Dissociating morphological and form priming with novel complex word primes
Evidence from masked priming, overt priming, and event-related potentials
Robert Fiorentino | Neurolinguistics & Language Processing Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas
Stephen Politzer-Ahles | Language and Brain Lab; Faculty of Linguistics, Philology and Phonetics; University of Oxford
Natalie S. Pak | Department of Speech-Language-Hearing, University of Kansas
María Teresa Martínez-García | Neurolinguistics & Language Processing Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas
Caitlin Coughlin | Neurolinguistics & Language Processing Laboratory, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas
Recent research suggests that visually-presented words are initially morphologically segmented whenever the letter-string can be exhaustively assigned to existing morphological representations, but not when an exhaustive parse is unavailable; e.g., priming is observed for both hunter → HUNT and brother → BROTH, but not for brothel → BROTH. Few studies have investigated whether this pattern extends to novel complex words, and the results to date (all from novel suffixed words) are mixed. In the current study, we examine whether novel compounds (drugrack → RACK) yield morphological priming which is dissociable from that in novel pseudoembedded words (slegrack → RACK). Using masked priming, we find significant and comparable priming in reaction times for word-final elements of both novel compounds and novel pseudoembedded words. Using overt priming, however, we find greater priming effects (in both reaction times and N400 amplitudes) for novel compounds compared to novel pseudoembedded words. These results are consistent with models assuming across-the-board activation of putative constituents, while also suggesting that morpheme activation may persevere despite the lack of an exhaustive morpheme-based parse when an exhaustive monomorphemic analysis is also unavailable. These findings highlight the critical role of the lexical status of the pseudoembedded prime in dissociating morphological and orthographic priming.
(1999) Stem homograph inhibition and stem allomorphy: Representing and processing inflected forms in a multi-level lexical system. Journal of Memory and Language, 411, 105–123.
Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D., & Bates, D
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 591, 390–412.
Badecker, W., & Allen, M
(2002) Morphological parsing and the perception of lexical identity: A masked priming study of stem-homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 471, 125–144.
Barr, D., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H
(2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 681, 255–278.
Beyersmann, E., Duñabeitia, J.A., Carreiras, M., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A
(2013) Early morphological decomposition of suffixed words: Masked priming evidence with transposed-letter nonword primes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 341, 869–892.
Butterworth, B
(1983) Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language Production, (Vol. 21, pp. 257–294). London: Academic Press.
Bybee, J
(1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 101, 425–455.
Davis, C.J., & Lupker, S.J
(2006) Masked inhibitory priming in English: Evidence for lexical inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 321, 668–687.
Davis, M.H., & Rastle, K
(2010) Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O’Connor, and Moscoso del Prado Martín (2009). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 171, 749–755.
Dominguez, A., de Vega, M., & Barber, H
(2004) Event-related brain potentials elicited by morphological, homographic, orthographic, and semantic priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 161, 598–608.
Feldman, L.B., O’Connor, P.A., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F
(2009) Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 161, 684–691.
Fiorentino, R., Naito-Billen, Y., Bost, J., & Fund-Reznicek, E
(2014) Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 311, 123–146.
Forster, K.I., & Forster, J.C
(2003) DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 351, 116–124.
Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J
(2000) Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 421–444.
Hyönä, J
(2012) The role of visual acuity and segmentation cues in compound word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 188.
Jarema, G., Busson, C., Nikolova, R., Tsapkini, K., & Libben, G
(1999) Processing compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 681, 362–369.
Kuperman, V
(2013) Accentuate the positive: Semantic access in English compounds. Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4, 203.
Lavric, A., Clapp, A., & Rastle, K
(2007) ERP evidence of morphological analysis from orthography: A masked priming study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 191, 866–877.
Lavric, A., Rastle, K., & Clapp, A
(2011) What do fully visible primes and brain potentials reveal about morphological decomposition?Psychophysiology, 481, 676–686.
Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y., & Sandra, D
(1997) Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headednessBrain and Language, 841, 50–64.
Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F
(2005) Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 531, 26–41.
Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Halle, P.A
(2003) Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 181, 313–334.
Makeig, S., Bell, A., Jung, T., & Sejnowski, T
(1996) Independent component analysis of electroencephalographic data. In D. Touretzky, M. Mozer, & M. Hasselmo (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems 8 (pp. 145–151). Cambridge: MIT Press.
McCormick, S.F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M.H
(2008) Is there a ‘fete’ in ‘fetish’? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 581, 307–326.
Medler, D.A., & Binder, J.R
(2005) MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the English language. [URL].
(2011) Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 261, 558–599.
Oldfield, R.C
(1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 91, 97–113.
Pinker, S
(1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.
Rastle, K., & Davis, M.H
(2008) Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language & Cognitive Processes, 231, 942–971.
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K
(2000) Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 151, 507–537.
Rastle, K., Davis, M.H., & New, B
(2004) The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 111, 1090–1098.
2024. Time course of Chinese compound word recognition as revealed by ERP data. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 39:1 ► pp. 55 ff.
Wu, Yan, Yiu-Kei Tsang, Andus Wing-Kuen Wong & Hsuan-Chih Chen
2017. The processing of homographic morphemes in Chinese: an ERP study. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 32:1 ► pp. 102 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.