017A reconstruction of Proto-Kiranti verb roots. Folia Linguistica Historica 38. 177–215.Google Scholar
to appear. Antipassive derivations in Sino-Tibetan/Trans-Himalayan and their sources. In Katarzyna Janic, Denis Creissels & Alena Witzlack-Makarevich eds. The multifaceted nature of Antipassive Amsterdam Benjamins
Jacques, Guillaume, Aimée Lahaussois, Boyd Michailovsky & Dhan Bahadur Rai
2012An overview of Khaling verbal morphology. Language and Linguistics 13(6). 1095–1170.Google Scholar
Lahaussois, Aimée
2003Thulung Rai. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 1. 1–25.Google Scholar
2009Koyi Rai: An initial grammatical sketch. Himalayan Linguistics Archive 4. 1–33.Google Scholar
Lai, Yunfan
2013La morphologie affixale du lavrung wobzi. Université Paris III MA thesis.Google Scholar
2017Grammaire du khroskyabs de Wobzi: Université Paris III dissertation.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy
2000Valency-changing derivations in Dulong/Rawang. In R. M. W. Dixon & A. Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Changing valency: Case studies in transitivity, 282–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011On transitivity in two Tibeto-Burman languages. Studies in Language 35(3). 637–650.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J. & David Sangdong
2015Rawang-English-Burmese dictionary. Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Lin, Youjing
2003Tense and aspect morphology in the Zhuokeji rGyalrong verb. Cahiers de linguistique – Asie orientale 32(2). 245–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd
1994Manner vs place of articulation in the Kiranti initial stops. In Hajime Kitamura, Tatsuo Nishida & Nagano Yasuhiko (eds.), Current Issues in Sino-Tibetan Linguistics, Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Michailovsky, Boyd, Martine Mazaudon, Alexis Michaud, Séverine Guillaume, Alexandre François & Evangelia Adamou
2014Documenting and researching endangered languages: the Pangloss Collection. Language Documentation and Conservation 8. 119–135.Google Scholar
Rutgers, Roland
1998Yamphu, Grammar, Texts and Lexicon. Leiden: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Schackow, Diana
2015A grammar of Yakkha Studies in Diversity Linguistics 7. Berlin: Language Science Press. http://​langsci​-press​.org​/catalog​/book​/66 Crossref
Straub, Nathan
2017Verb Compounds in Rawang. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T.-S.
2000Parallelisms in the Verb Morphology of Sidaba rGyalrong and Lavrung in rGyalrongic. Language and Linguistics 1(1). 161–190.Google Scholar
2004Verb-Stem Variations in Showu rGyalrong. In Ying-chin Lin, Fang-min Hsu Hsu, Chun-chih Lee, Jackson T.-S. Sun, Hsiu-fang Yang Yang & Dah-an Ho (eds.), Studies on Sino-Tibetan Languages: Papers in Honor of Professor Hwang-cherng Gong on His Seventieth Birthday, 269–296. Language and Linguistics Monograph Series W4.Google Scholar
2012Complementation in Caodeng rGyalrong. Language and Linguistics 13(3). 471–498.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shuya
2016La phonologie et la morphologie du dialecte de Bragdbar du rgyalrong situ. Université Paris III MA thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Brody, Parker L.
2019. Morphological exceptionality and pathways of change. Journal of Historical Linguistics 9:3  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Lahaussois, Aimée
2020. Predicate derivations in Thulung. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:1  pp. 57 ff. Crossref logo
Widmer, Manuel, Mathias Jenny, Wolfgang Behr & Balthasar Bickel
2021. Morphological structure can escape reduction effects from mass admixture of second language speakers. Studies in Language 45:4  pp. 707 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.