Cover not available
Article published In:
A micro-perspective on Verb Second in Romance and Germanic
Edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen
[Linguistic Variation 19:1] 2019
► pp. 82–117

On the left periphery of three languages of Northern Italy

New insights into the typology of relaxed V2

| Sapienza University, Rome

Through a focus on the properties of subject-finite verb inversion and XP fronting in three relaxed V2 languages, namely Cimbrian, Ladin and Mòcheno, this paper aims to widen and refine our understanding of relaxed V2 languages, i.e. languages in which the V2 property should be understood in a technical sense as obligatory V-to-C movement, not as a simple description referring to linearisation (Benincà 2006, 2013; Ledgeway 2016). It will be shown that inversion differs across relaxed V2 languages in two ways. In a first subtype, inversion is not associated with any marked pragmatic interpretation of the lexical subject and the subject appears in an A position in the IP area: this type is instantiated by Old Italian (Benincà 2006, Poletto 2014). A second option, instantiated by the languages considered in this paper, is that the lexical subject receives a pragmatically marked interpretation which is encoded in a Functional Projection (FP) in the vP periphery (Belletti 2004, Poletto 2006). This paper confirms that V3/V4 word orders involve the presence of a double articulation for foci and wh-elements, which appear in different positions in the CP layer in relaxed V2 languages (Poletto 2002, Wolfe 2015 a,b). It also contributes to our understanding of the syntax of topics in relaxed V2 languages by showing that (i) topics can be moved to CP and (ii) the movement option is not restricted to main clauses lacking an XP in the left periphery; it also occurs in interrogative clauses (unlike in the relaxed V2 varieties considered in Walkden 2014, 2015).

Keywords: Relativised Minimality, linear restriction, multiple access to CP, movement of the finite verb, Early Romance
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the typology of V2 languages
    • 2.1Germanic and Romance V2
    • 2.2On Germanic inversion in Mòcheno, Ladin and Cimbrian
  • 3.Multiple access to the left periphery in Mòcheno, Ladin and Cimbrian
    • 3.1Fronting of verb arguments in main declarative clauses
      • 3.1.1Co-occurrence of given arguments
      • 3.1.2Co-occurrence of given and new/contrasted arguments
    • 3.2Wh- main interrogative clauses
    • 3.3Interim summary
  • 4.Proposed analysis
    • 4.1Tenets of the analysis
    • 4.2Proposed analysis
      • 4.2.1Main declarative clauses with fronted topics
      • 4.2.2Main interrogative clauses
      • 4.2.3Main declarative clauses with a fronted focus
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 September 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16005.cog
References

References

Abels, Klaus
2012 The Italian Left Periphery: A View from Locality. Linguistic Inquiry. 43 (2). 229–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marianne
1987 Old French, Null Subjects and Verb Second Phenomena. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Backer, Mark
1985 The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 161. 373–415.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin & Christine Meckleborg-Salvesen
2014 Preverbal word order in Old English and Old French. In Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages, 233–269. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004 Aspects of the low IP Area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 21, 16–51. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2013 Caratteristiche del V2 romanzo. Lingue romanze antiche, ladino dolomitico e portoghese. In Ermenegildo Bidese & Federica Cognola (eds.) Introduzione alla linguistica del mòcheno, 65–84. Turin: Rosenberg &Sellier.Google Scholar
2006 A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In: Zanuttini et al. (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in Syntax and Semantics, 53–86. Washington.Google Scholar
2001 The position of Topic and Focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
1995 Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia law. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), Clause Structure and Language Change, 325–344. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1994 La variazione sintattica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
1984 Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 41: 3–19. Reprinted in Benincà, Paola 1994 La Variazione Sintattica, 177–194. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
2004 Topic, Focus and V2. In Luigi, Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 21, 52–75. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1983 On the interaction of root transformations and lexical delective rules. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2003 Verb Second (V2) in Afrikaans: A Minimalist Investigation of Word Order Variation. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Ian Roberts
2015 Rethinking Formal Hierarchies: A Proposed Unification. In: Ur Shlonsky (Ed.), Beyond Functional Sequence, 295–313. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ans van Kemenade
2011 Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics. 101, 17–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo
2008 Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
2011 Das Zimbrische von Giazza: Zeugnisse und Quellen aus einer deutschen Sprachinsel in Oberitalien. Übersetzungen, Hörbeispiele und Bildmaterial zu den von Bruno Schweizer gesammelten Erzählungen / Il Cimbro di Giazza: testimonianze e fonti da un’isola linguistica tedesca in Norditalia. I racconti di Bruno Schweizer con traduzioni, esempi sonori e materiali visivi, Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli
2018 Developing pro-drop: the case of Cimbrian. In Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds.), Understanding null-subjects. A synchronic and diachronic perspective, 52–69. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea, Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli
2012 A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative clauses. In: Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. Vol. 901, Lund: Lund University. 1–20.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli
2005 Formen der “Herausstellung” und Verlust der V2-Restriktion im Zimbrischen. In Ermenegildo Bidese, John Down & Thomas Stolz (eds), Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch, 71–92. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2010 Diachronic Development in Isolation: The Loss of V2 Phenomena in Cimbrian. Linguistische Berichte. 2101. 209–228.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Federica Cognola & Andrea Padovan
2012 Zu einer neuen Verb-Zweit- Typologie in den germanischen Sprachen. In Peter Anreiter, Ivo Hajan & Manfred Kienpointner (eds.), In Simplicitate Complexitas. Festgabe für Barbara Stefan zum 70. Geburtstag, 69–86. Wien: Praesens Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli
2012 A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative causes. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax. 901, 1–20.Google Scholar
2013 Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 191, 47–58.Google Scholar
Bošković, Želikjo
2002 On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 331. 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandtler, Johan
2014 Review of Federica Cognola’s Syntactic Variation and Verb Second: A German Dialect in Northern Italy. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 371. 107–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Philip
1996 Verb second and the A bar Status of Subjects. Studia Linguistica 501. 50–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brody, Michael
2000 Mirror theory. Linguistic Inquiry 311. 29–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999 “Topic”. In Focus – Linguistic Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, P. Bosch and R.v.der Sand (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999 The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Federica Cognola
2018 V2 and (micro)-variation in two Rhaeto-Romance varieties of Northern Italy. In Roberta D’Alessandro & Diego Pescarini (eds.), Advances in Italian Dialectology, 72–106. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Federica, Cognola
2016 On a case of syntactic microvariation in Rhaeto-romance: The verb second rule. Handout of the talk given the Workshop ‘Formal approaches to Romance microvariation’, 49th Annual meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Naples, 31 August – 3 September 2016.
Casalicchio, Jan & Federica Cognola
2015 On the left periphery of relaxed V2 languages: A comparison between Rhaetoromance and Mòcheno. Talk given at X CIDSM Conference, Leiden.
Chomsky, Noam
2001 Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language, 1–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1982 Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1973 Conditions on Transformations. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford/New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2010 Mapping Spatial PPs: An Introduction. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 61, 3–25. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica
(2019) On the classification of Mòcheno and Cimbrian within the typology of V2 languages. Relaxed or reduced V2 languages? In Francesco Costantini (ed.), Syntactic Variation: the View from the German-Language Islands in Northeast Italy, 83–106. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
2016 On asymmetric pro-drop in Old High German and Old Italian. Talk given at the Workshop on Asymmetries between main and embedded clauses, Oslo, 23–24 June 2016.
2015 How to define relaxed V2 languages and how to distinguish them from non-V2 languages: A reply to Brandtler. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 93–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 On asymmetric PRO-DROP in Mòcheno. Pinning down the role of contact in the maintenance of a root-embedded asymmetry. Stuf – Language Typology and Universals- Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 67:4. 511–532.Google Scholar
2013a Syntactic Variation and Verb Second. A German Dialect in Northern Italy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013b Limits of syntactic variation and Universal Grammar. V2, OV/VO and subject pronouns in Mòcheno. Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 191, 59–83.Google Scholar
2011 Acquisizione Plurilingue e Bilinguismo Sbilanciato. Uno Studio sulla Sintassi dei Bambini Mòcheni in Età Prescolare. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Manuela Moroni
2018 Die Kodierung der Informationsstruktur im Fersentalerischen: Die Syntax-Prosodie-Schnittstelle. Germanistische Linguistik – Sonderheft, 79–115.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Roland, Hinterhölzl
2016 On the interaction between V2, subjects and wh-movement in a comparative perspective. Talk given at the 22. Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference, University of Iceland, 20–22 May 2016.
Dell’Aquila, Vittorio & Gabriele, Iannaccaro
2006 Surveys Ladins. Usi linguistici nelle valli Ladine. Trento: Pubblicazioni della Regione Trentino-Alto Adige/Suedtirol.Google Scholar
Fontana, Joseph
1993 Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000 The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On Information Structure. Meaning and Form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi
2009 Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 1191: 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallmann, Peter, Heidi Siller-Rungaldier & Horst Sitta
2013 Sprachen im Vergleich: Deutsch – Ladinisch – Italienisch. Bozen: Istitut Pedagogich Ladin.Google Scholar
Garraffa, Maria & Nino Grillo
2008 Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics 211. 177–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983 “Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction”. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslanguage Study, Talmy Givón (ed), 5–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Cecilia Poletto
2010 Hidden verb second: The case of Cimbrian. In Michael Putnam (ed.), Studies on German-Language Islands, 301–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grillo, Nino
2009 Generalized minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua 1191: 1426–1443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1997 Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP 4 (2). 133–175.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Ciro Greco
2018 “West Flemish V3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 211: 1–56.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Ans van Kemenade
2012 The interaction between syntax, information structure and prosody in word order change. in Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabet Cross Traugott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 803–821. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul & Junker, Marie-Odile
1988 Remarques sur les sujets nuls en subordonnées en ancien et en moyen francais. Revue Québécoise de Linquistique Théorique et Appliquée 7(3). 63–84.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015 Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, 342–382. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995 The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg
2002a Die Verb-Zweit-Stellung im Raetoromanischen. Ein typologischer Vergleich. Ladinia (26–27). 313–334.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A.
2002b Verbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. & Michael, Zimmermann
2011 On the decrease in subject-verb inversion in French declaratives. In Esther Rinke et al. (eds.), The development of grammar: language acquisition and diachronic change, 355–382. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Marit Westergaard
2012 Syntax and Information Structure: Verb- Second variation in Middle-English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José Lopez-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 87–118. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolmer, Agnes
2005 Subjektklitika als Kongruenzmarkierer: Ein Vergleich zwischen bairischen und alemannischen Sprachinseldialekten in Norditalien (Zimbrisch und Walserdeutsch). In: Bidese, Ermenegildo; James Dow & Thomas Stolz (eds.). Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch, 164–189. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2014 Pronomen und Pronominalklitika im Cimbro. Stuttgard: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1976 “Subject, theme, and the speaker’s empathy – A reexamination of relativization phenomena”. In Subject and Topic, C. Li (ed), 417–444. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2005 Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementizer system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(3). 339–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Old Neapolitan word order: some initial observations. In Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi (eds.), Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy, 121–149. Longo, Ravenna.Google Scholar
2008 Satisfying V2 in early Romance: merge vs move. Journal of Linguistics. 44 (02). 437–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 From Latin to Romance. Oxford/New York: OUP.Google Scholar
2016 Late Latin Verb Second: The Sentential Word Order of the Itinerarium Egeriae . To appear in Jaume Mateu Fantanals & Renato Oniga (eds), Generative Approaches to Latin Syntax, special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Molnar, Valéria
2001 Contrast from a contrastive perspective. In Ivana Kruijff-Korbayova and Mark Steedman (eds.), European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information 2001, 99–114.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2005 COMP: a multi-talented category: Evidence from Romance. In Laura Brugè et al. (eds.) Contributions to the 30 Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 185–202. Venice: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2014 Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford/New York: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Parallel phases: A study of the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In Phases of Interpretation [Studies in Generative Grammar 91], Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 261–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 The left periphery of a V2-Rhaetoromance dialect: A new perspective on V2 and V3. In Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Syntactic Microvariation, Amsterdam, August 2000, 214–242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
(2000): The higher functional field. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Alessandra Tomaselli
2002 La sintassi del soggetto nullo nelle isole tedescofone del Veneto: cimbro e sappadino a confronto, in: Gianna Marcato (ed.), La dialettologia oltre il 2001, 237–252. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, Vol. 3, 223–251. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 a Relativized Minimality Effects. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 89–110. Blackwell: Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 b The position of Inter(rogative)P in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
1991 [1996] Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. Geneva Generative Papers 2. Reprinted in Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads, 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
2017 Left Periphery of the Clause: Primarily Illustrated for Italian. In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, II edition. Blackwell Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2004 The C-System in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2 and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, 297–328. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997 Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, 423–460. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996 Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V2. In Ellen Brandner & Gisella Ferraresi (eds.) Language Change and Generative Grammar, 154–167. Linguistische Berichte: Sonderheft 71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Anthony
2003 Liacht as de sproch: grammatica della lingua mochena. Palù del Fersina: Pubblicazioni dell’istituto mòcheno di cultura.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine
2013 Topics and the Left Periphery: A comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic. In Terje Lohndal (ed.), In search of universal grammar: from Old Norse to Zoque, 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine & Kristin Bech
2014 Postverbal subjects in Old English and Old French. Oslo Studies in Language (OSLa). 6(1). 201–228.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2004 La formazione della struttura di frase romanza. Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Il ladino. Schizzo linguistico Verbum 2000 (1). 151–169.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1996 Clitic constructions. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Ann Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Togni, Lucia
1990 Per un’analisi di alcuni fenomeni linguistici del dialetto della Valle del Fersina: Un confronto con la sintassi tedesca. MA thesis, University of Trento.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra
2010 La rilevanza del cimbro per gli studi di sintassi nel quadro teorico della grammatica generativa. In Ermenegildo Bidese (ed.), Il cimbro negli studi di linguistica, 41–59. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
1990 La sintassi del verbo finito nella lingue germaniche. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2006 On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 321: 257–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1989 Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
1997 Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura
1987 I pronomi soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali dal Medio Evo ad oggi. Medioevo Romanzo XIII1. 173–211.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Luigi Rizzi & Julie Frank
2016 Intervention effects and Relativized Minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 1791 (2016) 76–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George
2014 Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Verb-third in early West Germanic: A comparative perspective. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological and Information-structural Interactions, 236–248. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2007 English as a mixed V2 grammar: synchronic word order inconstistencies from the perspective of first language acquisition. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2), 107–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2015a The nature of Old Spanish Verb Second reconsidered. Lingua 1651. 132–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015b Microvariation in Old Italo-Romance Syntax: Evidence from Old Sardinian and Old Sicilian. Archivio glottologico italiano 100 (1), 3–36.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
Discourse particles’. In Semantics (= Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK 33.2 ed. by Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner 2011 2038 Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
Zimmermann, Michael
2015 Expletive and Referential subject pronouns in Medieval French. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cognola, Federica
2022. On the role of information structure in the licensing of null subjects in Old High German. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275], ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Cognola, Federica & Jan Casalicchio
2023. Microvariation in the Distribution of Resumptive Pronouns in the Left Dislocation Construction in Two Tyrolean Dialects of Northern Italy. Languages 8:2 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.