Article published in:
Metaphorical creativity across modes
Edited by Laura Hidalgo-Downing and Blanca Kraljevic Mujic
[Metaphor and the Social World 3:2] 2013
► pp. 220239
References

Rereferences

Baicchi, A.
(2003) Relational complexity of titles and texts: A semiotic taxonomy. In L. Merlini Barbaresi (Ed.), Complexity in language and text (pp. 319–341). Pisa: Edizione Plus-Universidad de Pisa.Google Scholar
in press). Film and literary titles: An analysis of ‘threshold items’ in different modes of communication. In A. Baldry & E. Montagna (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on multimodality: Theory and practice . Campobasso: Palladino.
Barcelona, A.
(2000) Introduction. The cognitive theory of metaphor and metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 1–28). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2011) Reviewing the properties and prototypical structure of metonymy. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 7–57). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J.
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy. Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics , 21(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benczes, R., Barcelona, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez, F. J.
(Eds.) (2011)  Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics. Towards a consensus view . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, G., & Coulson, S.
(2010) Processing deliberate ambiguity in newspaper headlines: Double grounding. Discourse Processes , 47(3), 212–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brône, G., & Feyaerts, K.
(2005) Headlines and cartoons in the economic press: Double grounding as a discourse supportive strategy. In G. Erreygers & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Language, communication and the economy (pp. 73–99). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R.
(2009) Cutting across the senses. Imagery in winespeak and audiovisial promotion. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), (pp.72–94)..Google Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
(2000) Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics , 11(3/4), 175–196. Google Scholar
Dirven, R., & Pörings, R.
(Eds.) (2002)  Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(2002a)  The way we think . New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
(2002b) Metaphor, metonymy and binding. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 469–487). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forceville, C.
(1996)  Pictorial metaphor in advertising . London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E.
(Eds.) (2009)  Multimodal metaphor . Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A.
(2004) Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol , 19(2), 115–141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goossens, L.
(1995) Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in figurative expressions for linguistic action. In L. Goossens, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A-M. Simon-Vandenbergen, & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By word of mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective (pp. 159–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo Downing, L., & Kraljevic Mujic, B.
(2011) Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics , 9(1), 153–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koller, V.
(2004) Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and ‘pugnacious? Journal of Sociolinguists , 8(1), 3–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2009) Brand images: Multimodal metaphor in corporate branding messages. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 45–71). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2010) A new look at metaphorical creativity in cognitive linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics , 21(4), 663–697. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Niemeier, S.
(2000) Straight from the heart — metonymic and metaphorical explorations. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 195–213). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Panther, K-U.
., & Radden, G. (Eds.) (1999)  Metonymy in language and thought . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Y., & Geeraerts, D.
(2006) Metonymy as a prototypical category. Cognitive Linguistics , 17(3), 269–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Porto Requejo, M. D.
(2012) The life of the green shoots metaphor in the Spanish media. Metaphor and the Social World , 2(1), 22–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Díez Velasco, O. I.
(2002) Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, E.
(2008)  Metaphor in discourse . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I.
(1999) The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, F.
(2004) Ads as news stories, news stories as ads: The interaction of advertisements and editorial texts. Text , 24(3), 307–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Urios-Aparisi, E.
(2009) Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–117). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Veale, T.
(2012)  Exploding the creativity myth. The computational foundations of linguistic creativity . London & New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
White, M.
(2011) Cracking the code of press headlines: From difficulty to opportunity for the foreign language learner. International Journal of English Studies , 11(1), 95–116.Google Scholar
White, M., & Herrera, H.
(2009) How business press headlines get their message across: a different perspective on metaphor. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourses (pp.135–152). Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

No author info given
2017.  In Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising [Figurative Thought and Language, 2], Crossref logo
Chatti, Sami
2021. Visual metaphtonymy in automobile femvertising. Multimodal Communication 10:2  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Chatti, Sami
2021. Visual metaphtonymy in automobile femvertising. Journal of Visual Literacy  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Herrero-Ruiz, Javier
2021. Interpretations based on delayed-domain (dis)appearance in printed advertising. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2  pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2020. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1  pp. 78 ff. Crossref logo
Roldan Riejos, Ana Maria
2016.  In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.