A small but growing body of research on English and Dutch has found that pronunciation of affixes in a word form is sensitive to paradigmatic probability – i.e., the probability of using that form over other words in the same morphological paradigm. Yet it remains unclear (a) how paradigmatic probability is best measured; (b) whether an increase in paradigmatic probability leads to phonetic enhancement or reduction; and (c) by what mechanism paradigmatic probability can affect pronunciation. The current work examines pronunciation variation of Russian verbal agreement suffixes. I show that there are two distinct patterns of variation, corresponding to two different measures of paradigmatic probability. One measure, pairwise paradigmatic probability, is associated with a pronunciation pattern that resembles phonetic enhancement. The second measure, lexeme paradigmatic probability, can show enhancement effects, but can also yield reduction effects more similar to those of contextual probability. I propose that these two patterns can be explained in an exemplar model of lexical storage. Reduction effects are the consequence of faster retrieval and encoding of an articulatory target, while effects that resemble enhancement result when the pronunciation target of both members of a pair of competing word forms is shifted towards the more frequent of two.
(2006) Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review, 231, 275–290.
Aylett, M., & Turk, A
(2004) The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31–56.
Aylett, M., & Turk, A
(2006) Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1191, 3048–3058.
Barr, D.J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H.J
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S
(2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7, [URL].
Bell, A., Brenier, J.M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., & Jurafsky, D
(2009) Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 601, 92–111.
Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Gregory, M., & Gildea, D
(2003) Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1001–1024.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D
(2009) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.1, retrieved 31 January 2009 from [URL].
Bürki, A., Ernestus, M., Gendrot., C., Fougeron, C., & Frauenfelder, U
(2011) What affects the presence versus absence of schwa and its duration: A corpus analysis of French connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(6), 3980–3991.
Cohen, C
(2014) Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement. Morphology, 24(4), 291–323.
Corbett, G
(1983) Hierarchies, targets, and controllers: Agreement patterns in Slavic. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Ettlinger, M., & Johnson, K
(2009) Vowel discrimination by English, French and Turkish Speakers: Evidence for an exemplar-based approach to speech perception. Phonetica, 661, 222–242.
Gahl, S
(2008) Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496.
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K
(2012) Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 789–806.
Gregory, M.L., Raymond, W.D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E., & Jurafsky, D
(2000) The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In
Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 35)
(pp. 151–166). Chicago, IL.
Goldinger, S
(1998) Echoes of Echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105(2), 51–279.
Hanique, I., & Ernestus, M
(2011) Final /t/ reduction in Dutch past-participles: The role of word predictability and morphological decomposability. In
Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2011)
(pp. 2849–2852). Florence, Italy.
Hanique, I., & Ernestus, M
(2012) The role of morphology in acoustic reduction. Lingue e linguaggio, 11(2), 147–164.
Hanique, I., Schuppler, B., & Ernestus, M
(2010) Morphological and predictability effects on schwa reduction: The case of Dutch word-initial syllables. In
Proceedings of the 11th Annual conference of the international speech communication association (Interspeech 2010)
(pp. 933–936). Makuhari, Japan.
Hay, J
(2003) Causes and consequences of word structure. New York and London: Routledge.
Hay, J., & Baayen, H
(2002) Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001 (pp. 203–235). Netherlands: Springer.
Johnson, K
(1997) Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J.W. Mullennix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 145–165). San Diego: Academic Press.
Johnson, K
(2007) Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. In M. J. Sole, P. Beddor, & M. Ohala (Eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology. In honor of John Ohala (pp. 25–40). Oxford University Press.
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W.D
Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R.H
(2007) Morphological predictability and acoustic salience of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1211, 2261–2271.
Kuvšinskaja, J.M
(2012) Soglasovanie skazujemogo s podležaščim, vyražennym sčetnym oborotom. Problemy russkoj stilistiki po dannym NKRJ. Online at [URL].
Lieberman, P
(1963) Some effects of semantic and grammatical context on the production and perception of speech. Language and Speech, 6(3), 172–187.
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J
(2012) OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, F., Kostić, A., & Baayen, R.H
(2004) Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition, 941, 1–18.
Padgett, J., & Tabain, M
(2005) Adaptive dispersion theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica, 62(1), 14–54.
Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R.H
(2005) Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica, 621, 146–159.
R Core Team
(2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL [URL].
Schuppler, B., van Dommelen, W.A., Koreman, J., & Ernestus, M
(2012) How linguistic and probabilistic properties of a word affect the realization of its final /t/: Studies at the phonemic and sub-phonemic level. Journal of Phonetics, 401, 595–607.
Tily, H., & Kuperman, V
(2012) Rational phonological lengthening in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 132(6), 3935–3940.
van Son, R., & Pols, L.C.W
(2003) How efficient is speech?
Proceedings of the institute of phonetic sciences, 25 (pp. 171–184). Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
van Son, R.J.J.H., Bolotova, O., Lennes, M., & Pols, L.C.W
(2004) Frequency effects on vowel reduction in three typological different languages (Dutch, Finnish, Russian). In
Proceedings of the 8th International conference on spoken language processing (Interspeech 2004)
(pp. 1277–1280). Jeju Island, South Korea.
2023. The effect of verbal conjugation predictability on speech signal. Morphology 33:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer
2020. Complex Words,
Luef, Eva Maria & Jong-Seung Sun
2020. Wordform-specific frequency effects cause acoustic variation in zero-inflected homophones. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:4 ► pp. 711 ff.
Lõo, Kaidi, Fabian Tomaschek, Pärtel Lippus & Benjamin V. Tucker
2023. Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Effects in Estonian Spontaneous Speech. Language and Speech 66:2 ► pp. 474 ff.
Plag, Ingo, Arne Lohmann, Sonia Ben Hedia & Julia Zimmermann
2020. An S Is an ’S, or Is It? Plural and Genitive Plural Are Not Homophonous. In Complex Words, ► pp. 260 ff.
Stein, Simon David & Ingo Plag
2021. Morpho-Phonetic Effects in Speech Production: Modeling the Acoustic Duration of English Derived Words With Linear Discriminative Learning. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Tang, Kevin & Ryan Bennett
2018. Contextual predictability influences word and morpheme duration in a morphologically complex language (Kaqchikel Mayan). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144:2 ► pp. 997 ff.
TOMASCHEK, FABIAN, INGO PLAG, MIRJAM ERNESTUS & R. HARALD BAAYEN
2021. Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Tomaschek, Fabian & Michael Ramscar
2022. Understanding the Phonetic Characteristics of Speech Under Uncertainty—Implications of the Representation of Linguistic Knowledge in Learning and Processing. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Tomaschek, Fabian, Benjamin V. Tucker, Michael Ramscar & R. Harald Baayen
2021. Paradigmatic enhancement of stem vowels in regular English inflected verb forms. Morphology 31:2 ► pp. 171 ff.
Tucker, Benjamin V. & Yoichi Mukai
2023. Spontaneous Speech,
Zee, Tim, Louis ten Bosch, Ingo Plag & Mirjam Ernestus
2021. Paradigmatic Relations Interact During the Production of Complex Words: Evidence From Variable Plurals in Dutch. Frontiers in Psychology 12
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.