Article published in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 11:1 (2021) ► pp. 143170
References

References

Barkat-Defradas, M., & Motte-Florac, E.
(Eds.) (2016) Words for odours: Language skills and cultural insights. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L., Schmidt, L. A., & Phillips, W.
(2003) Sex, syntax, and semantics. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in the mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 61–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cain, W. S.
(2012) History of research on smell. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.), Handbook of perception. Volume VIa: Tasting and smelling (pp. 197–229). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chastrette, M.
(2002) Classification of odors and structure–odor relationships. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 110–116). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C., Howes, D., & Synnott, A.
(2003) Aroma: The cultural history of smell. First published 1994 by Routledge, London; this edition published in Taylor & Francis e-Library.Google Scholar
Crisp, P.
(2008) Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough? Language and Literature, 17(4), 291–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E.
(2014) Figurative language. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, E. K.
(2018) A deep semantic corpus-based approach to metaphor analysis. In M. R. L. Petruck (Ed.) MetaNet (pp. 127–165). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
[ p. 163 ]
Fillmore, C. J.
(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistics Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Co.Google Scholar
(1985) Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), 222–254.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W.
(2016) Mixing metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Metaphor wars. Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., & Cameron, L.
(2008) The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1–2), 64–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Golub, I. B.
(2010) Stilistika russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Ajris Press.Google Scholar
Holz, P.
(2007) Cognition, olfaction and linguistic creativity. Linguistic synesthesia as poetic device in cologne advertising. In M. Plümacher & P. Holz (Eds.), Speaking of colors and odors (pp. 185–202). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Howes, D.
(2002) Nose-wise: Olfactory metaphors in mind. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 67–81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R., & Distel, H.
(2002) The individuality of odor perception. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition. (pp. 408–420). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimmel, M.
(2010) Why we mix metaphors (and mix them well): Discourse coherence, conceptual metaphor, and beyond. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 97–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Knudsen, S.
(2003) Scientific metaphors going public. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(8), 1247–1263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2004) Businesswoman and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious?’ Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(1), 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köster, E.
(2002) The specific characteristics of the sense of smell. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition. (pp. 27–43). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2005) Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Variation in metaphor. Iha do Desterro. A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, 53, 13–40.Google Scholar
(2016) A view of “mixed metaphors” within a conceptual metaphor theory framework. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kozhina, M. N., Duskaeva, L. R., & Salimovsky, V. A.
(2008) Stilistika russkogo jazyka. Moscow: Flinta-Nauka.Google Scholar
Kurkowska, H., & Skorupka, S.
(1959) Stylistyka polska: zarys. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(2008 [1980]) Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(2014) Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 958, 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 164 ]
Le Guérer, A.
(2002) Olfaction and cognition: A philosophical and psychoanalytic view. In C. Rouby, B. Schaal, D. Dubois, R. Gervais, & A. Holley (Eds.), Olfaction, taste, and cognition (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marhula, J., & Rosiński, M.
(2017) Co oferuje MIPVU jako metoda identyfikacji metafory? Polonica, 37, 23–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martinez, I. M., & Shatz, M.
(1996) Linguistic influences on categorization in preschool children: A crosslinguistic study. Journal of Child Language, 23, 529–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. E.
(2011) Ego-perspective and field-based frames of reference: Temporal meanings of FRONT in Japanese, Wolof, and Aymara. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(3), 759–776. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C.
(2016) Why mixed metaphors make sense. In Gibbs, R. W. (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 31–56). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
(2017) Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in multimodal discourse. In B. Hempe (Ed.), Metaphor. Embodied cognition and discourse (pp. 297–316). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, W., Fleischhauer, J., Bücker, P., & Beseoglu, H.
(2008) A frame-based analysis of synaesthetic metaphors. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication, 3(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Pragglejaz Group
(2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rączaszek-Leonardi, J.
(2011) Zjednoczeni w mowie: Względność językowa w ujęciu dynamicznym. Warsaw: Scholar.Google Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from: https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Rey-Debove, J., & Rey, A.
(2000) Le nouveau petit Robert: Dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue francaise. Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert.Google Scholar
Ritchie, L. D.
(2017) Metaphorical stories in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, Ch. R., Baker, C. F., & Scheffczyk, J.
(2016) FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Retrieved from: https://​framenet2​.icsi​.berkeley​.edu​/docs​/r1​.7​/book​.pdf
Semino, E.
(2008) Metaphor in discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sera, M., Berge, C., & del Castillo-Pintado, J.
(1994) Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers. Cognitive Development, 9, 261–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, P.
(2004) Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Snævarr, S.
(2010) Metaphors, narratives, emotions: Their interplay and impact. Amsterdam: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G.
(2015) Developing, testing and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T.
(2010) A method for linguistic metaphor identification. From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 165 ]
Stickles, E., David, O., Dodge, E. K., & Hong, J.
(2016a) Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory. Constructions and frames, 8(2), 166–213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stickles, E., David, O., & Sweetser, E.
(2016b) Grammatical constructions, frame structure, and metonymy: Their contributions to metaphor computation. In A. Healey, R. N. de Souza, P. Peškov, & M. Allen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th meeting of the High Desert Linguistics Society (pp. 317–345). Albuquerque, NM: High Desert Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sullivan, K.
(2006) Frame-based constraints on lexical choice in metaphor. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 32(1), 387–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Mixed metaphors. Their use and abuse. London: Bloomsbury. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Velasco-Sacristán, M., & Fuertes-Olivera, P. A.
(2006) Olfactory and olfactory-mixed metaphors in print ads of perfume. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 217–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Paganelli, F., & Dworzynski, K.
(2005) Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 501–520. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Werning, M., Fleischhauer, J., & Beseoglu, H.
(2006) The cognitive accessibility of synaesthetic metaphors. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty eighth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2365–70). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Werth, P.
(1994) Extended metaphor – A text-world account. Language and Literature, 3(2), 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, R. M.
(1996) The structure of metaphor. The way the language of metaphor works. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Winter, B.
(2016) The sensory structure of the English lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Merced.Google Scholar
(2019) Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zawisławska, M.
(2019) Metaphor and senses: The Synamet Corpus: A Polish resource for synesthetic metaphors. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Zdunkiewicz-Jedynak, D.
(2010) Wykłady ze stylistyki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Ziem, A.
(2014) Frames of understanding in text and discourse: Theoretical foundations and descriptive applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar