Part of
Metonymy and Pragmatic InferencingEdited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 127–147
Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Linda L. Thornburg
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113] 2003
► pp. 127–147
Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas
The case of dependent clauses as independent speech acts
Cited by (24)
Cited by 24 other publications
Tóth, Máté
DESAGULIER, GUILLAUME & PHILIPPE MONNERET
2023. Cognitive Linguistics and a Usage‐Based Approach to the Study of Semantics and Pragmatics. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 31 ff. 
Zhou, Siruo, Dan Xiong, Tongquan Zhou & Ping Pang
2023. On the Novel Chinese Modifier-Head Construction
Shejian Shang de X
: An Analysis of Meaning Construction. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 46:3 ► pp. 438 ff.
Brdar, Mario, Rita Brdar-Szabó & Tanja Gradečak
Kaltenböck, Gunther & Evelien Keizer
2022. Insubordinateif-clauses in FDG: Degrees of independence. Open Linguistics 8:1 ► pp. 675 ff.
TAKIMOTO, MASAHIRO
2021. A comparative study of animation versus static effects in the spatial concept-based metaphor awareness-raising approach on EFL learners’ cognitive processing of request strategies. Language and Cognition 13:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Matusz, Łukasz
2020. I will see it done: Metonymic extensions of the verb see in English. Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies :31(4) ► pp. 88 ff.
Bierwiaczonek, Bogusław
2018. Chapter 7. How metonymy motivates constructions. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 185 ff.
Ivanová, Martina
2018. Pragmatický Marker Fair Enough A Jeho Prekladové Ekvivalenty V AnglickoSlovenskom Paralelnom Korpuse. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 69:3 ► pp. 395 ff.
D'Hertefelt, Sarah
2017. Directive conditional and complement insubordination in Germanic languages. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2017. Chapter 1. Exploitingwh-questions for expressive purposes. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 18 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2018. Chapter 5. What kind of reasoning mode is metonymy?. In Conceptual Metonymy [Human Cognitive Processing, 60], ► pp. 121 ff.
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Linda L. Thornburg
2019. Chapter 7. Figurative reasoning in hedged performatives. In Metaphor and Metonymy in the Digital Age [Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication, 8], ► pp. 175 ff.
Rasulic, Katarina
2017. Chapter 8. Shakespeare on the shelf, Blue Helmets on the move. In Studies in Figurative Thought and Language [Human Cognitive Processing, 56], ► pp. 200 ff.
Rasulić, Katarina
2020. Chapter 4. Turning the heart into a neighbour. In The Language of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 87], ► pp. 111 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Simone Heinold
2017. Imperatives and directive strategies from a functional-typological perspective. In Imperatives and Directive Strategies [Studies in Language Companion Series, 184],
Ding, Fangfang
2015. Rethinking the Cognitive Study of Metonymy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 5:9 ► pp. 1836 ff.
Pérez Hernández, Lorena
2013. Illocutionary constructions: (multiple source)-in-target metonymies, illocutionary ICMs, and specification links. Language & Communication 33:2 ► pp. 128 ff.
Del Campo Martínez, Nuria
2011. A LEXICAL CONSTRUCTIONAL APPROACH TO ILLOCUTIONARY CONSTRUCTIONS: THE CASE OF REQUESTS. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 0:6
Baicchi, Annalisa
2007. Review of Günter, Köpcke, Berg & Siemund (2007): Aspects of Meaning Construction. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5 ► pp. 307 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa
2009. Review of Ruiz de Mendoza Ibañez & Peña Cervel (2005): Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Functions of Language 16:1 ► pp. 149 ff.
Baicchi, Annalisa
2015. Conceptual metaphor in the complex dynamics of illocutionary meaning. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 106 ff.
KONNO, HIROAKI
2004. THE IF YOU BE CONSTRUCTION AS A SPEECH ACT CONSTRUCTION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 21:1 ► pp. 34 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.