Article in:
Metaphor and the Social World
Vol. 12:2 (2022) ► pp. 270291
References
Arhipova, E. M.
(2010) Tost kak pervichnyi rechevoi janr v sovremennoi kontseptsii naychnogo znaniya [Toast as a primary speech genre in the modern concept of scientific knowledge]. Naychnaya mysl Kavkaza [Scientific thought of the Caucasus], 31, 151–155.Google Scholar
Aytmatov, Ch.
(1998) I dol’she veka dlitsya den’… [And the day lasts more than a century…]. Hudozhestvennaya literatura [Artistic literature].Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1986) Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Iskusstvo [Art].Google Scholar
Banerjee, R.
(2017) Does Time Matter? – A Study of Participation of Women in Urban Governance. Space and Culture, India, 4 (3), 62–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayburin, A. K.
(1983) Zhilishche v obryadah i predstavleniyah vostochnyh slavyan [Dwelling in the rites and performances of the Eastern Slavs]. Leningrad.Google Scholar
Bekberdinova, G. M.
(2018) Vnutrennee prostranstvo i simvolika kazahskoj yurty [Internal space and symbolism of the Kazakh yurt]. Vostochno-Kazakhstanskiy oblastnoy arkhitekturno-etnograficheskiy i prirodno-landshaftnyy muzey [East Kazakhstan Regional Architectural, Ethnographic and Natural Landscape Museum]. Retrieved from http://​www​.vkoem​.kz​/index​.php​/ru​/directions​/otdel​-kazaxskoj​-etnografii​/1428​-vnutrennee​-prostranstvo​-i​-simvolikakazaxskoj​-yurty, 13/07/2019
Bhatia, V. K.
(1993) Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Longman.Google Scholar
Dunn, C. D.
(2005) Conventions, speaker identities, and creativity: an analysis of Japanese wedding speeches. Pragmatics, 15 (2/3), 205–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fatikov, R. R.
(1980) K semantike shanyraka [To the semantics of shanyrak], In Problemy izucheniya i ohrany pamyatnikov kul’tury Kazakhstana [Problems of studying and protecting cultural monuments of Kazakhstan] (pp.179–185). Nauka KazSSR [Science of the KSSR].Google Scholar
Foucault, M.
(1977) Slova i veshchi. Arheologiya gumanitarnyh nauk [Words and things. Archeology of the Humanities]. Translation by V. P. Vizgin, N. S. Avtonomova. Progress.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H. -G.
(1988) Istina i metod. Osnovy filosofskoj germenevtiki [Truth and method. Basics of philosophical hermeneutics]. Progress.Google Scholar
Goddard, C. & A. Wierzbicka
(1997) Discourse and Culture, In Teun A. van Dijk. (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, 2nd edition, (pp.231–259). Sage.Google Scholar
Gunthner, S.
(2007) Intercultural communication and the relevance cultural specific repertoires of communicative genres, In H. Kotthoff & H. Spencer-Oatey. (Eds.), Handbook Intercultural communication, (pp.127–152). Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grodekov, N. I.
(1889) Kirgizy i karakirgizy Syr-Dar’inskoj oblasti. Yuridicheskij byt [Kyrgyz and Karakyrgyz Syr-Darya region. Legal life]. Tashkent, T. 1.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1989) Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helpiks.org
Jung, C. G.
(1991) Arhetip i simvol [Archetype and symbol]. Centr gumanitarnyh tekhnologij [Center for Humanitarian Technologies]. Retrieved from https://​gtmarket​.ru​/laboratory​/basis​/4229​/4231, 27/05/2019.
Kotthoff, H.
(1995) The social semiotics of Georgian toast performances: Oral genre as cultural activity. Journal of Pragmatics, 24(4), 353–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kenesbaev, S.
(1977) Frazeologicheskij slovar’ kazahskogo yazyka [Phraseological dictionary of the Kazakh language]. Alma-Ata.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson
(1980) Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G.
(1995) Metaphor, morality, and politics, or, why conservatives have left liberals in the dust. Social Research, 62(2), 177–213.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C.
(1979) Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17(5/6), 356–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luckmann, T.
(1986) Grundformen der gesellschaftlichen Vermittlung des Wissens: Kommunikative Gattungen [Basic forms of social mediation of knowledge: communicative genres]. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft [Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology. Special issue], 271, 191–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malinovsky, B.
(2005) Nauchnaya teoriya kul’tury [The scientific theory of culture]. OGI.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
(1985) Process and text: two aspects of human semiosis, In J. D. Benson and W. S. Greaves. (Eds), Systemic Perspectives on Discourse: Selected Theoretical Papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop (pp. 248–274). Ablex.Google Scholar
(1992) English Text: System and Structure. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & J. Rothery
(1986) What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about ‘good writing’. In B. Couture. (Eds.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 241–265). Frances Printer.Google Scholar
Miller, C. R.
(1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 701, 151–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petrovic, T.
(2006) Zdravica kod balkanskih Slovena [Toast to the Balkan Slavs]. Balkanoloski institut SANU [Balkanological Institute SANU].Google Scholar
Podosinov, A. V.
(1999) Orientaciya po stranam sveta arhaicheskih kul’tur Evrazii [Orientation by countries of the archaic cultures of Eurasia]. Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury [Languages of Slavic culture].Google Scholar
Sahin, S. S.
(2016) Communities and Cultures of Women: A Study of Neighbourhood Groups and Gated Communities in Assam. Space and Culture, India, 4(2), 45–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharifian, F.
(2011) Cultural Conceptualisations and Language: theoretical framework and applications. John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Cultural Linguistics: Cultural conceptualisations and language. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shakhanova, N. Z.
(1998) Mir tradicionnoj kul’tury kazahov [The world of traditional culture of the Kazakhs]. Almaty.Google Scholar
Sozdik.kz
Stebleva, I. V.
(1972) K rekonstrukcii drevnetyurkskoj religiozno-mifologicheskoj sistemy [To the reconstruction of the ancient Türkic religious and mythological system], In Tyurkologicheskij sbornik [Turkological collection] (pp. 213–214). Moscow.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M.
(1990) Genre Analysis in English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D.
(1993) What’s in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying Expectations, Framing in Discourse, 14–56. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tasibekov, K.
(2015) Situativnyj kazahskij: Mir kazahov [Situational Kazakh: World of Kazakhs]. Almaty.Google Scholar
Temirgazina, Z., Bakhtikireeva, U., Sinyachkin, V.
(2017) Artifacts as a source of russian and kazakh Zoological terms. Information, 20, 4(A), 2325–2336. http://​www​.information​-iii​.org​/abs​_e2​.html#No4(A)​-2017
Temirgazina, Z., Akosheva, M., Shakaman, Y., Shaharman, A., Kurmanova, Z., Kairova, M.
(2019) Metaphors in Anatomical Terminology. Space and Culture, India, 7(1), 143–153. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Temirgazina, Z., Nikolaenko, S., Akosheva, M., Luczyk, M., Khamitov, G.
(2020) “Naive anatomy” in the Kazakh language world picture in comparison with English and Russian. XLinguae, 13(2), 3–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tokhtabaeva, S. Z.
(2017) Etiketnye normy kazahov [Etiquette norms of the Kazakhs]. Almaty.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1983) Genry mowy [Speech genry]. In T. Dobrzyńska & E. Janus. (Eds.), Tekst i zdanie: Zbiór studiów [Text and sentence: Collection of studies], (pp. 125–137). PAN.Google Scholar
(1991) Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yegizbaeva, M. K.
(2018) Yurta i osobennosti mirovospriyatiya kazahov [Yurt and Kazakh worldview features]. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal «edu.e-history.kz» [Electronic scientific journal “edu.e-history.kz”], 1 (05). Retrieved from http://​edu​.e​-history​.kz​/ru​/publications​/view​/379, 09/04/2019.
Yu, N.
(2017) Life as opera: A cultural metaphor in Chinese, In F. Sharifian. (Eds.). Advances in Cultural Linguistics (pp.65–89). Springer Nature. CrossrefGoogle Scholar