Article published in:
A micro-perspective on Verb Second in Romance and Germanic
Edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen
[Linguistic Variation 19:1] 2019
► pp. 82117

[ p. 111 ]References

Abels, Klaus
2012The Italian Left Periphery: A View from Locality. Linguistic Inquiry. 43 (2). 229–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, Marianne
1987Old French, Null Subjects and Verb Second Phenomena. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
Backer, Mark
1985The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 373–415.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin & Christine Meckleborg-Salvesen
2014Preverbal word order in Old English and Old French. In Kristin Bech & Kristine Gunn Eide (eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages, 233–269. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2004Aspects of the low IP Area. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 2, 16–51. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
2013Caratteristiche del V2 romanzo. Lingue romanze antiche, ladino dolomitico e portoghese. In Ermenegildo Bidese & Federica Cognola (eds.) Introduzione alla linguistica del mòcheno, 65–84. Turin: Rosenberg &Sellier.Google Scholar
2006A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In: Zanuttini et al. (eds.), Crosslinguistic research in Syntax and Semantics, 53–86. Washington.Google Scholar
2001The position of Topic and Focus in the left periphery. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
1995Complement clitics in medieval Romance: The Tobler-Mussafia law. In Adrian Battye & Ian Roberts (eds), Clause Structure and Language Change, 325–344. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1994La variazione sintattica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
1984Un’ipotesi sulla sintassi delle lingue romanze medievali. Quaderni Patavini di Linguistica 4: 3–19. Reprinted in Benincà, Paola 1994 La Variazione Sintattica, 177–194. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cecilia Poletto
2004Topic, Focus and V2. In Luigi, Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, 52–75. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besten, Hans den
1983On the interaction of root transformations and lexical delective rules. In Werner Abraham (ed.), On Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa
2003Verb Second (V2) in Afrikaans: A Minimalist Investigation of Word Order Variation. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Ian Roberts
2015Rethinking Formal Hierarchies: A Proposed Unification. In: Ur Shlonsky (Ed.), Beyond Functional Sequence, 295–313. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Ans van Kemenade
2011Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Journal of Linguistics. 10, 17–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo
2008Die diachronische Syntax des Zimbrischen. Tübingen: Günter Narr.Google Scholar
[ p. 112 ]
2011Das Zimbrische von Giazza: Zeugnisse und Quellen aus einer deutschen Sprachinsel in Oberitalien. Übersetzungen, Hörbeispiele und Bildmaterial zu den von Bruno Schweizer gesammelten Erzählungen / Il Cimbro di Giazza: testimonianze e fonti da un’isola linguistica tedesca in Norditalia. I racconti di Bruno Schweizer con traduzioni, esempi sonori e materiali visivi, Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli
2018Developing pro-drop: the case of Cimbrian. In Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds.), Understanding null-subjects. A synchronic and diachronic perspective, 52–69. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea, Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli
2012A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative clauses. In: Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. Vol. 90, Lund: Lund University. 1–20.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo & Alessandra Tomaselli
2005Formen der “Herausstellung” und Verlust der V2-Restriktion im Zimbrischen. In Ermenegildo Bidese, John Down & Thomas Stolz (eds), Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch, 71–92. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2010Diachronic Development in Isolation: The Loss of V2 Phenomena in Cimbrian. Linguistische Berichte. 210. 209–228.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Federica Cognola & Andrea Padovan
2012Zu einer neuen Verb-Zweit- Typologie in den germanischen Sprachen. In Peter Anreiter, Ivo Hajan & Manfred Kienpointner (eds.), In Simplicitate Complexitas. Festgabe für Barbara Stefan zum 70. Geburtstag, 69–86. Wien: Praesens Verlag.Google Scholar
Bidese, Ermenegildo, Andrea Padovan & Alessandra Tomaselli
2012A binary system of complementizers in Cimbrian relative causes. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax. 90, 1–20.Google Scholar
2013Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 19, 47–58.Google Scholar
Bošković, Želikjo
2002On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33. 351–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brandtler, Johan
2014Review of Federica Cognola’s Syntactic Variation and Verb Second: A German Dialect in Northern Italy. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 37. 107–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Branigan, Philip
1996Verb second and the A bar Status of Subjects. Studia Linguistica 50. 50–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Michael
2000Mirror theory. Linguistic Inquiry 31. 29–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999 “Topic”. In Focus – Linguistic Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, P. Bosch and R.v.der Sand (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns. In Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 145–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Federica Cognola
2018V2 and (micro)-variation in two Rhaeto-Romance varieties of Northern Italy. In Roberta D’Alessandro & Diego Pescarini (eds.), Advances in Italian Dialectology, 72–106. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Federica, Cognola
2016On a case of syntactic microvariation in Rhaeto-romance: The verb second rule. Handout of the talk given the Workshop ‘Formal approaches to Romance microvariation’, 49th Annual meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Naples, 31 August – 3 September 2016.
[ p. 113 ]
Casalicchio, Jan & Federica Cognola
2015On the left periphery of relaxed V2 languages: A comparison between Rhaetoromance and Mòcheno. Talk given at X CIDSM Conference, Leiden.
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: a life in language, 1–53. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1982Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1973Conditions on Transformations. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford/New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi
2010Mapping Spatial PPs: An Introduction. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 6, 3–25. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cognola, Federica
(2019) On the classification of Mòcheno and Cimbrian within the typology of V2 languages. Relaxed or reduced V2 languages? In Francesco Costantini (ed.), Syntactic Variation: the View from the German-Language Islands in Northeast Italy, 83–106. Udine: Forum.Google Scholar
2016On asymmetric pro-drop in Old High German and Old Italian. Talk given at the Workshop on Asymmetries between main and embedded clauses, Oslo, 23–24 June 2016.
2015How to define relaxed V2 languages and how to distinguish them from non-V2 languages: A reply to Brandtler. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38(1). 93–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014On asymmetric PRO-DROP in Mòcheno. Pinning down the role of contact in the maintenance of a root-embedded asymmetry. Stuf – Language Typology and Universals- Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 67:4. 511–532.Google Scholar
2013aSyntactic Variation and Verb Second. A German Dialect in Northern Italy. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bLimits of syntactic variation and Universal Grammar. V2, OV/VO and subject pronouns in Mòcheno. Linguistische Berichte. Sonderheft 19, 59–83.Google Scholar
2011Acquisizione Plurilingue e Bilinguismo Sbilanciato. Uno Studio sulla Sintassi dei Bambini Mòcheni in Età Prescolare. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Manuela Moroni
2018Die Kodierung der Informationsstruktur im Fersentalerischen: Die Syntax-Prosodie-Schnittstelle. Germanistische Linguistik – Sonderheft, 79–115.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica & Roland, Hinterhölzl
2016On the interaction between V2, subjects and wh-movement in a comparative perspective. Talk given at the 22. Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference, University of Iceland, 20–22 May 2016.
Dell’Aquila, Vittorio & Gabriele, Iannaccaro
2006Surveys Ladins. Usi linguistici nelle valli Ladine. Trento: Pubblicazioni della Regione Trentino-Alto Adige/Suedtirol.Google Scholar
Fontana, Joseph
1993Phrase Structure and the Syntax of Clitics in the History of Spanish. University of Pennsylvania PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 114 ]
Frascarelli, Mara & Roland Hinterhölzl
2007Types of topics in German and Italian. In Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds.), On Information Structure. Meaning and Form, 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi
2009Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallmann, Peter, Heidi Siller-Rungaldier & Horst Sitta
2013Sprachen im Vergleich: Deutsch – Ladinisch – Italienisch. Bozen: Istitut Pedagogich Ladin.Google Scholar
Garraffa, Maria & Nino Grillo
2008Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics 21. 177–197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1983 “Topic Continuity in Discourse: An Introduction”. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Crosslanguage Study, Talmy Givón (ed), 5–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Cecilia Poletto
2010Hidden verb second: The case of Cimbrian. In Michael Putnam (ed.), Studies on German-Language Islands, 301–346. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grillo, Nino
2009Generalized minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua 119: 1426–1443. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1997Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP 4 (2). 133–175.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane and Ciro Greco
2018 “West Flemish V3 and the interaction of syntax and discourse.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 21: 1–56.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Ans van Kemenade
2012The interaction between syntax, information structure and prosody in word order change. in Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabet Cross Traugott (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, 803–821. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul & Junker, Marie-Odile
1988Remarques sur les sujets nuls en subordonnées en ancien et en moyen francais. Revue Québécoise de Linquistique Théorique et Appliquée 7(3). 63–84.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb second. In Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds.), An International Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Research, 342–382. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg
2002aDie Verb-Zweit-Stellung im Raetoromanischen. Ein typologischer Vergleich. Ladinia (26–27). 313–334.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A.
2002bVerbstellung und Verbstellungswandel in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg A. & Michael, Zimmermann
2011On the decrease in subject-verb inversion in French declaratives. In Esther Rinke et al. (eds.), The development of grammar: language acquisition and diachronic change, 355–382. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kemenade, Ans van & Marit Westergaard
2012Syntax and Information Structure: Verb- Second variation in Middle-English. In Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José Lopez-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds.), Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, 87–118. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 115 ]
Kolmer, Agnes
2005Subjektklitika als Kongruenzmarkierer: Ein Vergleich zwischen bairischen und alemannischen Sprachinseldialekten in Norditalien (Zimbrisch und Walserdeutsch). In: Bidese, Ermenegildo; James Dow & Thomas Stolz (eds.). Das Zimbrische zwischen Germanisch und Romanisch, 164–189. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2014Pronomen und Pronominalklitika im Cimbro. Stuttgard: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu
1976 “Subject, theme, and the speaker’s empathy – A reexamination of relativization phenomena”. In Subject and Topic, C. Li (ed), 417–444. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2005Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementizer system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(3). 339–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Old Neapolitan word order: some initial observations. In Anna Laura Lepschy & Arturo Tosi (eds.), Histories and Dictionaries of the Languages of Italy, 121–149. Longo, Ravenna.Google Scholar
2008Satisfying V2 in early Romance: merge vs move. Journal of Linguistics. 44 (02). 437–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012From Latin to Romance. Oxford/New York: OUP.Google Scholar
2016Late Latin Verb Second: The Sentential Word Order of the Itinerarium Egeriae . To appear in Jaume Mateu Fantanals & Renato Oniga (eds), Generative Approaches to Latin Syntax, special issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Molnar, Valéria
2001Contrast from a contrastive perspective. In Ivana Kruijff-Korbayova and Mark Steedman (eds.), European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information 2001, 99–114.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2005COMP: a multi-talented category: Evidence from Romance. In Laura Brugè et al. (eds.) Contributions to the 30 Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 185–202. Venice: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2014Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford/New York: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Parallel phases: A study of the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In Phases of Interpretation [Studies in Generative Grammar 91], Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 261–294. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002The left periphery of a V2-Rhaetoromance dialect: A new perspective on V2 and V3. In Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds.), Syntactic Microvariation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Syntactic Microvariation, Amsterdam, August 2000, 214–242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
(2000): The higher functional field. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Alessandra Tomaselli
2002La sintassi del soggetto nullo nelle isole tedescofone del Veneto: cimbro e sappadino a confronto, in: Gianna Marcato (ed.), La dialettologia oltre il 2001, 237–252. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
2004Locality and left periphery. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structure, Vol. 3, 223–251. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2001 aRelativized Minimality Effects. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 89–110. Blackwell: Oxford. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 116 ]
2001 bThe position of Inter(rogative)P in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
1991 [1996]Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. Geneva Generative Papers 2. Reprinted in Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Parameters and Functional Heads, 63–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuliano Bocci
2017Left Periphery of the Clause: Primarily Illustrated for Italian. In Blackwell Companion to Syntax, II edition. Blackwell Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2004The C-System in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2 and the EPP. In Luigi Rizzi (ed.), The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, 297–328. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997Directionality and word order change in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, 423–460. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1996Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V2. In Ellen Brandner & Gisella Ferraresi (eds.) Language Change and Generative Grammar, 154–167. Linguistische Berichte: Sonderheft 7. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, Anthony
2003Liacht as de sproch: grammatica della lingua mochena. Palù del Fersina: Pubblicazioni dell’istituto mòcheno di cultura.Google Scholar
Salvesen, Christine
2013Topics and the Left Periphery: A comparison of Old French and Modern Germanic. In Terje Lohndal (ed.), In search of universal grammar: from Old Norse to Zoque, 131–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvesen, Christine & Kristin Bech
2014Postverbal subjects in Old English and Old French. Oslo Studies in Language (OSLa). 6(1). 201–228.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2004La formazione della struttura di frase romanza. Ordine delle parole e clitici dal latino alle lingue romanze antiche. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2000Il ladino. Schizzo linguistico Verbum 2000 (1). 151–169.Google Scholar
Sportiche, Dominique
1996Clitic constructions. In Johan Rooryck & Laurie Ann Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, 213–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Togni, Lucia
1990Per un’analisi di alcuni fenomeni linguistici del dialetto della Valle del Fersina: Un confronto con la sintassi tedesca. MA thesis, University of Trento.Google Scholar
Tomaselli, Alessandra
2010La rilevanza del cimbro per gli studi di sintassi nel quadro teorico della grammatica generativa. In Ermenegildo Bidese (ed.), Il cimbro negli studi di linguistica, 41–59. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
1990La sintassi del verbo finito nella lingue germaniche. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert
2006On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 257–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Barbara
1989Null Subjects and Syntactic Change in Medieval French. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
1997Syntactic Change in Medieval French. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 117 ]
Vanelli, Laura
1987I pronomi soggetto nei dialetti italiani settentrionali dal Medio Evo ad oggi. Medioevo Romanzo XIII. 173–211.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Villata, Sandra, Luigi Rizzi & Julie Frank
2016Intervention effects and Relativized Minimality: New experimental evidence from graded judgments. Lingua 179 (2016) 76–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Verb-third in early West Germanic: A comparative perspective. In Theresa Biberauer & George Walkden (eds.), Syntax over Time: Lexical, Morphological and Information-structural Interactions, 236–248. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2007English as a mixed V2 grammar: synchronic word order inconstistencies from the perspective of first language acquisition. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 43(2), 107–131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Sam
2015aThe nature of Old Spanish Verb Second reconsidered. Lingua 165. 132–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015bMicrovariation in Old Italo-Romance Syntax: Evidence from Old Sardinian and Old Sicilian. Archivio glottologico italiano 100 (1), 3–36.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
Discourse particles’. In Semantics (= Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft HSK 33.2 ed. by Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn and Paul Portner 2011 2038 Berlin Mouton de Gruyter
Zimmermann, Michael
2015Expletive and Referential subject pronouns in Medieval French. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar