Article published in:
Narrative Inquiry
Vol. 28:1 (2018) ► pp. 139–160

How reading narratives can improve our fitness to survive

A Mental Simulation Model

| Radboud University
Previous research has argued that narrative is an evolutionary adaptation, offering advantages in terms of survival and reproductive successes. It is yet unclear, however, how narratives may promote our fitness to survive. Integrating developments in narrative theory, evolutionary psychology, communication science, and cognitive neuroscience, this article presents a Mental Simulation Model that explains the mechanisms through which narratives prepare us for potential life-threatening events in the future. The model proposes that the design features of narrative (setting, perspective, and action) facilitate various distinctive processes of mental simulation (transportation, identification, and action simulation). It is argued that these simulation processes are capable of enhancing our fitness to survive in distinct but complementary ways. The article offers testable propositions and discusses empirical implications.
Keywords: narrative, adaptation, mental simulation, transportation, identification, action simulation
Published online: 27 September 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.17049.kri
References

References

Arora, S., Aggarwal, R., Sirimanna, P., Moran, A., Grantcharov, T., Kneebone, R., … Darzi, A.
(2011) Mental practice enhances surgical technical skills: A randomized controlled study. Annals of Surgery, 253(2), 265–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M.
(2006) Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16(18), 1818–1823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.
(1981) Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel: Notes toward a historical poetics. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 84–258). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M.
(2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barsalou, L. W.
(1999) Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 637–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, 617–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B.
(2009) On the origin of stories: Evolution, cognition, and fiction. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S.
(1986) Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, J.
(1995) Evolution and literary theory. Human Nature, 6(2), 119–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Human nature and literary meaning: A theoretical model illustrated with a critique of Pride and Prejudice. In J. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 76–106). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
(2011) Reading human nature: Literary Darwinism in theory and practice. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, P., & Shepperd, J. A.
(2009) Preparedness, mental simulations, and future outlooks. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 425–440). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Ingvar, D. H.
(1990) Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta Psychologica, 73(1), 13–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dissanayake, E.
(1995) Homo aestheticus: Where art comes from and why. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Emmott, C.
(1997) Narrative comprehension: A discourse perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 157 ]
Farner, G.
(2014) Literary fiction: The ways we read narrative literature. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. H., & Zwaan, R. A.
(2008) Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A.
(1976) The language of thought. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W.
(1988) Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28(1), 3–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, G.
(1980) Narrative discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gerardin, E., Sirigu, A., Lehéricy, S., Poline, J. -B., Gaymard, B., Marsault, C., … Le Bihan, D.
(2000) Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cerebral Cortex, 10(11), 1093–1104. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, R. J.
(1993) Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P.
(2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gottschall, J., & Wilson, D. S.
(2005) The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C., Aldao, A., Pollack, B., Rozin, P., & Small, A.
(2004) Effect of story details on transportation into narrative worlds and identification with characters. Paper presented at the IGEL conference, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology, Edmonton.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C.
(2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, M. C., & Donahue, J. K.
(2009) Simulated worlds: Transportation into narratives. In: K. Markman, W. M. Klein, & J. A. Stuhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 241–256). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F.
(2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jeannerod, M.
(2001) Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103–S109. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaschak, M. P., Zwaan, R. A., Aveyard, M., & Yaxley, R. H.
(2006) Perception of auditory motion affects language processing. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 733–744. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E.
(2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(2006) Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 37–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N., & Short, M.
(2007) Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
(1984) Stories, scripts, and scenes: Aspects of schema theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K.
(2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 158 ]
Niles, J. D.
(2010) Homo narrans: The poetics and anthropology of oral literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K.
(2016) Fiction: Simulation of Social Worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E., & Capps, L.
(1996) Narrating the self. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 19–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Omaha World-Herald
(2007, December 6). ‘Horror of massacre hits home.’ p.04A.Google Scholar
Panero, M. E., Weisberg, D. S., Black, J., Goldstein, T. R., Barnes, J. L., Brownell, H., & Winner, E.
(2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K.
(2009) Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, S.
(2002) Narrative fiction: Contemporary poetics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G.
(2005) The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5), 419–421. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samur, D., Tops, M., & Koole, S. L.
(2017) Does a single session of reading literary fiction prime enhanced mentalising performance? Four replication experiments of Kidd and Castano (2013). Cognition and Emotion, 1–15.Google Scholar
Sanford, A. J., & Emmott, C.
(2012) Mind, brain and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scalise Sugiyama, M.
(2001a) Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 221–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001b) Narrative theory and function: Why evolution matters. Philosophy and Literature, 25(2), 233–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2005) Reverse-engineering narrative: Evidence of special design. In J. Gottschall & D. S. Wilson (Eds.), The literary animal: Evolution and the nature of narrative (pp. 177–196). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L.
(2007) Remembering the past to imagine the future: The prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657–661. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P.
(1975) Scripts, Plans, and Knowledge. Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, Tblisi, Georgia.Google Scholar
Segal, E. M.
(1995) Narrative comprehension and the role of deictic shift theory. In J. F. Duchan, G. A. Bruder & L. E. Hewitt (Eds.), Deixis in narrative: A cognitive science perspective (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C.
(2007) The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(03), 299–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szpunar, K. K.
(2010) Episodic future thought an emerging concept. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The Associated Press
(2007, April 16). ‘Gunman killed 21, wounds 21 at Virginia Tech shooting before being killed’.Google Scholar
[ p. 159 ]
The Denver Post
(2012, July 21). ‘Disbelief, horror, worry and then, finally, relief.’ p.6A.Google Scholar
The New York Times
(2007, April 17) ‘Drumbeat of shots, broken by pauses to reload.’ p.1.Google Scholar
(2012, July 21). ‘Gunman kills 12 at Colorado theater; Scores are wounded, reviving debate.’ p.1.Google Scholar
The Virginian-Pilot
(2007, April 19). ‘In tech aftermath, mom, son rush desparately to connect.’ p.A1.Google Scholar
The Washington Post
(2007, April 19). ‘That was the desk I chose to die under.’ p.A01.Google Scholar
(2012, December 16). ‘Seeking calm amid the terror.’ p.A01.Google Scholar
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L.
(2001) Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction, and the arts. SubStance, 30(1), 6–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
USA Today
(2008, February 18). ‘Student, shot in head, ran back for girlfriend.’ p.3A.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W.
(1983) Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Van Krieken, K., Hoeken, H., & Sanders, J.
(2015) From reader to mediated witness: The engaging effects of journalistic crime narratives. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(3), 580–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) Evoking and measuring identification with narrative characters: A linguistic cues framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Krieken, K., Sanders, J., & Hoeken, H.
(2016) Blended viewpoints, mediated witnesses: A cognitive linguistic approach to news narratives. In B. Dancygier, W. -l. Lu & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 145–168). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, R.
(2008) Does imagery work? Effects on performance and mental skills. Journal of Imagery Research in Sport and Physical Activity, 3(1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willems, R. M., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D.
(2010) Body-specific representations of action verbs: Neural evidence from right-and left-handers. Psychological Science, 21(1), 67–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C.
(1966) Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thoughts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A.
(2007) Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition, 105(1), 229–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A.
(1999) Situation models and the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A.
(1998) Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J.
(2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11. Crossref[ p. 160 ]Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Morin, Olivier, Alberto Acerbi & Oleg Sobchuk
2019. Why people die in novels: testing the ordeal simulation hypothesis. Palgrave Communications 5:1 Crossref logo
Scrivner, Coltan, John A. Johnson, Jens Kjeldgaard-Christiansen & Mathias Clasen
2021. Pandemic practice: Horror fans and morbidly curious individuals are more psychologically resilient during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences 168 ► pp. 110397 ff. Crossref logo
Wimmer, Lena, Stacie Friend, Gregory Currie & Heather J. Ferguson
2021. Reading Fictional Narratives to Improve Social and Moral Cognition: The Influence of Narrative Perspective, Transportation, and Identification. Frontiers in Communication 5 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.