In the last few decades, the analytical scope of narrative studies has widened from a sole focus on “prototypical”
narratives of personal experience to a wide variety of narrative genres. However interesting this may be, there are also some
problems with these genres as there is not only sometimes considerable overlap between different genres, but
there are also differences within these genres. Furthermore, real-life stories often consist of a mix of various
genres, which makes applying genre-labels to these narratives problematic. Hence, instead of making such genre classifications, I
propose an abstract “Narrative Dimensions Model” to tease out the relevant characteristics of and differences between various
types of narratives. This model consists of two three-dimensional clusters, viz., one revolving around the narrator and containing
the dimensions of ownership, authorship and tellership, and one revolving around the narrated events, containing the dimensions of
frequency, time and evaluation. I illustrate this by a theoretical exploration of various narrative genres and I conclude by
sketching the advantages of conceptualizing and scrutinizing narratives by means of this model.
Bakhtin, M. (1986). The
Problem of Speech Genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech
Genres and Other Late
Essays (pp. 60–102). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baynham, M. (2006). Performing
self, narrative and community in Moroccan narratives of migration and
settlement. In A. De Fina, D. Schiffrin & M. Bamberg (Eds.), Discourse
and
Identity (pp. 376–397). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briggs, C., & Bauman, R. (1992). Genre,
intertextuality, and social power. Journal of Linguistic
Anthropology, 2(2), 131–172.
Carranza, I. E. (2015). Narrating
and Arguing; From Plausibility to Local Moves. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The
Handbook of Narrative
Analysis (pp. 57–75). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing
about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations. Journal of
Pragmatics, 33(12), 1881–1900.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2002). Narrative
and identity management: discourse and social identities in a tale of tomorrow. Research on
Language and Social
Interaction, 35(4), 427–451.
Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25(1/2), 1–29.
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes
on story structure and organization of participation. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures
of social action: Studies in conversation
analysis (pp. 225–246). London/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hanks, W. F. (1987). Discourse
Genres in a Theory of Practice. American
Ethnologist, 14(4), 668–692.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre
in Three Traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL
quarterly, 30(4), 693–722.
Hyvärinen, M. (2015). Analyzing
narrative genres. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The
Handbook of Narrative
Analysis (pp. 178–193). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Hyvärinen, M., Hydén, L.-C., Saarenheimon, M., & Tamboukoun, M. (2010). Beyond
narrative coherence: An introduction. In M. Hyvärinen, L.-C. Hydén, M. Saarenheimon & M. Tamboukoun (Eds.), Beyond
narrative
coherence (pp. 1–15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnstone, B. (2001). Discourse
analysis and Narrative. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The
handbook of discourse
analysis (pp. 635–649). Malden: Blackwell.
Kitagawa, C., & Lehrer, A. (1990). Impersonal
uses of personal pronouns. Journal of
Pragmatics, 14(5), 739–759.
Labov, W. (1982). Speech
Actions and Reactions in Personal Narrative. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing
Discourse: Text and
Talk (pp. 219–247). Georgetown University Press: Washington DC.
Labov, W. (2011). Narratives
of Personal Experience. In P. Hogan (Ed.), Cambridge
Encyclopedia of the Language
Sciences (pp. 546–548). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1966). Narrative
Analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays
on the Verbal and Visual
Arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: Universiy of Washington Press.
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted
storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative
Sociology, 15(3), 247–271.
Linde, C. (1993). Life
Stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Mandelbaum, J. (1987). Couples
sharing stories. Communication
Quarterly, 35(2), 144–170.
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre
Relations: Mapping
culture. London: Equinox.
Minami, M., & McCabe, A. (1995). Rice
balls and bear hunts: Japanese and North American family narrative patterns. Journal of Child
Language, 22(2), 423–445.
Minister, K. (1991). A
Feminist Frame for the Oral History Interview. In S. Berger Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s
Words: the feminist practice of oral
history (pp. 27–42). New York: Routledge.
Norrick, N. R. (2007). Conversational
storytelling. In D. Herman (Ed.), The
Cambridge Companion to
Narrative (pp. 127–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norrick, N. R. (2013a). Narratives
of vicarious experience in conversation. Language in
Society, 42(4), 385–406.
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental
Psycholinguistics: Three Ways of Looking at a Child’s Narrative. New York: Plenum.
Prince, G. (1982). Narratology.
The form and functioning of narrative. Berlin: Mouton Publishers.
Prince, G. (1992). Narrative
as theme. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative
analysis. London: Sage.
Sacks, H. (1986). On
the analyzability of stories by children. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions
in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of
communication (pp. 325–345). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures
on Conversation (2 vols, edited by Gail Jefferson with introduction by Emanuel A.
Schegloff). Oxford, UK/Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
Shuman, A. (2005). Other
People’s Stories: Entitlement Claims and the Critique of Empathy. Urbana Il.: University of Illinois Press.
Shuman, A. (2015). Story
ownership and entitlement. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The
Handbook of Narrative
Analysis (pp. 38–56). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
Stirling, L., & Manderson, L. (2011). About
you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of
Pragmatics, 43(6), 1581–1602.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre
Analysis: English in Academic and Research
Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toolan, M. J. (2001). Narrative:
A Critical Linguistic Introduction (2nd
ed.). London: Routledge.
Van De Mieroop, D. (2011). Identity
negotiations in narrative accounts about poverty. Discourse &
Society, 22(5), 565–591.
Van De Mieroop, D. (2015). Social
Identity Theory and the Discursive Analysis of Collective Identities in
Narratives. In A. De Fina & A. Georgakopoulou (Eds.), The
Handbook of Narrative
Analysis (pp. 408–428). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Van De Mieroop, D. (2019). Implying
identities through narratives of vicarious experience in job interviews. Journal of
Pragmatics, 1521, 61–75.
Van De Mieroop, D. (forthcoming). Applying
the Narrative Dimensions Model. VAKKI Publications 11, Workplace Communication
III. Available at: [URL]
Van De Mieroop, D., & Clifton, J. (2016). Life
Stories. In J.-O. Östman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook
of
Pragmatics (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Van De Mieroop, D., Miglbauer, M., & Chatterjee, A. (2017). Mobilizing
master narratives through categorical narratives and categorical statements when default identities are at
stake. Discourse &
Communication, 11(2), 179–198.
Vindrola-Padros, C., & Johnson, G. A. (2014). The
Narrated, Nonnarrated, and the Disnarrated: Conceptual Tools for Analyzing Narratives in Health Services
Research. Qualitative Health
Research, 24(11), 1603–1611.
2023. Othering the expat majority: Qatari junior academics’ identity work at the interface of migration and institutional reform. Language and Intercultural Communication 23:2 ► pp. 167 ff.
Al-Khulaifi, Afra & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2024. “Why not the thoub and the abaya?” An interactional sociolinguistic approach to the interplay between nationality, gender, and professional identity in the Qatari academic workplace. Journal of Arabic Sociolinguistics 2:1 ► pp. 94 ff.
Bergroth, Mari, Júlia Llompart-Esbert, Nathalie Pepiot, Sven Sierens, Tjaša Dražnik & Karin Van Der Worp
2023. Whose action research is it?: Promoting linguistically sensitive teacher education in Europe. Educational Action Research 31:2 ► pp. 265 ff.
2022. “We went in favor of rebellion”: The decisions that made India’s Annual Status of Education Report (ASER). International Journal of Educational Development 94 ► pp. 102656 ff.
Grove, Nicola
2022. Exploring Narrative Competence of Persons with Severe Intellectual Disabilities: Insights from Complementary Inclusive Analytic Frameworks. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 24:1 ► pp. 224 ff.
2021. Insights on Narrative Analysis from a Study of Racial Microaggressions and Microaffirmations. American Journal of Qualitative Research 6:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Schoofs, Kim & Dorien Van De Mieroop
2021. Epistemic competitions over Jewish Holocaust survivors’ stories in interviews. Discourse & Society 32:6 ► pp. 728 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.