Article published in:
The Mental Lexicon
Vol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp. 271324
Abercombie, D.
(1967) Elements of general phonetics. Aldine Pub. Company.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Woollams, A., & Bond, R.
(2005) Spelling–sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 53 1, 567–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
(2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of memory and language, 59 (4), 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Balota, D. A., & Abrams, R. A.
(1995) Mental chronometry: beyond onset latencies in the lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 1, 1289–1302.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 671, 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell-Berti, F., & Harris, K. S.
(1981) A temporal model of speech production. Phonetica, 38 1, 9–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(1996) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer, version 3.4. Institute of Phonetic Sciences of the University of Amsterdam, Report, 132 1, 182.Google Scholar
Boersma, P.
(2001) Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5 1, 341–345.Google Scholar
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J. S. S.
(2009) Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24 (3), 127–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y.-R.
(1936) Types of plosives in Chinese. Proc. 2nd Int. Cong. Phonetic Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 106–110.Google Scholar
Cholin, J., Dell, G. S., & Levelt, W. J. M.
(2011) Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 371, 109–122.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M.
(1968) The Sound Pattern of English, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Landon, R., & Ziegler, J.
(2001) DRC: A dual-route cascade model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108 1, 204–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J.
(1989) Analysis of binary data (Vol. 32). Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability.Google Scholar
Dale, R., Kehoe, C., & Spivey, M. J.
(2007) Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35 (1), 15–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eisenhart, C.
(1947) Effects of rounding on grouped data. Selected Techniques of Statistical Analysis (ed. C. Eisenhart, M. Hastay and W. A. Wallis), Chapter 4. New York.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. J.
(1874) On early English pronunciation, part IV, with especial reference to Shakespeare and Chaucer. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Farnetani, E.
(1999) Labial coarticulation. In W. J. Hardcastle & N. Hewlett (Eds.). Coarticulation. Cambridge: University Press, 31–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A.
(1922) On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A, 2221, 309–68.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A.
(1980) Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics, 8 1, 113–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V.
(1964) Lip position in American English vowels. Language and Speech, 7 1, 215–225. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guisan, A., & Zimmermann, N. E.
(2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological modelling, 135 1, 147–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, B. B., Kawamoto, A. H., & Liu, Q.
(2019) Task demands and segment priming effects in the naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45 (5), 807–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, P. A., & Watter, S.
(2008) SayWhen: An automated method for high-accuracy speech onset detection. Behavior Research Methods, 40 1, 744–751. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, T.
(2011) Hail the impossible: p-values, evidence, and likelihood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 52 1, 113–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawamoto, A.
(1999) Incremental encoding and incremental articulation in speech production: Evidence based on response latency and initial segment duration. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 48–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R. M., & Bame, K.
(1998) Initial phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24 1, 862–885.Google Scholar
Kawamoto, A. H., & Kello, C. T.
(1999) Effect of onset cluster complexity in speeded naming: A test of rule-based approaches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25 (2), 361.Google Scholar
Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Lee, R. J., & Grebe, P. R.
(2014) The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: Evidence based on absolute response latencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (12), 2340–2359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A.
(2008) Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 1, 347–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kello, C. T., & Kawamoto, A. H.
(1998) Runword: An IBM-PC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming response. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 30 1, 371–383. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S., Tuller, B., & Harris, K. S.
(1983) A “dynamic pattern” perspective on the control and coordination of movement. In P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech. New York: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullenix, J.
(2002) Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47 1, 145–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krause, P. A., & Kawamoto, A. H.
(2019) Anticipatory mechanisms influence articulation in the form preparation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 451, 319–335.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I.
(1996) The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Laver, J.
(1994) Principles of phonetics, Oxford University Press., Oxford, UK. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Linguistic Phonetics. In M. Aronoff, & J. Rees-Miller (Ed.). The handbook of linguistics, 150–179. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S.
(1999) A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 1, 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q., Holbrook, B., Kawamoto, A. H., & Krause, P.
(2021) Articulatory and acoustic latency data for: Verbal reaction times based on tracking lip movement. Crossref, Harvard Dataverse, V1 UNF:6:hFCN4bSdgCAQ0CSleAYAaQ== [fileUNF]Google Scholar
Liu, Q., & Kawamoto, A.
(2010) Simulating the elimination and enhancement of the plosivity effect in reading aloud. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 32, No. 32).Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Kawamoto, A. H., Payne, K. K., & Dorsey, G. N.
(2018) Anticipatory coarticulation and the minimal planning unit of speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44 1, 139–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, D. L.
(1973) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: P. Zarembka (Ed.). Frontiers in Econometrics, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Mooshammer, C., Goldstein, L., Nam, H., McClure, S., Saltzman, E., & Tiede, M.
(2012) Bridging planning and execution: Temporal planning of syllables. Journal of phonetics, 40 1, 374–389. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nagelkerke, N. J.
(1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78 1, 691–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, J. J.
(1983) The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In: P. F. MacNeilage (Ed.). The production of speech. New York: Springer-Verlag. 189–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997, August). Aerodynamics of phonology. In Proceedings of the Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 92–97.Google Scholar
(2006) Speech aerodynamics. In Brown, Keith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, 21, 684–689. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011, August). Accommodation to the Aerodynamic Voicing Constraint and its Phonological Relevance. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 64–67.Google Scholar
Palo, P., Schaeffler, S., & Scobbie, J. M.
(2015, August). Effect of phonetic onset on acoustic and articulatory speech reaction times studied with tongue ultrasound. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow, 10–14 August 2015. International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Palo, P.
(2019) Measuring pre-speech articulation (Doctoral dissertation, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh).
Passy, P.
(1890) Étude sur les changements phonétiques Firmin-Didot. Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M.
(2007) Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114 1, 273–315. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, J. M.
(1980) The sounds of speech communication. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M.
(2000) Linear mixed-effects models: basic concepts and examples. Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus, 3–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plaut, D., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K.
(1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103 1, 56–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Rastle, K., Croot, K. P., Harrington, J. M., & Coltheart, M.
(2005) Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: Consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31 1, 1083–1095.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H.
(2002) On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28 1, 307–314.Google Scholar
Revelle, W.
(2019) psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, https://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=psych Version = 1.9.12.
Saltzman, E.
(1986) Task dynamic coordination of the speech articulators: A preliminary model. Experimental brain research series, 151, 129–144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saltzman, E., & Kelso, J. A.
(1987) Skilled actions: A task-dynamic approach. Psychological review, 941, 84–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G.
(1989) A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological psychology, 11, 333–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffler, S., Scobbie, J. M., & Schaeffler, F.
(2014, May). Measuring reaction times: vocalisation vs. articulation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Seminar in Speech Production (ISSP 10). [make sure we cite this for no advantage between lip and tongue]Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. A.
(1988) Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL, England: Human Kinetics Publishers.Google Scholar
Spieler, D. H. & Balota, D. A.
(1997) Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level. Psychological Science, 8 1, 411–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E.
(1978) The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting, in G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning. New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K. N.
(1998) Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
(2002) Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111 1, 1872–1891. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, H.
(1877) A handbook of phonetics (Vol. 2). Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tilsen, S., Spincemaille, P., Xu, B., Doerschuk, P., Luh, W. M., Feldman, E., & Wang, Y.
(2016) Anticipatory posturing of the vocal tract reveals dissociation of speech movement plans from linguistic units. PLoS ONE, 11 (1), e0146813. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tricker, A. R.
(1984) Effects of rounding on the moments of a probability distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 33 (4), 381–390.Google Scholar
Tyler, M. D., Tyler, L., & Burnham, D. K.
(2005) The delayed trigger voice key: An improved analogue voice key for psycholinguistic research. Behavior Research Methods, 37 1, 139–147. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Linden, L., Riès, S. K., Legou, T., Burle, B., Malfait, N., & Alario, F.
(2014) A comparison of two procedures for verbal response time fractionation. Frontiers in psychology, 5 1, 1213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar