Article published In:
Linguistic VariationVol. 12:2 (2012) ► pp.247–291
The influence of community on language structure
Evidence from two young sign languages
By comparing two sign languages of approximately the same age but which arose and developed under different social circumstances, we are able to identify possible relationships between social factors and language structure. We argue that two structural properties of these languages are related to the size and the heterogeneity versus homogeneity of their respective communities: use of space in grammatical structure and degree of lexical and sublexical variability. A third characteristic, the tendency toward single-argument clauses appears to be a function of a different social factor: language age. Our study supports the view that language is not just a structure in the brain, nor is it strictly the domain of the individual. It is very much a socio-cultural artifact. Keywords: community and language structure; sign languages; ISL; ABSL; variation; space; argument structure
Cited by
Cited by 42 other publications
Brentari, Diane, Rabia Ergin, Ann Senghas, Pyeong Whan Cho, Eli Owens & Marie Coppola
2021. Community interactions and phonemic inventories in emerging sign languages. Phonology 38:4 ► pp. 571 ff. 
Cohen-Koka, Shirit, Bracha Nir & Irit Meir
2023. Variation of sign parameters in narrative and expository discourse. Sign Language & Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 218 ff.
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Rose Stamp & Wendy Sandler
2018. Constructing Complexity in a Young Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Dachkovsky, Svetlana, Rose Stamp & Wendy Sandler
2023. Mapping the body to the discourse hierarchy in sign language emergence. Language and Cognition 15:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
de Vos, Connie & Roland Pfau
2015. Sign Language Typology: The Contribution of Rural Sign Languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 265 ff.
Ergin, Rabia, Ann Senghas, Ray Jackendoff & Lila Gleitman
2020. Structural cues for symmetry, asymmetry, and non-symmetry in Central Taurus Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Gil, David
2021. Tense–aspect–mood marking, language-family size and the evolution of predication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
Horton, Laura
2022. Lexical overlap in young sign languages from Guatemala. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1
Jaraisy, Marah & Rose Stamp
2022. The Vulnerability of Emerging Sign Languages: (E)merging Sign Languages?. Languages 7:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
Kastner, Itamar, Irit Meir, Wendy Sandler & Svetlana Dachkovsky
2014. The emergence of embedded structure: insights from Kafr Qasem Sign Language. Frontiers in Psychology 5
Kirby, Simon
2017. Culture and biology in the origins of linguistic structure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24:1 ► pp. 118 ff.
Kockelman, Paul, N. J. Enfield & Jack Sidnell
2014. Process and formation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 183 ff.
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Connie de Vos, Onno Crasborn & Paula Fikkert
2021. Formal variation in the Kata Kolok lexicon. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Lutzenberger, Hannah, Katie Mudd, Rose Stamp & Adam Charles Schembri
2023. The social structure of signing communities and lexical variation: A cross-linguistic comparison of three unrelated sign languages. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 8:1
Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler
2019. Variation and conventionalization in language emergence. In Language Contact, Continuity and Change in the Genesis of Modern Hebrew [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 256], ► pp. 337 ff.
Mudd, Katie
2023. How social structure affects the persistence and features of sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 26:1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Mudd, Katie, Connie de Vos & Bart de Boer
2020. The effect of cultural transmission on shared sign language persistence. Palgrave Communications 6:1
Mudd, Katie, Connie de Vos & Bart de Boer
2022. Shared Context Facilitates Lexical Variation in Sign Language Emergence. Languages 7:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Mudd, Katie, Hannah Lutzenberger, Connie de Vos, Paula Fikkert, Onno Crasborn & Bart de Boer
2020. The effect of sociolinguistic factors on variation in the Kata Kolok lexicon. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:1 ► pp. 53 ff.
O'Shannessy, Carmel & Lucinda Davidson
2020. Language Contact and Change through Child First Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 67 ff.
Palfreyman, Nick
2020. Macro and micro-social variation in Asia-Pacific sign languages. Asia-Pacific Language Variation 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Perlman, Marcus, Rick Dale & Gary Lupyan
2015. Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science 2:8 ► pp. 150152 ff.
Pleyer, Michael
2017. Protolanguage and mechanisms of meaning construal in interaction. Language Sciences 63 ► pp. 69 ff.
Raviv, Limor, Marianne de Heer Kloots & Antje Meyer
2021. What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability. Cognition 210 ► pp. 104620 ff.
Raviv, Limor, Antje Meyer & Shiri Lev-Ari
2019. Larger communities create more systematic languages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286:1907 ► pp. 20191262 ff.
Raviv, Limor, Antje Meyer & Shiri Lev‐Ari
2020. The Role of Social Network Structure in the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Cognitive Science 44:8
Roberts, Gareth, Jirka Lewandowski & Bruno Galantucci
2015. How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality. Cognition 141 ► pp. 52 ff.
Rodrigues, Angélica & Roland Pfau
2023. Language Prejudice and Language Structure: On Missing and Emerging Conjunctions in Libras and Other Sign Languages. In Understanding Linguistic Prejudice, ► pp. 157 ff.
Safar, Josefina
2019. Translanguaging in Yucatec Maya signing communities. Applied Linguistics Review 10:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Sandler, Wendy
2018. The Body as Evidence for the Nature of Language. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Carol Padden & Irit Meir
2014. Language emergence. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 250 ff.
Sandler, Wendy, Gal Belsitzman & Irit Meir
2020. Visual foreign accent in an emerging sign language. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 233 ff.
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo‐Martin
2017. Sign Languages. In The Handbook of Linguistics, ► pp. 371 ff.
Sanz-Sánchez, Israel
2024. Chapter 1. Language acquisition across the lifespan in historical sociolinguistics. In Lifespan Acquisition and Language Change [Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics, 14], ► pp. 2 ff.
Schembri, Adam, Jordan Fenlon, Kearsy Cormier & Trevor Johnston
2018. Sociolinguistic Typology and Sign Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 9
Stamp, Rose & Wendy Sandler
2021. The emergence of referential shift devices in three young sign languages. Lingua 257 ► pp. 103070 ff.
Stoianov, Diane, Diná Souza da Silva, Jó Carlos Neves Freitas, Anderson Almeida-Silva & Andrew Nevins
2022. Comparing Iconicity Trade-Offs in Cena and Libras during a Sign Language Production Task. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 98 ff.
Tkachman, Oksana
2022. Conflation of spatial reference frames in deaf community sign languages. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s1 ► pp. 139 ff.
Tkachman, Oksana & Carla L. Hudson Kam
2020. Measuring lexical and structural conventionalization in young sign languages. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:1-2 ► pp. 208 ff.
Ullrich, Robert
2017. From ‘speech’ to ‘gesture’: The ‘oral’ as norm in ‘language’ research. In Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie [Interdisziplinäre Anthropologie, ], ► pp. 179 ff.
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
2021. Pantomimic fossils in modern human communication. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 376:1824
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.