Article published in:
A micro-perspective on Verb Second in Romance and Germanic
Edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen
[Linguistic Variation 19:1] 2019
► pp. 141198
References

[ p. 172 ]References

Abels, Klaus
2003Successive cyclicity, anti-locality, and adposition stranding, Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
2012The italian left periphery: A view from locality, Linguistic Inquiry 43, no. 2, 229–254.Google Scholar
2017Beyond phrase-phrase interactions in the left periphery, Talk presented at the Workshop on Word Order in the Left Periphery. University of Oslo, October 17–18.
Abels, Klaus and Ad Neeleman
2012Linear asymmetries and the lca, Syntax 15, no. 1.Google Scholar
Aboh, Enoch O.
2004The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences: Clause structure and word order patterns in kwa, Oxford University Press, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Information structuring begins with the numeration, Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2, no. 1, 12–42.Google Scholar
Adams, James N.
1976The text and language of a vulgar latin chronicle (anonymus valesianus ii), Bulletin Supplement No. 36, Institute of Classical Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
1976A typological approach to latin word order, Indogermanische Forschungen, no. 81, 70–99, Reprinted.Google Scholar
1977The vulgar latin of the letters of Claudius terentianus, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
Adams, Marianne
1987From old french to the theory of pro-drop, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 1–32.Google Scholar
1987Old french, null subjects, and verb second phenomena, Ph.D. thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
1989Verb second effects in medieval french, Studies in Romance Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Seventeenth Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (Karl Kirschner and Janet Ann DeCesaris, eds.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, no. 60, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N.
1994Wackernagel’s law and the position of unstressed pronouns in classical latin, Transactions of the Philological Society 42, 103–178.Google Scholar
2007The regional diversification of latin, Cambridge University Press, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Late latin, A Companion to the Latin Language (James Clackson, ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 257–283.Google Scholar
2013Social variation and the latin language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, James N. and Nigel Vincent
(eds.) 2016Early and late latin: Continuity or change?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, With the assistance of Valerie Knight (ed.). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adger, David
2003Core syntax: a minimalist approach, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Adrian Battye, Ian Roberts
(ed.) 1995Clause structure and language change, OUP, New York; Oxford.Google Scholar
Aitchinson, Jean
2001Language change: progress or decay?, 3 ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2006Left-dislocation (including clld), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 668–699.Google Scholar
[ p. 173 ]
Alexiadou, Artemis and Elena Anagnostopoulou
1998Parametrizing agr: Word order, v-movement and epp checking, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16 (3), 491–539.Google Scholar
Ambar, Manuela
1992Para uma sintaxe da inverso sujeito-verbo em portugus, Colibri, Lisbon.Google Scholar
Anderson, James M. and Bernard Rochet
1979Historical romance morphology, Published for the University of Calgary by University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1993Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position, Language 69, 68–98.Google Scholar
2000Towards an optimal account of second position phenomena, Optimality Theory: phonology, syntax and acquisition (Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw, and Jeroen van de Weijer, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 302–333.Google Scholar
2004Subject clitics and verb-second in surmiran rumantsch, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 47, 1–22.Google Scholar
Andersson, Lars-Gunnar
1975Form and function of subordinate clauses, Ph.D. thesis, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Andrade, Aroldo de
2018Aboutness topics in old and middle french: A corpus-based study on the fate of v2, The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique 63, no. 2, 194–220.Google Scholar
Angantsson, ?sgrmur
2008Sentential negation and verb placement in embedded clauses in icelandic, Talk presented at the NORMS Workshop on Negation at the University of Oslo, March 11–12.
2011The syntax of embedded clauses in icelandic and related languages, Ph.D. thesis, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
Antomo, Mailin and Markus Steinbach
2010Desintegration und interpretation: Weil-v2-stze and Schnittstelle zwischen syntax, Semantik und pragmatik, Zeitschrift fr Sprachwissenschaft, no. 29, 1–37.Google Scholar
Antonelli, Andr
2015Roots of v-to-c movement in romance: Investigating late latin grammar, Presented at the conference ‘Traces of History’ at the University of Oslo, March 9–10 2015.
Arnbjrnsdttir, B., H. Thrinsson, and I. E. Nowenstein
to appear. V2 and v3 orders in north american icelandic, Journal of Language Contact.
Arteaga, Deborah L.
(ed.) 2013Research on old french: The state of the art, Springer, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Axel, Katrin
2007Studies on old high german syntax, Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 112, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ayres-Bennett, Wendy
1996A history of the french language through texts, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
1988Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
2001The natures of nonconfigurationality, The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (Mark Baltin and Chris Collins, eds.), Blackwell, Maiden, MA, pp. 407–438.Google Scholar
Baldi, Philip and Pierluigi Cuzzolin
(eds.) 2009New perspectives on historical latin syntax, vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Banniard, Michel
1992Viva voce: Communication crite et communication orale du ive au ixe sicle en occident latin, Institut des tudes augustiniennes, Paris.Google Scholar
[ p. 174 ]
Barbance-Guillot, Cline, Serge Heiden, and Alexei Lavrentiev
2017Base de franais mdival : une base de rfrence de sources mdivales ouverte et libre au service la communaut scientifique, Diachroniques 7, 168–184.Google Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar
1995Null subjects, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte
1995The emergence and development of svo patterning in latin and french: Diachronie and psycholinguistic perspectives, OUP, New York.Google Scholar
2009Word order, New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax. The Syntax of the Sentence. (Philip Baldi and Pierluigi Cuzzolin, eds.), Trends in Linguistics, vol. 1, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 241–316.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984Comp in bavarian syntax, Linguistic Inquiry, no. 3, 209–274.Google Scholar
2001Asymmetry in emphatic topicalisation, Audiatur vox sapientiae (Caroline Fry and Wolfgang Sternefeld, eds.), Studia grammatica (52), Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
2008 September. What is verb second?, Manuscript, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Bech, K. and C. M. Salvesen
2014Preverbal word order in old english and old french, Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the Germanic and Romance Languages (Kristin Bech and Kristine G. Eide, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 233–269.Google Scholar
Becker, Martin
2005Le corpus d’amsterdam face une vieille question: l’ancien franais est-il une langue v2?, Romanistische Korpuslinguistik II. Korpora und diachrone Sprachwissenschaft (Johannes Kabatek Claus D. Pusch and Wolfgang Raible, eds.), Gunter Narr Verlag, Tbingen, pp. 345–358.Google Scholar
2015Informationsstruktur und satzanordnung in der vulgata un den frhen volkssprachlichen bibelbersetzungen von lefvre und cassiodoro de reina, Historische Sprachwissenschaft als philologische Kulturwissenschaft (Elmar Eggert Michael Bernsen and Angela Schrott, eds.), Bonn University Press, pp. 601–629.Google Scholar
Behagel, Otto
1909Beziehungen zwischen umfang und reihenfolge von Satzgliedern, Indogermanische Forschungen 25, 110–142.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004Aspects of the low ip area, The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Luigi Rizzi, ed.), vol. 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp. 16–51.Google Scholar
2004Introduction, Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Adriana Belletti, ed.), vol. 3, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
2009Structures and strategies, Routledge, New York and Abingdon.Google Scholar
Beninc, Paola
1983Un’ ipotesi sulla sintassi dette lingue romanze antiche, Quadrini Patavini di Lingustica, no. 4, 3–19.Google Scholar
1995Complement clitics in medieval romance: The tobler-mussafia law, Clause Structure and Language Change (Ian Roberts and Adrian Battye, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 325–344.Google Scholar
2004The left periphery of medieval romance, Studi Linguistici e Filologici Online, no. 2, 243–297.Google Scholar
2006A detailed map of the left periphery of old romance, Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics (Raffaella Zanuttini, ed.), Georgetown University Press, Georgetown, pp. 53–86.Google Scholar
2013Caratteristiche del v2 romanzo, lingue romanze antiche, ladino dolomitico e portoghese, Introduzione alia linguistica del mocheno (Ermenegildo Bidese and Federica Cognola, eds.), Rosenberg & Sellier, Turin, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
[ p. 175 ]
Beninc, Paola and Cecilia Poletto
2004Topic, focus, and v2: Defining the cp sublayers, The Structure of CP and IP (Luigi Rizzi, ed.), Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, OUP, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine
2007Order and structure in embedded clauses in northern norwegian, Ph.D. thesis, University of Troms.Google Scholar
2009Embedded root phenomena, assertion, presupposition, and main point of utterance, Talk given at the Workshop on Root Phenomena, ZAS Berlin., September 2–4.
2014Verb placement in clauses with initial adverbial maybe, Nordic Atlas of Language Structures (NALS) 1, 225–239.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine, Piotr Garbacz, Caroline Heycock, and Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson
2009On variation in faroese verb placement, Troms Working Papers in Linguistics. Nordlyd 36, no. 2.Google Scholar
Bergh, Lars
1952Quelques rflexions sur l’inversion aprs la conjonction et en ancien et et moyen franais, Mlanges de philologie romane offerts M. Karl Michalsson par ses amis et ses lves, Bergendahl, Gteborg, pp. 43–55.Google Scholar
Berman, Judith
2003The clausal syntax of german, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules, On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania (Werner Abraham, ed.), Linguistik Aktuell, no. 3, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47–132.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den and Corretje Moed-van Walraven
1986The syntax of verbs in yiddish, Verb second phenomena in Germanic languages (Hubert Haider and Martin Prinzhorn, eds.), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 111–136.Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. M.
1999Verb movement and the syntax of kashmiri, Kluwer, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2002Verb second in afrikaans: is this a unitary phenomenon?, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 34, 19–69.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, and Ian Roberts
2014A syntactic universal and its consequences, Linguistic Inquiry 45, 169–225.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2014What principles and parameters got wrong, Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework (Carme Picallo, ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 155–179.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric and Kleanthes G. Grohmann
2005Left dislocation in germanic, Focus on Germanic Typology (Werner Abraham, ed.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 131–144.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute
2010The clause-initial position in 12 Swedish declaratives: word order variation and discourse pragmatics, The Nordic Languages and Second Language Acquisition Theory (Ute Bohnacker and Marit Westergaard, eds.), Special Issue of Nordic Journal of Linguistics 33 (2), pp. 105–143.Google Scholar
Bohnacker, Ute and Christina Rosn
2008The clause-initial position in 12 german declaratives: transfer of information structure, Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30, no. 4, 511–538.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D., Maria-Luisa Rivero, and Janig Stephens
1996Long head movement in breton, The Syntax of the Celtic Languages (Robert D. Borsley and Ian Roberts, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 53–74.Google Scholar
Bokovi, eljko
2018On movement out of moved elements, labels, and phases, Linguistic Inquiry 49, no. 2, 247–282.Google Scholar
[ p. 176 ]
Brandtner, Ellen
2004Head-movement in minimalism, and v2 as force-marking, The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 97–139.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Ash Asudeh, Ida Toivonen, and Stephen Wechsler
2015Lexical-functional syntax, second edition ed., Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burguy, Georges F.
1869Grammaire de la langue d’ol, ou grammaire des dialectes franais aux xiie et xiii sides, 2 ed., vol. 2, W. Weber, Berlin.Google Scholar
1869Grammaire de la langue d’ol, ou grammaire des dialectes franais aux xiie et xxiii sides, 2 ed., vol. 1, W. Weber, Berlin.Google Scholar
1870Grammaire de la langue d’ol, ou grammaire des dialectes franais aux xiie et xiii sides, 2 ed., vol. 3, W. Weber, Berlin.Google Scholar
Buridant, Claude
2000Grammaire nouvelle de l’anien franais, Sedes, Paris.Google Scholar
Burton, Philip
2011Christian latin, A Companion to the Latin Language (James Clackson, ed.), Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, pp. 485–501.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian syntax: A government-binding approach, Reidel, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bring, Daniel and Katharina Hartmann
2001The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in german, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, no. 2, 229–281.Google Scholar
Cabrillana, Concepcin
1999Type of text, pragmatic function, and constituent order: A comparative study of the Mulomedicina Chironis and the Peregrinatio Aetheriae, Latin vulgaire -latin tardif V. Actes du Ve colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Heidelberg 5–8 septembre 1997 (Hubert Petersmann and Rudolf Ketteman, eds.), Winter, Heidelberg.
Cardinaletti, Anna and Ian Roberts
2002Clause structure and x-second, Functional Structure in DP and IP (Guglielmo Cinque, ed.), The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 123–166.Google Scholar
Cat, Ccile De
2007French dislocation: Interpretation, syntax, acquisition, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cerquiglini, Bernard
1981La parole mdivale : discours, syntaxe, texte, Les Editions de minuit, Paris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
1981Lectures on government and binding, Studies in Generative Grammar, no. 9, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalization, Readings in English Transformational Grammar (Roderick A. Jacobs and Peter S. Rosenbaum, eds.), Ginn, Waltham, pp. 184–221.Google Scholar
1986Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
1995The minimalist program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries, Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (Roger Martin, Michaels David, and Juan Uriagereka, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 89–155.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase, Ken Hale: A life in language (Michael Kenstowicz, ed.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1–52.Google Scholar
2012Foreword, Phases : Developing the Framework (?ngel J. Gallego, ed.), Studies in Generative Grammar, no. 109, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin and Boston, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik
1977Filters and control, Linguistic Inquiry 8, no. 3, 425–504.Google Scholar
[ p. 177 ]
Cichosz, Anna
2017Inversion after clause-initial adverbs in old english: The special status of a, onne, nu, and swa, Journal of English Linguistics 45, no. 4, 308–337.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective, Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax, OUP, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo and Luigi Rizzi
2009The cartography of syntactic structures, The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis (Bernd Heine and Heiki Harrog, eds.), OUP, Oxford, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Clackson, James and Geoffrey Horrocks
2007The blackwell history of the latin language, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. and Susan E. Haviland
1977Comprehension and the given-new contract, Discourse production and comprehension (Roy O. Freedle, ed.), Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, New Jerset, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.
1975The logophoric pronoun in ewe: Its role in discourse, Journal of West African Languages, no. 2, 141–177.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica
2013Syntactic variation and verb second: A german dialect in northern italy, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Robert
1987Vulgar latin and the diversity of christian latin, Latin vulgaire – latin tardif (Jzsef Herman, ed.), Niemeyer, Tbingen, pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
Coultre, Jules Le
1875De l’ordre des mots dans chrestien de troyes, Ph.D. thesis, University of Leipizig.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2010Fronting as focalisation in Sicilian, Syntactic Variation. The Dialects of Italy (Roberta D’Alessandro, Adams Ledgeway, and Ian Roberts, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Csipak, Eva
2018Adverbial clauses and v3, Manuscript, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Ct, Marie-Hlne
1995Concurrence structurale, conditions d’apprhensibilit et changement syntaxique: la chute de la structure v2 en franais, Revue canadienne de linguistique, no. 40, 165–200.Google Scholar
Curtis, Rene L.
1963 (ed.), Le roman de tristan en prose, tome 1, Max Hueber Verlag, Mnchen.Google Scholar
1983 (ed.), Who wrote the prose tristan? a new look at an old problem, Neophilologus, no. 83, 35–41.Google Scholar
Cuzzolin, Pierluigi and Gerd Haverling
2009Syntax, sociolinguistics, and literary genres, New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 19–63.Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven
2011On the left periphery of latin embedded clauses, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University. Faculty of Arts and Philosophy.Google Scholar
2012Latin embedded clauses: The left periphery, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The decline of latin left-peripheral presentational foci: Causes and consequences, Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Informational-Structural Interactions (Theresa Biberauer and George Walkden, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 265–279.Google Scholar
2017The development of latin clause structure: A study of the extended verb phrase, Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Subject placement in the history of latin, Catalan Journal of Linguistics 16, 125–161.Google Scholar
Darmesteter, Arsne
1891 [1923], Course de grammaire historique de la langue franaise, 9 ed., Librairie Ch. Delagrave, Paris.Google Scholar
[ p. 178 ]
de Bakker, Cecile
1995Synchronie and diachronic variation in the french il-construction, Linguistics in the Netherlands (Marcel den Dikken and Kees Hengeveld, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
de Dardel, Robert
1983Declaratives romanes verbe initial, Vox Romanica 42, 1–37.Google Scholar
1989L’hypothse d’une base ovs en protoroman, Probus 1, 121–143.Google Scholar
1996la recherche du protoroman, Niemeyer, Tbingen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Une mise au point et une autocritique relatives au protoroman, Revue de linguistique romane 71, 329–358.Google Scholar
de Dardel, Robert and Rinze A. Haadsma
1976Le rejet du verbe dans les subordonnes romanes, Vox Romanica 35, 24–39.Google Scholar
de Haan, Germen and Fred Weerman
1986Finiteness and verb fronting in frisian, Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages (Hubert Haider and Martin Prinzhorn, eds.), Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 77–111.Google Scholar
de Kok, Ans
1985La place du pronom personal rgime conjoint en franais, Radopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
de Lage, G. Raynaud
1966 (ed.), Le roman de thbes, vol. tome I, Champion, Paris.Google Scholar
Demske, Urike
2012Clause linking and information packaging, Handout at the workshop ‘The Making of the Early Modern Period’, University of Agder in Kristiansand, June.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. and Laurence D. Stephens
2006Latin word order: Structured meaning and information, OUP, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, Tonya K.
2006The origins and development of germanic v2: Evidence from alliterative verse, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, Paul
1966/1944, Elementr dansk grammatik, Gyldendahl, Kbenhavn.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1990Verb movement and the subject position in yiddish, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, no. 1, 41–79.Google Scholar
Diez, Friedrich
1877Grammatik der romanischen sprachen, drei theile in einem bande, 4 ed., Weber, Bonn.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert
1994Ergativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, Bryan
2012Initial subordinate clauses in old french: Syntactic variation and the clausal left periphery, Lingua, no. 122, 1021–1046.Google Scholar
Dprez, Viviane
1988Stylistic inversion and verb movement, Proceedings of ESCOL 1988, pp. 71–82.Google Scholar
Drach, Eric
1963/1937, Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang
1969Eine textsyntaktische regel der idg. wortstellung: (zur anfangsstellung des prdikatverbums), Zeitschrift fr vergleichende Sprachforschung 83, no. 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
Dupuis, Fernande
1988Pro-drop dans les subordonnes an ancien franais, Revue Qubcoise de Linguistique Thorique et Applique, no. 7, 41–62.Google Scholar
1989L’expression du sujet dans les subordonnes en ancien franais, Ph.D. thesis, University of Montreal.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristine
2006Word order structures and unaccusative verbs in classical and modern Portuguese, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Eide, Kristine M.
2011Norwegian (non-v2) declaratives, resumptive elements, and the wackernagel position, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 34, no. 2, 179–213.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Elsabe C.
1974Old french: A concise handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
[ p. 179 ]
Ekerot, Lars-Johan
1988S-konstruktionen i svenskan, Lundastudier i nordisk sprkvetenskap, Lund University Press, Lund.Google Scholar
Elcock, William D.
1975The romance languages, Faber, London.Google Scholar
Elerick, Charles
1992Latin word order: Living on the edge, The Classical World, no. 86, 21–24.Google Scholar
1994How latin word order works, Papers on Grammar IV, Cooperativa Libraria Universitaria Editrice Bologna, Bologna, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
Elsig, Martin
2009Verb-second effects in old french and middle high german. considerations from the language border, Master’s thesis, Hamburg.Google Scholar
2012Subject-verb inversion in 13th century german and french, Multilingual individuals and multilingual societies (Kurt Braunmller and Christoph Gabriel, eds.), Hamburg studies on multilingualism 13, no. 13, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 223–239.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabeth and Enric Vallduv
1996Information packacing and grammar architecture: A constraint-based approach, Studies in HPSG. Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science (Claire Grover and Enric Vallduv, eds.), vol. 12, Centre for Cognitive Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Erdmann, Oskar
1886Grundzge der deutschen syntax nach ihrer geschichtlichen entwicklung. erste abteilung, Cotta, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold
1981Verb-second movement rules, Wiener Linguistische Gazette, no. 26, 15–34.Google Scholar
Eythrsson, Thrhallur
1995Verbal syntax in the early germanic languages, Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje, Svein Lie, and Kjell Ivar Vannebo
1997Norsk referansegrammatikk, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine and Kre Solfjeld
1994Deutsche und norwegische sachprosa im vergleich: Ein arbeitsbericht, Arbeitsberichte des Germanistischen Instituts der Universitt Oslo 6.Google Scholar
Falk, Yehuda N.
2001Lexical-function grammar: An introduction to parallel constraint-based syntax, CSLI, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2002Quirky ‘subjects’ and other specifiers, More than words: a Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich (Ingrid Kaufmann and Barbara Stiebeis, eds.), Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp. 227–250.Google Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella and Maria Goldbach
2002V2 syntax and topicalisation in old french, Linguistiche Berichte 189, 3–27.Google Scholar
2003Particles and sentence structure, a historical perspective, Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information (Uwe Junghanns and Luka Szucsich, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 101–127.Google Scholar
Fiis, Maria Alexandra
2003Ordern de palavras, transitividade e inacusatividade: Reflexio terica et anlise do portugus dos sculos xiii a xvi, Ph.D. thesis, Faculdade de Cincias Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Fodor, Janet Dean
1998Unambiguous triggers, Linguistic Inquiry, no. 29, 1–36.Google Scholar
Fontana, Josep M.
1993Phrase structure and the syntax of clitics in the history of Spanish, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1996Some problems in the analysis of non-finite verb fronting constructions, Language Change and Generative Grammar (Ellen Brandtner and Gisella Ferraresi, eds.), Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 191–229.Google Scholar
1997On the integration of second position phenomena, Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change (Ans van Kemenade and Nigel Vincent, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 207–249.Google Scholar
[ p. 180 ]
Foulet, Lucien
1923Petite syntaxe de l’ancien franais, 2 ed., Librairie Ancienne Honor Champion, Paris.Google Scholar
1930Petite syntaxe de l’ancien franais, 3 ed., Librairie Ancienne Honor Champion, Paris.Google Scholar
Franco, Irene
2017Stylistic fronting in old italian: a phase-based analysis, Language: Historical Syntax, no. 93, 114–151.Google Scholar
Franzen, Torsten
1939Etude sur la syntax des pronoms personnels sujets en ancien franais, Ph.D. thesis, University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara and Roland Hinterhlzl
2007Types of topics in german and italian, On information structure, meaning and form: generalizations across languages (Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 87–116.Google Scholar
Frede, Jensen
1986The syntax of medieval occitan, Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fr romanische Philologie 208, Niemeyer, Tbingen.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2004The grammar-pragmatics interface and the german prefield, Sprache und Pragmatik, no. 52, 1–39.Google Scholar
2004Notes on the syntax and the pragmatics of german left-dislocation, The syntax and semantics of the left periphery (Horst Lohnstein and Susanne Trissler, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 203–233.Google Scholar
2006Contrast and movement to the german prefield, The Architecture of Focus. Studies in Generative Grammar (Valria Molnr and Susanne Winkler, eds.), Studies in Generative Grammar, no. 82, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 235–264.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner and Federica Masiero
2018Desintegration versus parordination bei obwohl- und weil-konstruktionen, ZAS Papers in Linguistics 59, 57–82.Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike
2008Zur syntax und funktion von dass-stzen mit verbzweitstellung, Deutsche Sprache, no. 36.Google Scholar
2009Kontexte fr nicht-kanonische verbzweitstellung: V2 nach dass und verwandtes, Koordination und Subordination im Deutschen (Veronica Ehric, Christian Fortmann, Ingo Reich, and Marga Reis, eds.), Linguistiche Berichte. Sonderheft 16, Buske, Hamburg, pp. 113–134.Google Scholar
2010Obwohl vielleicht war es ganz anders, vorberlegungen zum alter der verbzweitstellung nach subordinierenden konjunktionen, Historische Textgrammatik und Historische Syntax des Deutschen (Arne Ziegler, ed.), De Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 55–84.Google Scholar
2016Vorfeldbeschrnkungen in adversativen whrend-gefgen, Talk given at the 2th International Workshop on Verb-Second Order at the University of Wuppertal, July 2016.
Fuss, Eric
2003On the historical core of v2 in germanic, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26, no. 2, 195–231.Google Scholar
2005The rise of agreement, a formal approach to the syntax and grammaticalization of verbal inflection, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, ?ngel J.
2010Phase theory, John Benjamins, Amsterdam; Philadelphia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Parameters, The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (Cedric Boeckx, ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 523–551.Google Scholar
2012 (ed.), Phases: Developing the framework, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin; Boston. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 181 ]
Geary, Patrick J.
1988Before france and germany: the creation and transformation of the merovingian world, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Genesee, Fred
1989Early bilingual development: one language or two?, Journal of Child Language 16, 161–179.Google Scholar
Genesee, Fred and Elena Nicoladis
2007Bilingual first language acquisition, Handbook of Language Development (E. Hoff and M. Shatz, eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 324–342.Google Scholar
Gildemeister, J.
1889 (ed.), Antonini placentini itinerarium, H. Reuthers Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin.Google Scholar
1889Antonini placentini itinerarium’, H. Reuthers Verlagsbuchhandlung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra and Fabio Pianesi
1996Tense and aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax, OUP, New York.Google Scholar
Givn, Talmy
1971Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: an archeologist’s field trip, Chicago Linguistic Society 7, 394–415.Google Scholar
Glzow, Lisa and Natalia Gagarina
2007 (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: Defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept, Studies on Language Acquisition, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gnther, Susanne
2000“wobei (.) es hat alles immer zwei Seiten.” zur Verwendung von wobei im gesprochenen deutsch, Manuscript, University of Konstanz. InLiSt 18, June 2000.Google Scholar
Gonzlez, Sergio A.
2009Anlisis del itinerarium egeriae i–ii, Byzantion Nea Hells 28, 105–125.Google Scholar
Green, John N.
2000Spanish, The Romance Languages (Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, eds.), Routledge, London and New York, 3 ed., pp. 79–130.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Gnther
1993Aspekte der deutschen syntax: eine rektions-bindungs-analyse, Gnter Narr, Tbingen.Google Scholar
2008The clausal left periphery: Clitic left-dislocation in italian and left-dislocation in german, Dislocated elements in discourse (Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, eds.), Routledge, London, pp. 49–94.Google Scholar
2009The left clausal periphery, Dislocated elements in discourse (Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, eds.), Routledge, London, pp. 49–94.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Gnther and Cecilia Poletto
2011Hidden verb second, the case of cimbrian, Studies on German Language Islands (Michael T. Putnam, ed.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 301–346.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. G.
2003Prolific domains, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grtner, Hans-Martin
2001Are there v2 relative clauses in german?, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3, no. 2, 97–141.Google Scholar
2016A note on the rich agreement hypothesis and varieties of embedded v2, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 96, 1–13.Google Scholar
Guizot, M.
1858Essais sur l’histoire de france, 9 ed., Didier et Ce, Libraures-diteurs, Paris.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1992Theory and description in generative syntax a case study in west flemish, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
1995The syntax of negation, Oxford University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Verb second, the split cp and null subjects in early dutch dialects, Gen-GenP 4, no. 2, 133–175.Google Scholar
[ p. 182 ]
2006Argument fronting in english, romance clld and the left periphery, Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture (Raffaella Zanuttini, Hctor Campos, Elena Herburger, and Paul Portner, eds.), Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, pp. 27–52.Google Scholar
2007Operator movement and topicalisation in adverbial clauses, Folia Linguistica 41, no. 3–4, 279–325.Google Scholar
2010The internal syntax of adverbial clauses, Lingua 120, 628–648.Google Scholar
2012Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena and the composition of the left periphery, Oxford University Press, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Main clause phenomena: new horizons, The syntax of MCP: deriving the truncation account (Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 113–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Ciro Greco
2016V>2, Paper presented at Rethinking Verb-Second, Cambridge, 22th-24th March 2016.
Haider, Hubert
1986Verb second phenomena in germanic languages, ch. V-Second in German, pp. 49–75, Foris Publications, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Deutsche syntax generativ. Vorstudien zur theorie einer projektiven grammatik, Gnter Narr, Tbingen.Google Scholar
2010The syntax of german, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Ken
1983Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, no. 1, 5–47.Google Scholar
1989On nonconfigurational structures, Configurationality: The Typology of Asymmetries (Marcz Laslo and Pieter Muysken, eds.), Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 293–300.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. and Lyle Campbell
1995Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective, Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Martin
1977A typological approach to word order change in french, Romance Syntax: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives (Martin Harris, ed.), Salford University, Salford, pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
1978The evolution of french syntax: A comparative approach, Longman, London.Google Scholar
1984On the causes of word order change, Lingua 63, 175–204.Google Scholar
1984On the strengths and weaknesses of a typological approach to historical syntax, Historical Syntax (Jacek Fisiak, ed.), Mouton, Berlin, pp. 183–198.Google Scholar
2000French, The Romance Languages (Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, eds.), Routledge, London and New York, pp. 209–245.Google Scholar
2000The romance languages, The Romance Languages (Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, eds.), Routledge, London and New York, 3 ed., pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag T. T.
2017Backward control in ancient greek and latin participial conjuncts, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35, 99–159, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag T. T. and Marius L. Jhndal
2008Creating a parallel treebank of the old indo-european bible translations, Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage Data (Caroline Sporleder and Kiril Ribarov, eds.). pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
[ p. 183 ]
Head, Brian F. and Larissa Semnova-Head
2013Vestgios da presena sueva no noroeste da pennsula ibrica: na etnologia, na arqueologia e na lngua, Revista Diacrtica 27 (2), 257–277.Google Scholar
Heraeus, Wilhelm
1908 (ed.), Siviae vel potius aetheriae peregrinatio, Carl Winter, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Herman, J.
1963Sur la prhistoire du systme roman des adverbes de temps, Beitrge zur Romanischen Philologie 2, no. 1, 150–165.Google Scholar
Herman, Jzsef
1990Recherches sur l’ordre des mots dans les plus anciens textes franais en prose, Du latin aux langues romanes, tudes de linguistique historique runies par Sandor Kiss avec une prface de Jacques Monfrin, Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 234–288.Google Scholar
2000Vulgar latin, The Pensylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Herzenberg, Marie Johanne Bordai
2015Third person reference in late latin, demonstratives, definite articles, and personal pronouns in the itinerarium egeriae, Mouton de Gruyter, Tbingen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2006Embedded root phenomena, The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 174–209.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Antonella Sorace, and Zakaris Svabo Hansen
2010V-to-i and v2 in subordinate clauses: an investigation of faroese in relation to icelandic and danish, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13, no. 1, 61–97.Google Scholar
Hinojo, Gregorio
1986El orden de palabras en la peregrinatio aetheriae, Studia Zamorensia 7, 81–87.Google Scholar
Hinterhlzl, Roland and Svetlana Petrova
2010From v1 to v2 in west germanic, Lingua, no. 120, 315–328.Google Scholar
Hirschbhler, Paul
1990La lgitimation de la construction v1 sujet nul en subordonne en prose et en vers en anien francais, Rvue Qubecoise de Linguistique 19, no. 1, 33–55.Google Scholar
Hirschbhler, Paul and Marie-Odile Junker
1988Remarques sur les sujets nuls en subordonnes en ancien et en moyen franais, Rvue Qubecoise de Linguistique Thorique et Applique 7, no. 3, 63–84.Google Scholar
Hänsch, Alexandra Y.
2014Germanic properties in the left periphery of old french: V-to-c-movement, xp-fronting, stylistic fronting and verb-initial clauses, Ph.D. thesis, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich
1993The split cp hypothesis and the frisian complementiser system, Ms., Frisian Academy.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johannes B.
1951Lateinische Umgangssprache, 3 ed., Winter, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johannes B. and Anton Szantyr
1965Lateinische syntax und Stilistik, Beck, Mnchen.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
1986Word order and syntactic features in the Scandinavian languages and english, Ph.D. thesis, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
2000Scandinavian stylistic fronting: how any category can become an expletive, Linguistic Inquiry, no. 31, 445–483.Google Scholar
2006Stylistic fronting, The Blackwell Companion to Syntax (Martin Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 532–565.Google Scholar
2015Verb second, Syntax – an International Handbook on Contemporary Syntactic Research (Tibor Kiss and Artemis Alexiadou, eds.), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 342–382.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders and Christer Platzack
1995Role of inflection in Scandinavian syntax, OUP, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan and Sandra Thompson
1973On the applicability of root transformations, Linguistic Inquiry, no. 4, 465–497.Google Scholar
[ p. 184 ]
Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra Thompson
1984The discourse basis for lexical categories in universal grammar, Language 60, 703–752.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert, Jairo Nunes, and Kleanthes G. Grohmann
2010Understanding minimalism, CUP, New York.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar H. and Anna-Lena Wiklund
2009Embedded v2: Icelandic a, b, c, etc, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84, 21–51.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn and Anna-Lena Wiklund
2009General embedded v2: Icelandic a, b, c, etc., Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84, 21–51.Google Scholar
Hsu, Brian
2017Verb second and its deviations: An argument for feature scattering in the left periphery, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 2 (1), no. 35, 1–33.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke and Ans van Kemenade
1995Verb second, prop-drop, functional projections and language change, Clause Structure and Language Change (Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds.), Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp. 227–257.Google Scholar
Hulk, Aafke and Natasha Mller
2000Bilingual first language acquisition at the interphase between syntax and pragmatics, Bilingualism: Langage and Cognition 3, 227–244.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine and Anthony Kroch
1992The licensing of cp-recursion and its relevance to the germanic verb-second phenomenon, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 50, 1–25.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2005Adverbs and the syntax of subjects in old french, Romania, no. 123, 99–122.Google Scholar
2007la recherche des origines de la syntaxe de ‘ja’ et de ‘onques’ antposs en ancien franais, Zeitschrift fr romanische Philologie 1, no. 122, 57–78.Google Scholar
2013A derivational approach to negative polarity item licensing in old french, Research on Old French: The State of the Art (Deborah L. Arteaga, ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 261–281.Google Scholar
2014Old french negation, the tobler/mussafia law, and v2, Lingua, no. 147, 25–39.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1977X-bar-syntax: A study of phrase structure, Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, no. 2, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
2002Foundations of language, brain, meaning, grammar, evolution, Oxford University Press, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, Edward
1982The origins of france, 500–1000, MacMillan, London.Google Scholar
1988The franks, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1974The syntax of the old french subjunctive, De Gruyter Mouton, The Hague. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984The syntax of medieval occitan, Beihefte zur Zeitschrift fr romanische Philologie 208, Niemeyer, Tbingen.Google Scholar
Jnsson, Jhannes Gsli
1996Clausal architecture and case in icelandic, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amhurst.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne Elisabeth
1996Clause structure and verb syntax in Scandinavian and english, Ph.D. thesis, University of Harvard.Google Scholar
Josefsson, Gunlg
2003Non-target structures and non-target uses in child and adult Swedish, The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar (Gunlg Josefsson, Christer Platzack, and Gisela Hkansson, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 155–195.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2007Embedded v2 in norwegian and Swedish, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80, 103–161.Google Scholar
2009Embedded clauses with main clause word order in mainland Scandinavian.Google Scholar
[ p. 185 ]
2015The force of v2 revisited, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18, 139–181.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A.
2002Verbstellung und verbstellungswandel in den romanischen sprachen, Linguistische Arbeiten, no. 465, Max Niemeyer, Tbingen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Losing the null subject a constrastive study of (brazilian) portuguese and (medieval) french, Proceedings of the Workshop “Null Subjects, Expletives and Locatives in Romance” (University of Konstanz) (Georg A. Kaiser and Eva-Marie Remberger, eds.), Arbeitspapier 123, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, pp. 131–156.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. and Franziska Maria Hack
2013Language change in comparison: The (special) case of raeto-romance, Sprachwandervergleich – Comparing Diachronies, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 73–98.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. and Michael Zimmermann
2011On the decrease in subject-verb inversion in french declaratives, The Development of Grammar. Language acquisition and diachronic change. In honour of Jrgen M. Meisel (Esther Rinke and Tanja Kupisch, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam and Philadelphia, pp. 355–381.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary Aizawa
1999Strong pronouns and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter, Probus 11, 1–37.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The antisymmetry of syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Khner, Raphael and Carl Stegmann
1955Ausfhrliche grammatik der lateinischen sprache, 3 ed., vol. 2, Gottschalksche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Leverkusen.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1995Indo-european origins of germanic syntax, Clause structure and language change (Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 140–169.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky
1970Fact, Progress in Linguistics (Manfried Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph, eds.), Mouton, The Hague, pp. 143–173.Google Scholar
Klævik-Pettersen, Espen
2018Replication data for: “inversion, v-to-c, and verb second: an investigation into the syntax and word order of old french and late latin.Google Scholar
2019Inversion, v-to-c, and verb second: an investigation into the syntax and word order of old french and late latin, Ph.D. thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf
2000The flexible nature of verb movement, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda
1984The syntax of verbs: From verb movement rules in the kru languages to universal grammar, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan
1975Dutch as an sov-language, Lingustic Analysis, no. 1, 111–136.Google Scholar
2008A reappraisal of classical v2 and scrambling in dutch, Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 46, 27–54.Google Scholar
Koster, Jan and Jan Wouter Zwart
2000Transitive expletive constructions and the object shift parameter, Linguistics in the Netherlands 17, no. 1, 159–170.Google Scholar
Kotcheva, Christin Schtzle Miriam Butt Kristina, Tina Bgel and Nicole Deh
2014A diachronic perspective on v1 in icelandic, Preproceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2014, Tbingen, Germany, February 2014, pp. 187–191.
Krifka, Manfred
2014Embedding illocutionary acts, Recursion: complexity in cognition (Thomas Roeper and Margaret Speas, eds.), Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 59–87.Google Scholar
2017October. Biscuit conditionals as anticipatory speech acts, Presentation at the workshop ‘Buiscuit Conditionals’, University of Hamburg, October 20–21.
[ p. 186 ]
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of child language, Language Variation and Change, no. 1, 199–244.Google Scholar
1994Morphosyntactic variation, Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (Kathryn Beals, ed.), Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 180–201.Google Scholar
2005Modeling language change and language acquisition, Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania. Available from http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/kroch​/papers​/lsa​-forum​.pdf. Accessed May 2018.
Labelle, Marie
2007Clausal architecture in early old french, Lingua 117, no. 1, 289–316.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie and Paul Hirschbhler
2005Changes in clausal organization and the position of clitics in old french, Grammaticalization and Parametric Change (Monserrat Batllori, MariaLlusa Hernanz, Carme Picallo, and Francesc Roca, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 60–71.Google Scholar
2014Y avait-il antposition stylistique en ancien franais?, Congrs Mondial de Linguistique Franaise (Crossref), no. 8, SHS Web of Conferences, pp. 277–296.Google Scholar
2018Topic and focus in old french v1 and v2 structures, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 63, no. 2, 264–287.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2007Transmission and diffusion, Language 83, no. 2, 344–387.Google Scholar
Langus, Alan and Marina Nespor
2015On the nature of word order regularities, Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax (Marc van Oostendorp and Henk van Riemsdijk, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 141–166.Google Scholar
Larsson, Ida and Janne B. Johannessen
2015Incomplete acquisition and verb placement in heritage Scandinavian, Moribund Germanic Heritage Languages in North America: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Findings (R. S. Page and M. T. Putnam, eds.), Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, pp. 153–189.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1997Historical linguistics and language change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2005Moving through the left periphery: the dual complementiser system in the dialects of southern italy, Transactions of the Philological Society 103, no. 3, 339–396.Google Scholar
2008Satisfying v2 in early romance: Merge vs. move, Journal of Linguistics 44, no. 2, 437–470.Google Scholar
2009Grammatica diachronica del napoletano, Niemeyer, Tbingen. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012From latin to romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change, Oxford Studies In Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, OUP, Oxford and New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Late latin verb second: The sentential word order of the itinerarium egeriae, Catalan Journal of Linguistics, no. 16, 163–216.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1972Converging theories in linguistics, Language 48, 266–275.Google Scholar
Lemieux, Monique and Fernande Dupuis
1995Clause structure and language change, The Locus of Verb Movement in Non-Asymmetric Verb-Second Languages: The Case of Middle French (Ian Roberts and Adrian Batty, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 80–110.Google Scholar
Lerch, Eugen
1934Historische franzsische syntax, O.R. Reisland, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lfstedt, Einar
1936 [1911], Philologischer kommentar zur peregrinatio aetheriae: Untersuchungen zur geschickte der lateinischen sprache, Almqvist & Wikseil, Uppsala.Google Scholar
[ p. 187 ]
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of diachronic syntax, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
1989The child’s trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, no. 12, 321–375.Google Scholar
1991How to set parameters: Arguments from language change, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
1999The development of language: Acquisition, change, and evolution, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David and Jon Havenhill
2018 (eds.), Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Linde, Paul
1923Stellung des verbs in der lateinischen prosa, Glotta 12, 153–178.Google Scholar
Lippert, Jrg
1974Beitrge zur technik und syntax althochdeutscher bersetzungen unter besonderer bercksichtigung der isidorgruppe un des althochdeutschen tatian, Fink, Munich.Google Scholar
Lodge, R. Anthony
2001French: from dialect to standard, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2012The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems, Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English (Anneli Meurman-Solin, Mara Jos Lpez-Couso, and Bettelou Los, eds.), OUP, Oxford and New York, pp. 21–46.Google Scholar
Loseth, Eilert
1891/1970, Le roman en prose de tristan, le roman de palamede, et la compilation de rusticien de pise analyse critique d’aprs les manuscrits de paris, Burt Franklin, New York.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher
2015Contact-induced language change, The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics (Claire Bowern and Bethwyn Evans, eds.), Routle, London and New York, pp. 519–536.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
1990Inversion in embedded clauses in modern icelandic, Modern Icelandic Syntax (Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 71–91.Google Scholar
Maraval, Pierre
1982 (ed.), grie: Journal de voyage (itinraire), Sources Chrtiennes, Les editions du cerf, Paris.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1985Dire le vrai: L’adverbe “si” en franais mdivale. essai de linguistique historique, Publications Romanes et Franaises 168, Droz, Geneva.Google Scholar
1995L’volution du franais: Ordres des mots, dmonstratifs, accent tonique, Armand Colin.Google Scholar
1998Dislocations en ancien franais: thmatisation ou rhmatisation?, Cahiers de praxmatique 30, 162–178.Google Scholar
1999Le franais en diachronie: douze sicles d’volution, Ophrys, Paris and Gap.Google Scholar
Marouzeau, Jules
1922L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine, vol. 1: Les groupes nominaux, Champion, Paris.Google Scholar
Martins, Ana Mara
2000Polarity items in romance: Underspecification and lexical change, Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms (Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas, and Anthony Warner, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 191–219.Google Scholar
Maras, Julin
1990Understanding spain. translated by frances m. lpez-morillas, University of Michigan Press and University of Puerto Rico Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Friedrich
1909Die beziehungen des altlateins zum sptlatein, Neue Jahrbcher fr das klassische Altertum, Geschichte und deutsche Literatur 23, 434–448.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric
2006Quirky subjects in old french, Studia Linguistica 60, no. 3, 282–312.Google Scholar
2006Stylistic fronting in old french, Probus 18, 219–266.Google Scholar
[ p. 188 ]
2009On the germanic properties of old french, Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory (Paolo Crisma and Giuseppe Longobardi, eds.), OUP, Oxford, pp. 344–357.Google Scholar
2013The left periphery in old french, Research on Old French: The State of the Art (Deborah L. Arteaga, ed.), Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 327–350.Google Scholar
Mathisen, Ralph Whitney
1993Roman aristocrats in barbarian gaul strategies for survival in an age of transition, University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John H.
2008Inflectional morphology and universal grammar: post hoc versus propter hoc, Variation, Selection, Development. Probing the Evolutionary Model of Language Change (Regine Eckardt, Gerhard Jger, and Tonjes Veenstra, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 337–374.Google Scholar
Meillet, Anthoine
1931Sur une priode de bilinguisme en france, Comptes rendus des sances de l’Acadmie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 75 anne 75, no. 1, 29–38.Google Scholar
Meyer-Hermann, Reinhard
1988se debe la postposicin del sujeto en espaol a una influencia rabe?, Revista de filologa espaola, no. 68, 67–96.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lbke, Wilhelm
1899Grammatik der romansichen sprachen dritter band: Syntax, Reisland, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line
2010On what comes first in a verb-second language, Unpublished manuscript, University of Berkeley.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Gary
1975Indo-european: Vso, sov, svo, or all three?, Lingua 37, 31–52.Google Scholar
Mller, Gereon
2004Verb-second as vp-first, Journal of Comparative Linguistics 3, no. 7, 179–234.Google Scholar
Mller, Stefan
2018German clause structure: An analysis with special consideration of so-called multiple frontings, Language Science Press, Berlin, With contributions by Felix Bildhauer and Philippa Cook.Google Scholar
Mnard, Philippe
1987 (ed.), Le roman de tristan en prose tome 1, Librairie Droz, Genve.Google Scholar
Mohr, Sabine
2009V2 as a single-edge phenomenon, Selected papers from the 2006 Cyprys syntaxfest (Kleanthes K. Grohmann and Phoevos Panagiotis, eds.), Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, pp. 141–158.Google Scholar
Mohrmann, Christine
1958–1977tudes sur le latin des chrtiens (4 vols.), Storia y Letteratura, Roma.Google Scholar
Murray, Jessie
1929 (ed.), La vie de saint eustace, Librairie Ancienne Honor Champion, Paris, Publi en ligne par 1ENS de Lyon dans la Base de franais mdival, http://​catalog​.bfm​-corpus​.org​/SEustPr1 dernire rvision le 23-3-2016.
Mussafia, Alfredo
1898Enclisi o proclisi del pronome personale atono qual oggetto, Romania 27, no. 105, 145–146.Google Scholar
Mutz, Katrin
2009ber das franzsische und seine wechselwirkungen mit dem deutschen, Unsere sprachlichen Nachbarn in Europa. Die Kontaktbeziehungen zwischen Deutsch und seinen Grenznachbarn (Christel Stolz, ed.), Universittsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, Bochum, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, B., V. Di Tomaso, and C. M. Verspoor
1996Unaccusative or unergative? verbs of manner of motion, Quaderni del Laboratorio di Llinguistica 10, ¡p¿n/a¡/p¿.Google Scholar
Neeleman, Ad and Hans Koot
2008Dutch scrambling and the nature of discourse templates, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 11, no. 2, 137–189.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Friedrich J.
2005Possible and probable languages a generative perspective on linguistic typology, Oxford University Press, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 189 ]
Nilsen, ystein
2003Eliminating positions: Syntax and semantics of sentential modification, Ph.D. thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Nissen, Harald
1943L’ordre des mots dans la chronique de jean d’outremeuse, Ph.D. thesis, University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
nnerfors, Olaf
1997Verb-erst-deklarativstze grammatik und pragmatik, Lunder Germanische Forschungen 60, Almqvist & Wikseil International, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Nordstrm, Jackie
2010The Swedish s-construction, a new point of departure, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 85, 37–63.Google Scholar
Oniga, Renato
2014Latin: A linguistic introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Edited and translated by Norma Schifano.Google Scholar
Oniga, Renato and Carlo Cecchetto
2014Constituency as a language universal: the case of latin, Lingue Antiche e Moderne 3, 5–35.Google Scholar
Ostafin, David
1986Studies in latin word order: A transformational approach, Ph.D. thesis, University of Connecticut: Unpublished. Non vidi.Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis
2014An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation, Linguistic Inquiry 45, no. 2, 269–303.Google Scholar
2018Stylistic fronting as remnant topicalisation, Studia Linguistica 72, no. 1, 1–38.Google Scholar
Palmer, Leonard R.
1954/2001, The latin language, Bristol Classical Press, London.Google Scholar
Panhuis, Dirk
1982The communicative perspective in the sentence: A study of latin word order, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1984Is latin a sov language?, Indogermanische Forschungen, no. 89, 140–159.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2007The fine structure of the left periphery: Comps and subjects: Evidence from romance, Lingua 117, no. 6, 1057–1079.Google Scholar
Parkinson, Stephen
2000Portuguese, The Romance Languages (Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, eds.), Routledge, London and New York, 3 ed., pp. 131–169.Google Scholar
Pasch, Renate
1997Weil mit hauptsatz – kuckucksei im denn-nest, Deutsche Sprache 25, 252–271.Google Scholar
Pauly, Dennis
2013Grenzflle der subordination: Merkmale, empirie und theorie unabhngiger nebenstze, Ph.D. thesis, University of Potsdam, Berlin.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph
2002A history of the Spanish language, 2 ed., CUP, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pensalfini, Rob
2004Towards a typology of configurationality, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22, no. 2, 359–408.Google Scholar
Petri, Franz
1937Germanische volkserbe in wallonien und nordfrankreich. die frnkische landnahme in frankreich und den niederlnden und die bildung der westlichen Sprachgrenze, Rhrscheid, Bonn, 2 volumes.Google Scholar
1973Siedlung, sprache und bevlkerungsstruktur, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1991Evidence for svo in latin?, Latin and the Romance Languages in the Early Middle Ages (Roger Wright, ed.), Routledge, London, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
Pinto, Carlos Felipe de C.
2011Ordem de palavras, movimento do verbo e efeito v2 na histria do espanhol, Ph.D. thesis, Unicamp.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1991Phrase structures in competition: variation and change in old english clause structure, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1995Variation and change in old english clause structure, Language Variation and Change 7, 229–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1985Narrative inversion in old icelandic, ?slenskt ml 7, 127–144.Google Scholar
[ p. 190 ]
1986Comp, infl, and germanic word order, Topics in Scandinavian Syntax (Lars Hellan and Kristi Koch, eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 365–391.Google Scholar
1995The loss of verb second in english and french, Clause Structure and Language Change (Ian Roberts and Adrian Battye, eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 200–226.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2000The higher functional field: Evidence from northern italian dialects, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
2002The left-periphery of v2-rhaetoromance dialects: a new view on v2 and v3, Syntactic Microvariation (Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips, and Susanne van der Kleij, eds.), Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
2005’si’ and ‘e’ as cp expletives in old italian, Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation (Monserrat Batllori, Maria-Llusa Hernanz, Carme Picallo, and Francesc Roca, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 206–235.Google Scholar
2006Parallel phases: a study on the high and low left periphery of old italian, Phases of Interpretation (Maria Frascarelli, ed.), Studies in Generative Grammar, no. 91, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 261–294.Google Scholar
2014Word order in old italian, Oxford University Press, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb-movement, ug and the structure of ip, Linguistic Inquiry, no. 20, 365–425.Google Scholar
Posner, Rebecca
1996The romance languages, CUP, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Price, Granville
1966Contribution l’tude de la syntaxe des pronoms personnel sujet en ancien franais, Romania, no. 87, 476–504.Google Scholar
1971The french language: Present and past, Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
1973Sur le pronom personnel sujet postpos en ancien franais, Revue Romaine 8, 226–236.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981Toward a taxonomy of given-new information, Radical pragmatics (Peter Cole, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–255.Google Scholar
Prvost, Sophie
2001La postposition du sujet en franais aux xve et xvie sicles, CNRS Editions, Paris.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst
1958The tongues of italy: Prehistory and history, Greenwood, New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radwan, Sonja
2011L’ordre des mots en ancien franais la syntaxe et la structure informationelle de la zone prverbale, Master’s thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Ramat, Anna Giacalone and Caterina Mauri
2011The grammaticalization of coordinating inter-clausal connectives, The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics, Philosophica 27, 53–93.Google Scholar
Reinholtz, Charlotte
1989V-2 in mainland Scandinavian: Finite verb movement to agr, WPSS 44, 101–117.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1974Syntaktische hauptsatz-privilegien und das problem der deutschen Wortstellung, Zeitschrift fr Germanische Linguistik 2, no. 3, 299–327.Google Scholar
2006Is german v-to-c movement really semantically motivated? some empirical problems, Theoretical Linguistics 32, no. 3, 369–380.Google Scholar
2013“weil-v2”-stze und (k)ein ende? anmerkungen zur analyse von antomo und steinbach (2010), Zeitschrift fr Sprachwissenschaft 32, no. 2, 221–262.Google Scholar
[ p. 191 ]
Reis, Marga and Angelika Wllstein
2010Zur grammatik (vor allem) konditionaler vl-gefge im deutschen, Zeitschrift fr Sprachwissenschaft 29, 111–179.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie and Heiner Drenhaus
2011Working-memory effects of information-structure in german left dislocation (gld), Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing 17, University of Paris Descartes, September 1–3.
Rgnvaldsson, Eirikur and Hskuldur Thrinsson
1990On icelandic word order once more, Modern Icelandic Syntax (Joan Maling and Annie Zaenen, eds.), Syntax and Semantics, no. 24, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Ilza
1995Evidence for a verb-second phase in old Portuguese, Clause Structure and Language Change (Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds.), OUP, Oxford, pp. 110–139.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van
1997Left dislocation, Materials on left-dislocation (Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk, and Frans Zwarts, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Riemsdijk, Henk van and Edwin Williams
1986Introduction to the theory of grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther
2003On the licensing of null subjects in old french, Syntactic Structures and Morphological Information (Uwe Junghanns and Luka Szucsich, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 217–247.Google Scholar
2009Verb placement in old Portuguese, Focus and Background in Romance Languages (Andreas Dufter and Daniel Jacobs, eds.), Studies in Language Companion Series, no. 112, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 309–332.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther and Jrgen M. Meisel
2009Subject inversion in old french: Syntax and information structure, Proceedings of the Workshop “Null subjects, Expletives, and Locatives in Romance” (Constance) (Georg A. Kaiser and Eva-Marie Remberger, eds.), Arbeitspapier 123, Universitt Koblenz, pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
Rinke, Esther and Martin Elsig
2010Quantitative evidence and diachronic syntax, Lingua 120, no. 11, 2557–2568.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982Isses in italian syntax, Foris, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery, Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax (Liliane Haegeman, ed.), Kluwer International Handbooks of Linguistics, no. 1, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 281–337.Google Scholar
2001Locality and left periphery, Ms; University of Siena.Google Scholar
2004On the cartography of syntactic structures, The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (Luigi Rizzi, ed.), vol. 2, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
2007On some properties of criterial freezing, CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition 1, 145–158.Google Scholar
2013Notes on cartography and further explanation, International Journal of Latin and Romance Linguistics 25, no. 1, 197–226.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993Verbs and diachronic syntax: A comparative history of english and french, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, no. 28, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
2004The c-system in brythonic Celtic languages, v2, and the epp, The Structure of CP and IP (Luigi Rizzi, ed.), OUP, Oxford, pp. 297–328.Google Scholar
2007Diachronic syntax, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
2011Head movement and the minimalist program, The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism (Cedric Boeckx, ed.), OUP, Oxford, pp. 195–219.Google Scholar
[ p. 192 ]
2012Phases, head movement and second-position effects, Phases: Developing the Framework (?ngel J. Gallego, ed.), De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin; Boston, pp. 385–440.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian and Anders Holmberg
2010Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory, Parametric Variation. Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory (Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts, and Michelle Sheehan, eds.), CUP, Cambridge, pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967Contraints on variables in syntax, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
1973The penthouse principle and the order of constituents, You Take the High Node and I’ll Take the Low Node (Clauda Corum, Cedrik Smith-Stark, and Weiser Ann, eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 397–422.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain
2004Les clitiques pronominaux et la priphrie gauche en ancien franais, Bulletin de la Socit de linguistique de Paris 99, no. 1, 181–237.Google Scholar
Rowlett, Paul
2007The syntax of french, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg
2011Stylistic fronting and remnant movement in old french, Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2009: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009. (Janine Berns, Haike Jakobs, and Tobias Scheer, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 323–342.Google Scholar
2013Topics and the left periphery: A comparison of old french and modern germanic, In Search of Universal Grammar: From Old Norse to Zoque (Terje Lohndal, ed.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 131–172.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg and Kristin Bech
2014Postverbal subjects in old english and old french, Corpus-based Studies in Contrastive Linguistics (Signe Oksefjeld Ebeling, Atle Grnn, Kjetil R. Hauge, and Diana Santos, eds.), Oslo Studies in Language 6 (1), pp. 201–228.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine Meklenborg and George Walkden
2017Diagnosing embedded v2 in old english and old french, Micro-change and macro-change in diachronic syntax (Eric Mathieu and Robert Truswell, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 168–181. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
1997From latin weak pronouns to romance clitics, Estudos Lingstucos e Literrios 19 (Ros Virginia Mattos e Silva, ed.), Universidade Federal de Bahia, Salvador, pp. 85–104.Google Scholar
2000La formazione delta sistema v2 delie lingue romanze antiche, Lingua e Stile, no. 35, 665–92.Google Scholar
2004La formazione delta struttura di frase romanza: ordine dette parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche, Max Niemeyer, Tbingen.Google Scholar
2011Morphosyntactic persistence, The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (Martin Maiden, John C. Smith, and Adam Ledgeway, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 318–381.Google Scholar
2012On the nature of the v2 system of medieval romance, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Volume 7: Functional Heads (Laura Brug, ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp. 103–111.Google Scholar
Samo, Giuseppe
2018A criterial approach to the cartography of v2, Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian
2004Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: two case studies from 7-up, Sociolinguistic variation: critical reflections (Carmen Fought, ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 121–139.Google Scholar
[ p. 193 ]
Santorini, Beatrice
1989The generalization of the verb-second constraint in the history of yiddish, Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
1992Variation and change in yiddish subordinate corder word order, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, no. 4, 595–640.Google Scholar
1995Two types of verb second in the history of yiddish, Clause Structure and Language Change (Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds.), OUP, New York; Oxford, pp. 53–79.Google Scholar
Scheppers, Frank
2011The colon hypothesis: Word order, discourse segmentation and discourse coherence in ancient greek, VUBPRESS, Brussels.Google Scholar
Schmid, Monika M.
2002First language attrition, use and maintenance: The case of german jews in anglophone countries, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schnenberger, Manuela
2006A glimpse of doubly-filled comps in swiss german, Organizing Grammar: Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk (Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz, and Jan Koster, eds.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 572–581.Google Scholar
Schrijnen, Johannes
1932Charakteristik des altchristlichen lateins, Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie and Stein Vikner
1989All verb-second clauses are cps, Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, no. 43, 27–49.Google Scholar
1996The verb always leaves ip in v2 clauses, Parameters and Functional Heads (Adriana Belletti and Luigi Rizzi, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 11–62.Google Scholar
Serbat, Guy
1996Grammaire fondamentale du latin, vol. VI: L’emploi des cas en Latin, Peeters, Louvain-Paris.Google Scholar
Sigursson, Haldor A.
1989Verbal syntax and case in icelandic, Ph.D. thesis, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Sigursson, Halldor
1990V1 declaratives and verb raising in icelandic, Modern Icelandic Syntax (Joan Malin and Annie Zaenen, eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 24, Academic Press, New York, pp. 41–69.Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy
2007Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality and presupposition, Lingua 117, 1034–1056.Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2011Word order and information structure in old Spanish, Catalan Journal of Linguistics, no. 10, 159–184.Google Scholar
2012A comparative study of word order in old romance, Folia Linguistica 46, no. 2, 553–604.Google Scholar
Skrup, Povl
1975Les premires zones de la proposition en ancien franais: essai de syntaxe de position, Rvue romane. Numro spcial., no. 6, Akademisk forlag, Copenhague.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2005“itinerarium egeriae”: l’ordre des constituents obligatoires, Mnemosyne 58, 235–261.Google Scholar
2010Constituent order in classical latin prose, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, James N.
2015Language acquisition and language change, The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
Starke, Michael
2001Move dissolves into merge: a theory of locality, Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
[ p. 194 ]
Steiner, B. Devon
2010Middle-english influence on late anglo-norman syntax: The effect of imperfect 12 aquisition, New Perspectives on Language Contact and Contact-Induced Change (J. C. Clements, J. F. Seigel, B. D. Steiner, and M. Solon, eds.), IULC Publications, Bloomington, IN, pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
Steiner, B. D.
2014The evolution of information structure and verb second in the history of french, Ph.D. thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Thiersch, Craig L.
1978Topics in german syntax, Ph.D. thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Thomas, Charles
1981Christianity in romain britain to ad 500, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sara G. and Terence Kaufman
1988Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Thrift, Erica
2001Topicalization and topic drop in dutch, Calgary Working Papers Linguistics 23, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thrinsson, Hskuldur
1979On complementation in icelandic, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
1986V1, v2, v3 in icelandic, Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages (Hubert Haider and Martin Prinzhorn, eds.), Foris Publications, Dordrecht, pp. 169–194.Google Scholar
2007The syntax of icelandic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf
1892Stellung des verbums im altfranzsischen, Zeitschrift fr romanische Philologie, no. XVI, 289–307.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra
1995Cases of verb third in old high german, Clause Structure and Language Change (Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 345–369.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1984Parameters and effects of word order variation, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas and Stefano Quaglia
2016Particle topicalisation and german clause structure, The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19, no. 2, 109–141.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2006On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to c in german, Theoretical Linguistics 32, no. 3, 257–306.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2013Gender maintenance and loss in totenmålet, english, and other major germanic varieties, In Search of Universal Grammar (Terje Lohndal, ed.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
Valois, Daniel and Fernande Dupuis
1992On the status of (verbal) traces in french: the case of stylistic inversion, Romance languages and modern linguistic theory (Paul Hirschbhler and E. F. K. Koerner, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 325–338.Google Scholar
Van Coetsem, Franz
2000A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact, Winter, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2009Alternatives to cartography: an introduction, Alternatives to Cartography (Jeroen van Craenenbroeck, ed.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2011The linguistic cycle, Oxford University Press, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1987Syntactic case and morphological case in the history of english, Foris, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 195 ]
Vance, Barbara S.
1989The evolution of pro-drop in medieval french, Studies in Romance Linguistics (Carl Kirschner and Janet Ann DeCesaris, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 413–441.Google Scholar
1993Verb-first declaratives introduced by et and the position of pro in old and middle french, Lingua, no. 89, 281–314.Google Scholar
1995On the decline of verb movement to comp in old and middle french, Clause Structure and Language Change (Adrian Battye and Ian Roberts, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 170–199.Google Scholar
1997Syntactic change in medieval french: Verb-second and null subjects, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, no. 41, Kluwer, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara S., Bryan Donaldson, and B. Devon Steiner
2009V2 loss in old french and old occitan: The role of fronted clauses, Romance Linguistics. Selected Papers from the 39th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Tuscon, Arizona (Colina Sonia, Antxon Olarrea, and Ana Maria Carvalho, eds.), Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 315, John Benjamins, Amsterdam 2009 pp. 301–320.
Vanelli, Laura
1998Ordine delle parole a articolazione pragmatica dell’italiano antico: La ‘prominenca’ pragmatica della prima posizione nella frase, Medioevo Romanzo 2, 229–246.Google Scholar
Vanelli, Laura, Lorenzo Renzi, and Paola Beninc
1983Typologie des pronoms sujets dans les langues romanes, Actes du XVIIme Congrs Internation de Linguistique et Philologie Romanes (Aix-en Provence, 29 aot – 3 septembre) (Aix-en Provence: Universit de Provence), vol. 3 1985 pp. 163–176.
Varvaro, Alberto
2013Latin and the making of the romance languages, The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (A. L. Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, ed.), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 6–56.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo
1972Rule inversion, Lingua, no. 29, 209–242.Google Scholar
1973Explanation in syntax, Syntax and Semantics (John P. Kimball, ed.), vol. 2, Seminar Press, New York, pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
1974Topics, subjects and word order: From sxv to svx via tvx”, Historical Linguistics (John M. Anderson and Charles Jones, eds.), North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp. 339–376.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1982Dpendances et niveaux de reprsentations en syntaxe, Ph.D. thesis, University of Paris VII.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
1999The distinction between epistemic and speech act conjunction, Belgian Essays on Language and Literature, 119–130.Google Scholar
Vial, Eric
1983Les noms de villes et de villages, Belin, Paris.Google Scholar
Vikner, Stein
1995Verb movement and expletive subjects in the germanic languages, OUP, Oxford.Google Scholar
2001Verb movement variation in germanic and optimality theory, Ph.D. thesis, Universitt Tbingen.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1991Verb movement and the licensing of np-positions in the germanic languages, Ph.D. thesis, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Villa-Garca, Julio
2012Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish, Probus 24, no. 2, 257–314.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1977Perceptual factors and word order change in latin, Romance Syntax: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives (Martin Harris, ed.), University of Salford, Salford, pp. 54–68.Google Scholar
[ p. 196 ]
2000Latin, The Romance Languages (Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, eds.), OUP, London and New York, 3th ed., pp. 26–78.Google Scholar
2000Latin, The Romance Languages (Martin Harris and Nigel Vincent, eds.), Routledge, London and New York, pp. 26–78.Google Scholar
Volterra, Virginia and Traute Taeschner
1978The acquisition and development of langage by bilingual children, Journal of Child Language 5, 311–326.Google Scholar
Wartburg, Walther von
1939Die entstehung der romanischen vlker, Niemeyer, Halle-Saale.Google Scholar
1958Evolution et structure de la langue franaise, 5 ed., Prancke, Bern.Google Scholar
Vnnen, Veikki
1987Le journal-ptre d’egrie etude linguistique, Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae, Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1892ber ein gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung, Indogermanische Forschungen, no. 1, 333–436.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic reconstruction and proto-germanic, Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 12, Oxford University Press, Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Verb-third in early west germanic: A comparative perspective, Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological, and Information-Structural Interactions (Theresa Biberauer and George Walkden, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 236–248.Google Scholar
2016V2, Manuscript. University of Manchester, July-August.Google Scholar
2017Language contact and v3 in germanic varieties new and old, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 20, no. 1.Google Scholar
Walkden, George and Hannah Booth
to appear. Reassessing the historical evidence for embedded v2, Rethinking verb second (Theresa Biberauer, Sam Wolfe, and Rebecca Woods eds. Oxford University Press
Wanner, Dieter
1987The development of romance clitic pronouns: From latin to old romance, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1964Preliminaries to the reconstruction of indo-european sentence structure, Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics (The Hague) (Horace G. Lunt, ed.), pp. 1035–1045.
Wechsler, Stephen
1991Verb second and illocutionary force, Views on Phrase Structure (Katherine Leffel and Denis Bouchard, eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 177–191.Google Scholar
Weil, Henri
1887The order of words in the ancient languages compared with that of the modern languages, Ginn & Co, Boston.Google Scholar
Weiss, Helmut
2005Inflected complementizers in continental west germanic dialects, Zeitschrift fr Dialektologie und Linguistik, no. Bd. 72, Heft 2, 148–166.Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael
2015The routledge history of historical linguistics, The Comparative Method (Claire Bowern and Bethwyn Evans, eds.), Routledge, Abingdon and New York, pp. 127–145.Google Scholar
Westbury, Josh
2016Left dislocation: a typological overview, Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 50, 21–45.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2009The acquisition of word order: Micro-cues, information structure, and economy, John Benjamins, Amsterdam. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Microvariation as diachrony: a view from acquisition, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12, no. 1, 49–79.Google Scholar
[ p. 197 ]
Westergaard, Marit and Terje Lohndal
to appear. Verb second word order in norwegian heritage language: Syntax and pragmatics, Variable properties in language: Their nature and acquisition (David Lightfoot and Jon Havenhill eds. Georgetown University Press Washington DC Crossref
Westman, Margarita
1974Bruksprosa, Gleerups Liber Lromedel, Lund.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Frederick
1942 (ed.), La chanson de roland, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
2010In search of the force of dependent verb second, Nordic Journal of Linguistics 33, no. 1, 81–91.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Kristine Benzen, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, and Thorbjrg Hrarsdttir
2009On the distribution and illocution of v2 in Scandinavian that-clauses, Lingua 119, no. 2, 1914–1938.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson, Thorbjrg Hrarsdttir, and Kristine Bentzen
2007Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10, 203–233.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1974Rule ordering in syntax, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2013Medieval Sardinian: New evidence for syntactic change from latin to romance, Historical Linguistics. Selected papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5–9 August 2013 (Amsterdam) (Dag Haug, ed.), John Benjamins 2015 pp. 303–324.
2015Microvariation in medieval romance syntax: A comparative study, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2015The nature of old Spanish verb second reconsidered, Lingua 164, 132–155.Google Scholar
2016A comparative perspective on the evolution of romance clausal structure, Diachronica 33, no. 4, 461–502.Google Scholar
Wright, Roger
1982Late latin and early romance in spain and carolingian france, Cairns, Liverpool.Google Scholar
1991 (ed.), Latin and the romance languages in the early middle ages, Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
2002 (ed.), A sociophilological study of late latin, Brepols, Turnhout. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Periodization, The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages (Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, and Adam Ledgeway, eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 107–124.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne
2014The merge condition a syntactic approach to selection, Minimalism and Beyond (Peter Kosta, Stephen L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork, and Lilia Schrcks, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 139–177.Google Scholar
Yang, Charles
2003Knowledge and learning in natural language, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
1997Contrastive dislocation in dutch and icelandic, Materials on left-dislocation (Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk, and Frans Zwarts, eds.), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 119–148.Google Scholar
Zagona, Karen
1982Government and proper government of verbal projections, Ph.D. thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Zaring, Laurie
2017The nature of v2 in old french: Evidence from subject inversion in embedded clauses, Canadien Journal of Linguistics/Rvue canadienne de linguistique 63, no. 2, 288–308.Google Scholar
[ p. 198 ]
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2004Sentential negation and negative concord (unpublished ph.d thesis), Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael
2009On the evolution of expletive subject pronouns in old french, Proceedings of the workshop ‘Null-subjects,expletives and locatives in Romance.’ Arbeitspapier 123 (Georg A. Kaiser and Eva-Marie Remberger, eds.), Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universitt Konstanz, pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
2014Expletive and referential subject pronouns in medieval french, De Gruyter, Berlin. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael and Georg A. Kaiser
2010Much ado about nothing? on the categorial status of et and ne in medieval french, Corpus 9 (La syntaxe de corpus/Syntax corpus), pp. 265–290.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan Wouter
1991Clitics in dutch: Evidence for the position of infl., Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik, no. 33, 71–92.Google Scholar
1993Dialektsyntax, Clues from dialect syntax: Complementizer agreement (Werner Abraham and Josef Bayer, eds.), Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 5. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, pp. 246–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Morphosyntax of verb movement: a minimalist approach to the syntax of dutch, Kluwer, Dordrecht. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The syntax of dutch, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1977On clitics, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.Google Scholar