Article published in:
Variation in phonology
Edited by Péter Szigetvári
[Linguistic Variation 20:1] 2020
► pp. 84–101

Conditions on the variable interpretation of |U| in Japanese

| Tohoku Gakuin University
| Tohoku Gakuin University
This paper examines the historical and phonological properties of h in Japanese. It shows that, by analysing a specific case of segmental variation, we not only deepen our understanding of the sound which varies but also shed light on some general characteristics of the sound system as a whole. Using an Element Theory approach (Anderson and Jones 1974; Kaye et al. 1985; Harris and Lindsey 1995; Scheer 1999; Nasukawa 2005; Cyran 2010; Backley 2011), the discussion focuses on the distribution of the element |U|, arguing that |U| is naturally weak in Japanese. This helps explain two idiosyncrasies in Japanese phonology – the restricted distribution of labial consonants and rounded vowels, and the patterning of h with labials.In modern Japanese, labiality is phonologically and phonetically weak. In vowels, u and w are produced without lip rounding, as unrounded [ɯ] and [ɰ]. And in consonants, the labial stop p is banned from certain contexts. These facts point to the inherent weakness of |U| in Japanese, where weakness refers to structural headedness; following Backley and Nasukawa (2009), it is assumed that labials are represented by headed |U| (cf. non-headed |U| in velars). To account for the restricted distribution of labials, it is argued that labiality (headed |U|) is only realised in Japanese if a specific structural condition is met: |U| must co-occur with (i.e. be supported by) another element from the same sub-group of ‘dark’ elements. Thus, the paper exploits the natural division between dark elements {|A|, |U|, |L|} and light elements {|I|, |H|, |Ɂ|}.
Keywords: phonology, elements, Japanese, segmental structure, head-dependency, phonetic interpretation, consonant lenition, historical change
Published online: 21 January 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.16012.bac
References

References

Anderson, John M. and Charles Jones
1974 “Three theses concerning phonological representations”. Journal of Linguistics 10. 1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backley, Phillip
2001 “The stability of geminate consonants”. Studies in Languages and Cultures 14. 61–86.Google Scholar
2011 An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
2012 “Variation in Element Theory”. Language Variation 12(1). 57–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 “Headedness in Element Theory: the case for multiple heads”. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1). 89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Backley, Phillip and Kuniya Nasukawa
2009 “Representing labials and velars: a single ‘dark’ element”. Phonological Studies 12. 3–10.Google Scholar
2010 “Consonant-vowel unity in Element Theory”. Phonological Studies 13. 21–28.Google Scholar
Brockhaus, Wiebke
1992 Final devoicing: principles and parameters. PhD dissertation. University of London (UCL).Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz
1997 Resonance Elements in Phonology: A Study in Munster Irish. Lublin, Poland: Wydawnictwo Folium.Google Scholar
2010 Complexity Scales and Licensing in Phonology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golston, Chris and Harry van der Hulst
1999 “Stricture is structure”. The Derivational Residue in Phonological Optimality Theory, ed. by Ben Hermans and Marc van Oostendorp, 153–173. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1990 “Segmental complexity and phonological government”. Phonology 7. 255–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harris, John and Geoff Lindsey
1995 “The elements of phonological representation”. Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations, ed. by Jacques Durand and Francis Katamba, 34–79. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko and Armin Mester
1999 “The phonological lexicon”. The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, ed. by Natsuko Tsujimura, 62–100. Malden, Massachusetts and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Jean Lowenstamm and Jean-Roger Vergnaud
1985 “The internal structure of phonological representations: a theory of charm and government”. Phonology Yearbook 2. 305–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kula, Nancy
1999 “On the representation of NC clusters in Bemba”. Linguistics in the Netherlands 1999, ed. by Renée van Bezooijen and René Kager, 135–148. John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa
2001 Consonant Strength: Phonological Patterns and Phonetic Manifestations. New York and London: Garland. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2005 A Unified Approach to Nasality and Voicing. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nasukawa, Kuniya and Phillip Backley
2008 “Affrication as a performance device”. Phonological Studies 11. 35–46.Google Scholar
2011 “The internal structure of ‘r’ in Japanese”. Phonological Studies 14. 27–34.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus
2006 The structure of length. PhD dissertation. University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Rennison, John
1987 “Vowel harmony and tridirectional vowel features”. Folia Linguistica 21. 337–354. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rennison, John and Friedrich Neubarth
2003 “An x-bar theory of Government Phonology”. Living on the Edge: 28 Papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye, ed. by Stefan Ploch, 95–130. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Nancy
1997 “Headedness as a means of encoding stricture”. Phonology in Progress – Progress in Phonology, ed. by Geert Booij and Jeroen van der Weijer, 333–365. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
1999 “A theory of consonantal interaction”. Folia Linguistica 32. 201–237.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Geoff
2010 “Auditory representations and the structure of GP2.0”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(4). 381–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1990 The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Szigetvári, Péter
1994 “Coronality, velarity and why they are special”. The Even Yearbook 2. 185–224.Google Scholar
2004 “Manner as a skeletal relation”. Phonologica 2002: Structure and Melody, Proceedings of the 9th International Phonology Meeting, ed. by Friedrich Neubarth, Markus Pöchtrager & John Rennison.Google Scholar
Takayama, Tomoaki
2015 “Historical phonology”. Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology, ed. by Haruo Kubozono, 621–650. Berlin, Boston and Munich: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Williams, Geoff
1998 The phonological basis of speech recognition. PhD dissertation. University of London (SOAS).Google Scholar
Yoshida, Shohei
1989 Some aspects of governing relations in Japanese phonology. PhD dissertation. University of London (SOAS).Google Scholar