Article published in:
Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and descriptionEdited by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie and Paola Pietrandrea
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234] 2013
► pp. 19–46
“Same same but different” – Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization
Gabriele Diewald | Leibniz Universität Hannover
The term “Discourse Marker” (DM) tends to be defined via onomasiological – functional and universal – criteria, while the term “Modal Particle” (MP) usually refers to a semasiologically defined language-specific word class. Thus, both terms belong to different layers of linguistic description and may not be juxtaposed in direct comparison. Starting from this problem in current efforts of classification and using data from German, the paper proposes a definition of these terms which takes into account their different status. It is suggested that the broad functional domain of DM be set off against and contrasted with a newly established sister domain called “Text-Connective Marker” (= TCM), while the term MP be reserved for a language-specific word class with clearly specifiable formal and functional features.
Published online: 14 November 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.234.02die
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.234.02die
Cited by
Cited by 17 other publications
No author info given
Aquino, Marceli Cherchiglia
Diewald, Gabriele
Fedriani, Chiara & Andrea Sansó
Ghomeshi, Jila
Giacalone Ramat, Anna, Caterina Mauri & Andrea Sansó
Ivanov, Vladimir Dmitrievich
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Mitsuko Narita Izutsu
Kresić, Marijana, Mia Batinić Angster & Gabriele Diewald
Lansari, Laure
Rozumko, Agata
Weerning, Marion
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.