Constructing Collectivity

'We' across languages and contexts

Editor
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027256447 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027270849 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
 
This is the first edited volume dedicated specifically to first person non-singular reference (‘we’). Its aim is to explore the interplay between the grammatical means that a language offers for accomplishing collective self-reference and the socio-pragmatic – broadly speaking – functions of ‘we’. Besides an introduction, which offers an overview of the problems and issues associated with first person non-singular reference, the volume comprises fifteen chapters that cover languages as diverse as, e.g., Dutch, Greek, Hebrew, Cha’palaa and Norf’k, and various interactional and genre-specific contexts of spoken and written discourse. It, thus, effectively demonstrates the complexity of collective self-reference and the diversity of phenomena that become relevant when ‘we’ is not examined in isolation but within the context of situated language use. The book will be of particular interest to researchers working on person deixis and reference, personal pronouns, collective identities, etc., but will also appeal to linguists whose work lies at the interface between grammar and pragmatics, sociolinguistics, discourse and conversation analysis.
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239]  2014.  x, 355 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
“The most important contribution of this book is that it provides us with different lenses or approaches for examining the use of ‘we’ in terms of personal pronouns, person deixis, collective identities, and category-bound activities within the context of situated language use. Many related issues or future research directions are proposed in the final section of each chapter, which can be a good guide to scholars and graduate students who are interested in the study of the interface between grammar and pragmatics. The most interesting part of this volume is that the use of ‘we’ in various interactional and genre-specific contexts in different languages has many versatile functions, which provides us insight into the nature of the phenomenon of constructing collectivity with ‘we’.”
Cited by

Cited by 18 other publications

No author info given
2014. Publications Received. Language in Society 43:4  pp. 485 ff. Crossref logo
No author info given
2021.  In The Politics of Person Reference [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 320], Crossref logo
Anderson, Ashley A.
2021. Expressions of Resilience: Social Media Responses to a Flooding Event. Risk Analysis 41:9  pp. 1600 ff. Crossref logo
Bazzanella, Carla
2015.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Billig, Michael
2019.  In More Examples, Less Theory, Crossref logo
Fried, Mirjam
2021. Discourse-referential patterns as a network of grammatical constructions. Constructions and Frames 13:1  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Han, Yanmei & Tao Xiong
2022. Using wǒmen (we) to mean s/he in Chinese parents’ interaction. Pragmatics and Society 13:1  pp. 126 ff. Crossref logo
Kleinke, Sonja, Nuria Hernández & Birte Bös
2018.  In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Koven, Michele & Isabelle Simões Marques
2021. Multiaddressivity and Collective Addressivity in Vlog‐based Interactions between Diasporic and Nonmigrant Portuguese. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31:1  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Laurens, Stéphane & Mickael Ballot
2021. “We must continue.” The strange appearance of “we” instead of “you” in the prods of the Milgram experiment. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology 5:4  pp. 556 ff. Crossref logo
Marcus, Imogen & Mel Evans
2019.  In Reference and Identity in Public Discourses [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 306],  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo
Mostafiz, Rubayet Bin, Robert V. Rohli, Carol J. Friedland & Yong-Cheol Lee
2022. Actionable Information in Flood Risk Communications and the Potential for New Web-Based Tools for Long-Term Planning for Individuals and Community. Frontiers in Earth Science 10 Crossref logo
Mühlhäusler, Peter
2019.  In The Second Cognitive Revolution [Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences, ],  pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2017. “We are going to our Portuguese homeland!”. Narrative Inquiry 27:2  pp. 286 ff. Crossref logo
Simões Marques, Isabelle & Michèle Koven
2019.  In Storytelling in the Digital World [Benjamins Current Topics, 104],  pp. 79 ff. Crossref logo
Smith, Joel
2018. The First-Person Plural and Immunity to Error. Disputatio 10:49  pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Uzum, Baburhan, Bedrettin Yazan & Ali Fuad Selvi
2018. Inclusive and exclusive uses of we in four American textbooks for multicultural teacher education. Language Teaching Research 22:5  pp. 625 ff. Crossref logo
Wei, Jennifer M. & Ren-feng Duann
2019. Who are we?. Journal of Language and Politics 18:5  pp. 760 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
ONIX Metadata
ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2013041461 | Marc record