Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 14:1 (2019) ► pp. 3767


Amenta, S., & Crepaldi, D.
(2012) Morphological processing as we know it: An analytical review of morphological effects in visual word identification. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Audacity Team
(2018) Audacity(R): Free Audio Editor and Recorder. Retrieved from https://​audacityteam​.org
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balling, L. W., & Baayen, R. H.
(2012) Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words. Cognition, 125(1), 80–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J.
(2004) Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 58 ]
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y.
(1995) Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berent, I., Vaknin, V., & Marcus, G. F.
(2007) Roots, stems, and the universality of lexical representations: Evidence from Hebrew. Cognition, 104(2), 254–286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2015) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://​www​.praat​.org
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S.
(2008) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24(3), 127–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M.
(2018) Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burani, C., Dovetto, F. M., Thornton, A. M., & Laudanna, A.
(1997) Accessing and naming affixed pseudo-words. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1996 (pp. 55–72). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C.
(1988) Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28(3), 297–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, J. F.
(2000) Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Casalis, S., Quémart, P., & Duncan, L. G.
(2015) How language affects children’s use of derivational morphology in visual word and pseudoword processing: Evidence from a cross-language study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–10. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, T., & Besner, D.
(1977) Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornič (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., & Davis, C. J.
(2010) Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes. Memory & Cognition, 38(3), 312–321. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. J.
(2005) N-watch: a program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37(1), 65–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, N., Rastle, K., & Ricketts, J.
(2018) Morphological Effects in Visual Word Recognition: Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(4), 645–654. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Benere, J., & Pasquarella, A.
(2013) Reciprocal relationship:Children’s morphological awareness and their reading accuracy across grades 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 49(6), 1113–1126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, S. H., Kieffer, M. J., & Laroche, A.
(2014) The Relation Between Morphological Awareness and Reading Comprehension: Evidence From Mediation and Longitudinal Models. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(6), 432–451. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 59 ]
Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I.
(2000) Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 751–765. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frost, R., Forster, K. I., & Deutsch, A.
(1997) What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 829–856. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gafni, C.
(2015) Child Phonology Analyzer: processing and analyzing transcribed speech. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. (pp. 1–5, paper number 531). Glasgow, UK: the University of Glasgow. ISBN 978-0-85261-941-4Google Scholar
(2019) General Lexicons of Hebrew: Resources for Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Research (version 1.0). Retrieved from https://​chengafni​.wordpress​.com​/resources​/heblex/
Goral, M., & Obler, L. K.
(2003) Root-morpheme processing during word recognition in Hebrew speakers across the adult life span. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and aquisition in languages of semitic, root-based, morphology (pp. 223–242). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., & Quinlan, P. T.
(1990) Orthographic processing in visual word identification. Cognitive Psychology, 560, 517–560. Retrieved from http://​www​.sciencedirect​.com​/science​/article​/pii​/001002859090012S
IBM Corp.
(2012) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Jarvella, R. J., & Wennstedt, O.
(1993) Recognition of partial regularity in words and sentences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34(1), 76–85. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kavé, G., & Levy, Y.
(2004) Preserved Morphological Decomposition in Persons With Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 47(4), 835. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) The Processing of Morphology in Old Age. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 48(6), 1442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keuleers, E.
(2013) vwr: Useful functions for visual word recognition research. R package version 0.3.0. Retrieved from https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/package​=vwr
Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R.
(2012) Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 389–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruk, R. S., & Bergman, K.
(2013) The reciprocal relations between morphological processes and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(1), 10–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B.
(2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laudanna, A., Cermele, A., & Caramazza, A.
(1997) Morpho-lexical Representations in Naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12(1), 49–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Law, J. M., Wouters, J., & Ghesquière, P.
(2015) Morphological Awareness and Its Role in Compensation in Adults with Dyslexia. Dyslexia, 21(3), 254–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 60 ]
Luce, P. A.
(1986) A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 39(3), 155–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luke, S. G.
(2017) Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1494–1502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D.
(1987) Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition, 25(1–2), 71–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Zwitserlood, P.
(1989) Accessing Spoken Words: The Importance of Word Onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 576–585. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norman, T., Degani, T., & Peleg, O.
(2016) Transfer of L1 visual word recognition strategies during early stages of L2 learning: Evidence from Hebrew learners whose first language is either Semitic or Indo-European. Second Language Research, 32(1), 109–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oganyan, M., Wright, R., & Herschensohn, J.
(2018) The role of the root in auditory word recognition of Hebrew. Cortex, 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R. C.
(1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Psychology Software Tools
(2015) E-Prime 2.0. Pittsburgh, PA. Retrieved from http://​www​.pstnet​.com
R Development Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://​www​.r​-project​.org
Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A.
(2005) Manipulating written hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing, 18(3), 231–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ravid, D., & Mashraki, Y. E.
(2007) Prosodic reading, reading comprehension and morphological skills in Hebrew-speaking fourth graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(2), 140–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, R., Cohen, M., Ben-Artzi, E., Sasson, A., & Ravid, D.
(2016) Auditory Morphological Knowledge Among Children With Developmental Dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(2), 140–154. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, R., & Ravid, D.
(2007) Morphological analogies in Hebrew-speaking university students with dyslexia compared with typically developing gradeschoolers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(3), 237–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, R., Schwartz-Nahshon, S., & Nagar, R.
(2011) Effect of phonological and morphological awareness on reading comprehension in Hebrew-speaking adolescents with reading disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(1), 44–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(1975) Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taft, M., Hambly, G., & Kinoshita, S.
(1986) Visual and Auditory Recognition of Prefixed Words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 38(3), 351–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traficante, D., Marcolini, S., Luci, A., Zoccolotti, P., & Burani, C.
(2011) How do roots and suffixes influence reading of pseudowords: A study of young Italian readers with and without dyslexia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(4–6), 777–793. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 61 ]
Velan, H., Deutsch, A., & Frost, R.
(2013) The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: Evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 1143–1152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velan, H., & Frost, R.
(2009) Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 285–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A.
(1999) Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, L. H.
(2000) Auditory Processing of Polymorphemic Pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(2), 255–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yablonski, M., & Ben-Shachar, M.
(2016) The Morpheme Interference Effect in Hebrew. The Mental Lexicon, 11(2), 277–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yablonski, M., Polat, U., Bonneh, Y. S., & Ben-Shachar, M.
(2017) Microsaccades are sensitive to word structure: A novel approach to study language processing. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yablonski, M., Rastle, K., Taylor, J. S. H., & Ben-Shachar, M.
(2019) Structural properties of the ventral reading pathways are associated with morphological processing in adult English readers. Cortex, 116, 268–285. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M.
(2008) Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: a new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Yablonski, Maya & Michal Ben-Shachar
2020. Sensitivity to word structure in adult Hebrew readers is associated with microstructure of the ventral reading pathways. Cortex 128  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.