Article published In:
The Mental LexiconVol. 16:2/3 (2021) ► pp.397–421
Learning beyond words
Morphology and the encoding of hierarchical categories
Learning multimorphemic words involves the simultaneous learning of two hierarchically organized categories. In such words, sub-lexical units usually encode superordinate categories, whereas whole words encode exemplars of these categories. Complex, non-linear word structure is common in Semitic languages and can be used to probe the learning of multiple form-meaning associations. The aim of this study was to investigate how well Hebrew-speaking adults learn the dual form-meaning relationships that reflect different categorical levels following a few exposures to novel Hebrew-like words. Twenty-four native Hebrew-speakers were exposed to novel words through an interactive video story. Following a few exposures to the words, the learning of the exemplars was tested in a three-alternative-forced-choice identification test. The learning of the sub-lexical morphemes and the categories they encode were tested in generalization tests. The results show that a few exposures to novel, morphologically and conceptually complex words are sufficient to allow unsupervised simultaneous learning of two hierarchical categories even though the superordinate was not explicitly represented in the input.
Keywords: word learning, form-meaning relationship, Semitic, morphology, superordinate category, category learning
Article outline
- Learning hierarchical multiple form-meaning associations
- Nonlinear morphology and the encoding of meaning
- The current study
- Methods
- Participants
- Stimuli
- General overview of the experimental procedure
- Design
- Exposure phase
- Test phase
- Exemplar learning test
- Conceptual generalization test
- Morphological generalization test
- Data analysis
- Results
- Exemplar learning test
- Conceptual generalization test
- Morphological generalization test
- Discussion
- Learning form-meaning relationships at the word level
- Learning superordinate categories encoded morphologically
- Notes
-
References
References
Ambridge, B.
(2020a) Against
stored abstractions: A radical exemplar model of language acquisition. First
Language,
40
(5–6), 509–559. 
(2020b) Abstractions
made of exemplars or ‘You’re all right, and I’ve changed my mind’: Response to
commentators. First
Language,
40
(5–6), 640–659.
Anglin, J. M.
(1977) Word,
object, and conceptual development. Norton & Co.
Aronoff, M.
(2007) Language:
Between words and grammar. In G. Jarema & G. Libben, G. (Eds.), The
mental lexicon: Core
perspectives (pp. 55–79). Brill.
Bachra, B. N.
(2001) The
phonological structure of the verbal roots in Arabic and
Hebrew (Vol. 341). Brill.
Baldwin, D. A.
(1993) Early
referential understanding: Infants’ ability to recognize referential acts for what they
are. Developmental
Psychology,
29
(5), 832.
Banai, K., Nir, B., Moav-Scheff, R., & Bar-Ziv, N.
(2020) A
role for incidental auditory learning in auditory-visual word learning among kindergarten
children. Journal of
Vision,
20
(3), 4–4.
Berman, R. A.
(2013) Modern
Hebrew. In R. Hetzron (Ed.), The
Semitic
languages (pp. 312–333). Routledge.
Berman, R., & Seroussi, B.
(2011) Derived
nouns in Modern Hebrew: Structural and psycholinguistic perspectives. Italian Journal of
Linguistics,
23
(1), 105–125.
Bloom, P.
(2000) How
children learn the meanings of
words (Vol. 3771). MIT Press.
Bloom, P., & Markson, L.
(1998) Capacities
underlying word learning. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,
2
(2), 67–73.
Chen, C. H., Zhang, Y., & Yu, C.
(2018) Learning
object names at different hierarchical levels using cross-situational statistics. Cognitive
Science,
42
1, 591–605.
Gelman, S. A., & O’Reilly, A. W.
(1988) Children’s
inductive inferences within superordinate categories: The role of language and category
structure. Child
Development,
59
(4), 876–887.
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C., & Fitch, W. T.
(2002) Motion
events in language and
cognition. Cognition,
83
(1), 49–79.
Goldinger, S. D.
(1996) Words
and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
22
(5), 1166.
Gupta, P.
(2003) Examining
the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in
adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section
A,
56
(7), 1213–1236.
Hall, D. G.
(1991) Acquiring
proper nouns for familiar and unfamiliar animate objects: Two-year-olds’ word-learning
biases. Child
Development,
62
(5), 1142–1154.
Horton, M. S., & Markman, E. M.
(1980) Developmental
differences in the acquisition of basic and superordinate categories. Child
Development, 708–719.
Huang, Y. T., & Arnold, A. R.
(2016) Word
learning in linguistic context: Processing and Memory
Effects. Cognition,
156
1, 71–87.
Jaeger, T. F.
(2008) Categorical
data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal
of Memory and
Language,
59
(4), 434–446.
Labov, W.
(1972) The
transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In W. Labov, Language
in The Inner
City (pp. 354–396). University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lieber, R.
(2005) English
word-formation processes. In P. Stekauer, & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook
of
word-formation (pp. 375–427). Springer.
Lupyan, G.
(2012) Linguistically
modulated perception and cognition: the label-feedback hypothesis. Frontiers in
Psychology,
3
1.
Lupyan, G., Rakison, D. H., & McClelland, J. L.
(2007) Language
is not just for talking: Redundant labels facilitate learning of novel
categories. Psychological
Science,
18
(12), 1077–1083.
Markman, A. B., & Wisniewski, E. J.
(1997) Similar
and different: The differentiation of basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
23
(1), 54–70.
Mather, E., & Plunkett, K.
(2012) The
role of novelty in early word learning. Cognitive
Science,
36
(7), 1157–1177.
Maxfield, J. T., & Zelinsky, G. J.
(2012) Searching
through the hierarchy: How level of target categorization affects visual search. Visual
Cognition,
20
(10), 1153–1163.
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G. F.
(1988) Children’s
use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive
Psychology,
20
(2), 121–157.
Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E.
(1981) Categorization
of natural objects. Annual Review of
Psychology,
32
(1), 89–115.
Minda, J. P., Desroches, A. S., & Church, B. A.
(2008) Learning
rule-described and non-rule-described categories: a comparison of children and adults. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
34
(6), 1518–1533.
Moav-Scheff, R., Yifat, R., & Banai, K.
(2015) Phonological
memory and word learning deficits in children with specific language impairment: A role for perceptual
context?. Research in Developmental
Disabilities,
45
1, 384–399.
Muchnik, M.
(2017) Personal
names in Modern Hebrew: A morphosyntactic and gender analysis. Folia
Linguistica,
51
(2), 369–390.
Murphy, G.
(2004) The
big book of concepts. MIT Press.
Murphy, G. L., & Brownell, H. H.
(1985) Category
differentiation in object recognition: typicality constraints on the basic category
advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
11
(1), 70–84.
Murphy, G. L., & Wisniewski, E. J.
(1989) Categorizing
objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
15
(4), 572–586.
Nazzi, T., & Gopnik, A.
(2001) Linguistic
and cognitive abilities in infancy: When does language become a tool for
categorization?. Cognition,
80
(3), B11–B20.
Nosofsky, R. M.
(1986) Attention,
similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental
Psychology:
General,
115
(1), 39–57.
Ravid, D.
(2003) A
developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. Language
Acquisition and Language
Disorders,
28
1, 293–320.
(2006) Word-level
morphology: A psycholinguistic perspective on linear formation in Hebrew
nominals. Morphology,
16
(1), 127–148.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P.
(1976) Basic
objects in natural categories. Cognitive
Psychology,
8
(3), 382–439.
Rosenhouse, J.
(2002) Personal
names in Hebrew and Arabic: Modern trends compared to the past. Journal of Semitic
Studies,
47
(1), 97–114.
Share, D. L.
(1999) Phonological
recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of
Experimental Child
Psychology,
72
(2), 95–129.
Share, D. L., & Shalev, C.
(2004) Self-teaching
in normal and disabled readers. Reading and
Writing,
17
(7–8), 769–800.
Shatil, N.
(2006) The
Hebrew noun system: A structural cognitive perspective. Lĕšonénu: A Journal for the Study of
the Hebrew Language and Cognate
Subjects,
68
1, 243–282.
Shimron, J.
(2003) Semitic
languages: Are they really root-based?. Language Acquisition and Language
Disorders,
28
1, 1–28.
Sloat, C.
(1969) Proper
nouns in
English. Language,
45
(1), 26–30.
Slobin, D. I.
(2005) Linguistic
representations of motion events: What is signifier and what is
signified. In C. Maeder, O. Fischer, & W. Herlofsky (Eds.), Iconicity
inside out: Iconicity in language and
literature (pp. 307–322). John Benjamins.
Slobin, Dan. I.
(2006) What makes manner of motion
salient. Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and
cognition. In M. H. S. Robert (Ed.), Space
in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories. John Benjamins.
Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., & Landau, B.
(1996) Naming
in young children: A dumb attentional
mechanism?. Cognition,
60
(2), 143–171.
Stošić, D.
(2013) Manner
of motion, evaluative and pluractional morphology. Space in South Slavic. Oslo Studies in
Language,
5
(1), 61–89.
Taft, M., & Forster, K. I.
(1975) Lexical
storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior,
14
1, 638–647.
Talmy, L.
(1991) Path
to realization: a typology of event integration. Buffalo Papers in
Linguistics,
91
(1), 147–187.
Tamminen, J., Davis, M. H., Merkx, M., & Rastle, K.
(2012) The
role of memory consolidation in generalisation of new linguistic
information. Cognition,
125
(1), 107–112.
Tamminen, J., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K.
(2015) From
specific examples to general knowledge in language learning. Cognitive
Psychology,
79
1, 1–39.
Tomasello, M., & Akhtar, N.
(1995) Two-year-olds
use pragmatic cues to differentiate reference to objects and actions. Cognitive
Development,
10
(2), 201–224.
Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, S. A.
(2009) Early
word-learning entails reference, not merely associations. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,
13
(6), 258–263.
Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. B.
(2007) Word
learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological
Review,
114
(2), 245.
Yablonski, M., Ben-Shachar, M.
(2018) The
morpheme interference effect in Hebrew: A generalization across the verbal and domains. The
Mental
Lexicon,
11
(2),277–307.