Article published In:
Metaphor and the Social WorldVol. 1:1 (2011) ► pp.26–52
Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate?
A question of human consciousness and action
Some metaphor scholars have proposed that certain notable metaphorical expressions in speech and writing may have been deliberately composed, and quite consciously employed for their special rhetorical purposes. Deliberate metaphors are different from conventional ones, which are typically produced automatically and thoughtlessly, something that speakers and listeners, authors and readers, tacitly recognize when they engage in metaphoric discourse. This article explores some of these common assumptions about deliberate metaphor in light of contemporary research in cognitive science on meaning, consciousness and human action. My claim is that deliberate metaphors, contrary to the popular view, may not be as ‘deliberate’ in their creation and use as is traditionally believed, and therefore are not essentially different from other forms of metaphoric language. Moreover, engaging in deliberative thought processes is often exactly the wrong way to create novel, apt verbal metaphors.
Cited by
Cited by 64 other publications
Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2017. Chapter 6. If-clauses and their figurative basis. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 152 ff. 
Barnden, John A.
2012. Metaphor and Simile: Fallacies Concerning Comparison, Ellipsis, and Inter-Paraphrase. Metaphor and Symbol 27:4 ► pp. 265 ff.
Beger, Anke
2019. The contested notion of ‘deliberate metaphor’: What can we learn from ‘unclear’ cases in academic lectures?. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 7:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Benczes, Réka
2013. The Role of Alliteration and Rhyme in Novel Metaphorical and Metonymical Compounds. Metaphor and Symbol 28:3 ► pp. 167 ff.
Caballero, Rosario
2013. The Role of Metaphor in Architects' Negotiation and (Re)Construction of Knowledge Across Genres. Metaphor and Symbol 28:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Cibulskienė, Jurga
Cienki, Alan
2020. A multimodal perspective on MCA. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 63 ff.
Cotton, Matthew, Ralf Barkemeyer, Barbara Gabriella Renzi & Giulio Napolitano
2019. Fracking and metaphor: Analysing newspaper discourse in the USA, Australia and the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics 166 ► pp. 106426 ff.
Dewandre, Nicole G. & Orsolya Gulyas
2017. Critical Metaphor Analysis of EU Policy Documents between 1985 and 2014. SSRN Electronic Journal
Dewandre*
, Nicole & Orsolya Gulyás
2018. Sensitive economic personae and functional human beings. Journal of Language and Politics 17:6 ► pp. 831 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla
2020. A typological framework of attention-drawing strategies for Ancient Egyptian metaphorical language. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 39 ff.
Di Biase-Dyson, Camilla & Markus Egg
2020. Drawing attention to metaphor. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 1 ff.
Dobrovol’skij, Dmitrij
2021. On some specific features of conventional figurative language (Acerca de algunas características específicas del lenguaje figurado convencional). Studies in Psychology 42:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
Ervas, Francesca, Pietro Salis, Cristina Sechi & Rachele Fanari
2022. Exploring metaphor's communicative effects in reasoning on vaccination. Frontiers in Psychology 13
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2011. Multiple Constraints in Theories of Metaphor. Discourse Processes 48:8 ► pp. 575 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2012. Are ironic acts deliberate?. Journal of Pragmatics 44:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2015. Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?. Journal of Pragmatics 90 ► pp. 73 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W.
2015. Do pragmatic signals affect conventional metaphor understanding? A failed test of deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics 90 ► pp. 77 ff.
Gibbs, Raymond W. & Elaine Chen
2017. Taking metaphor studies back to the Stone Age: A reply to Xu, Zhang, and Wu (2016). Intercultural Pragmatics 14:1
Hampe, Beate
2022. Between embodiment and usage. In Dynamism in Metaphor and Beyond [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 9], ► pp. 157 ff.
Heyvaert, Pauline
2019. Chapter 2. Fairies, Christmas miracles and sham marriages. In Variation in Political Metaphor [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 85], ► pp. 35 ff.
Horn, Fabian
2020. “Entering the house of Hades”. In Drawing Attention to Metaphor [Figurative Thought and Language, 5], ► pp. 159 ff.
Horton, William S.
2013. Character Intimacy Influences the Processing of Metaphoric Utterances During Narrative Comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol 28:3 ► pp. 148 ff.
Julich-Warpakowski, Nina & Paula Pérez Sobrino
Keating, John
2021. Populist discourse and active metaphors in the 2016 US presidential elections. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 499 ff.
Lancaster, Mason D.
2021. Metaphor Research and the Hebrew Bible. Currents in Biblical Research 19:3 ► pp. 235 ff.
Lemghari, El Mustapha
Lemghari, El Mustapha
2022. On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Li, Ke & Huichao Zhu
2021. Power and gender. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 12:2 ► pp. 238 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette
2015. Metaphor in specialist discourse. In Metaphor in Specialist Discourse [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 4], ► pp. 299 ff.
Littlemore, Jeannette, Tina Krennmayr, James Turner & Sarah Turner
2014. An Investigation into Metaphor Use at Different Levels of Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics 35:2 ► pp. 117 ff.
Milică, Ioan
2020. Biblioteca naturii: realitate și metaforă în clasificarea botanică. Diacronia :11
Milică, Ioan
2020. The library of nature: reality and metaphor in the botanical classification. Diacronia :11
Muelas-Gil, María
2022. Review of Di Biase-Dyson & Egg (2020): Drawing Attention to Metaphor. Metaphor and the Social World 12:2 ► pp. 340 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 3:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2016. Cross-cultural variation in deliberate metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and the Social World 6:2 ► pp. 205 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2017. Analiza scenariuszy metaforycznych w ramach lingwistyki kulturowej. In Lingwistyka kulturowa i międzykulturowa. Antologia,
Musolff, Andreas
2017. Metaphor and Cultural Cognition. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 325 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2019. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 151 ► pp. 62 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2020. Metaphor production and metaphor interpretation. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 85 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2021. Figurative Conceptualisations of the Nation(-State). In National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic [Cultural Linguistics, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Musolff, Andreas
2022. Universality and/or Cultural Specificity of Metaphors and Analogies? NATIONS as BODIES/PERSONS. In Metaphors and Analogies in Sciences and Humanities [Synthese Library, 453], ► pp. 401 ff.
Negrea-Busuioc, Elena & L. David Ritchie
Ng, Carl Jon Way & Veronika Koller
2013. Deliberate Conventional Metaphor in Images: The Case of Corporate Branding Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 28:3 ► pp. 131 ff.
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps
2015. Folle machine ou solide relation « living apart together » ?. Mots :109 ► pp. 125 ff.
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps
2015. Special issue on the political impact of metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World 5:2 ► pp. 165 ff.
Perrez, Julien & Min Reuchamps
2015. A crazy machine or a strong “living apart together” relationship?. Mots :109
Reijnierse, W. Gudrun, Christian Burgers, Tina Krennmayr & Gerard J. Steen
2018. DMIP: A Method for Identifying Potentially Deliberate Metaphor in Language Use. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 129 ff.
Ritchie, L. David & Elena Negrea-Busuioc
Salis, Pietro & Francesca Ervas
2021. Evidence, Defeasibility, and Metaphors in Diagnosis and Diagnosis Communication. Topoi 40:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
Schoor, Carola
2015. Political metaphor, a matter of purposeful style. Metaphor and the Social World 5:1 ► pp. 82 ff.
Semino, Elena, Alice Deignan & Jeannette Littlemore
2013. Metaphor, Genre, and Recontextualization. Metaphor and Symbol 28:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2015. Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics 90 ► pp. 67 ff.
Steen, Gerard
2017. Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Tay, Dennis
2016. A variational approach to deliberate metaphors. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Thonus, Terese & Beth L. Hewett
Vereza, Solange
2021. The fabric of metaphor in discourse. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 339 ff.
Wang, Juanjuan, Jiajun Du, Ting Zheng & Yi Sun
2023. The Psychological Reality of Chinese Deliberate Metaphors from the Reception Side: An Experimental Approach. Brain Sciences 13:2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Zibin, Aseel
2022. The type and function of metaphors in Jordanian economic discourse: A critical metaphor analysis approach. Language Sciences 93 ► pp. 101488 ff.
Šeškauskienė, Inesa
2018. Musolff, A. (2016).Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. Metaphor and the Social World 8:1 ► pp. 150 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.