Speech acts are functional entities and can, therefore, not be searched for directly in large computerised corpora. They can only be located on the basis of specific patterns that are known to be typical for a particular speech act, e.g. with IFIDs like “(I’m) sorry”. In this contribution we propose an alternative way called metacommunicative expression analysis. In this approach we do not search for a particular speech act but via expressions referring to this speech act we search for passages in which a speaker talks about it. As a case study we look at compliments in four samples of the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) comprising texts from 1810 to 2010 and in an additional sample in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). 1741 passages containing the word “compliment” were retrieved across the two centuries and analysed manually on the basis of the information given in the context. The results suggest that a distinction must be made between ceremonious compliments and personal compliments and that – contrary to claims in the relevant literature – men are more often described as paying and receiving compliments than women.
= The British National Corpus (version 3, BNC XML Edition) 2007Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. Online: [URL]
.
COCA
= Corpus of Contemporary American English (2011 version) 2008–2011 Compiled by Mark Davies. Online: [URL]
.
COHA
= Corpus of Historical American English (2011 version) 2010–2011 Compiled by Mark Davies. Online: [URL]
.
EEBO
= Early English Books Online2003–2012 ProQuest LLC. Online: [URL]
.
LION
= Literature Online1996–2012 ProQuest LLC. Online: [URL]
.
Secondary sources
Chen, Rong
1993“Responding to Compliments: A Contrastive Study of Politeness Strategies between American English and Chinese Speakers.”Journal of Pragmatics 20 (1): 49–75.
Chen, Rong, and Dafu Yang
2010“Responding to Compliments in Chinese: Has It Changed?”Journal of Pragmatics 42 (7): 1951–1963.
Cheng, Dongmei
2011“New Insights on Compliment Responses: A Comparison between Native English Speakers and Chinese L2 Speakers.”Journal of Pragmatics 43 (8): 2204–2214 DOI:
Deutschmann, Mats
2003Apologising in British English. (Skrifter från moderna språk 10.) Umeå: Institutionen för moderna språk, Umeå University.
1988“Paying Compliments: A Sex-preferential Politeness Strategy.”Journal of Pragmatics 12 (4): 445–465.
Holmes, Janet
1990“Politeness Strategies in New Zealand Women’s Speech.” In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, ed. by Allan Bell, and Janet Homes, 252–276. Clevedon/Bristol, PA: Multilingual Matters.
Holmes, Janet
1995Women, Men and Politeness. London: Longman.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2009“Speech Act Research between Armchair, Field and Laboratory: The Case of Compliments.”Journal of Pragmatics 41 (8): 1611–1635 DOI:
Jucker, Andreas H., Gerold Schneider, Irma Taavitsainen, and Barb Breustedt
1983Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Manes, Joan, and Nessa Wolfson
1981“The Compliment Formula.” In Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 115–132. The Hague: Mouton.
OED
= Oxford English Dictionary, 3rd edition in progress 1989– Oxford University Press. Online: [URL]
.
Schneider, Klaus P.
2012“Appropriate Behaviour across Varieties of English.”Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1022–1037 DOI:
Schneider, Klaus P., and Iris Schneider
2000“Bescheidenheit in vier Kulturen: Komplimenterwiderungen in den USA, Irland, Deutschland und China.” In Ethische Konzepte und mentale Kulturen 2: Sprachwissenschaftliche Studien zu Höflichkeit und Respektverhalten (Vaasan yliopiston julkaisuja: Tutkimuksia 237, Kielitiede 39), ed. by Mariann Skog-Södersved, 65–80. Vaasa: Vaasan yliopisto.
Searle, John R.
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009“A Contrastive Study of Compliment Responses among Australian English and Mandarin Chinese Speakers.”Journal of Pragmatics 41 (2): 325–345.
Yuan, Yi
2001“An Inquiry into Empirical Pragmatics Data-gathering Methods: Written DCTs, Oral DCTs, Field Notes, and Natural Conversations.”Journal of Pragmatics 33 (2): 271–292.
Cited by
Cited by 15 other publications
Al-Khawaldeh, Sami Khalaf, Marwan Jarrah & Sharif Alghazo
2023. Evil-eye expressive strategies between utterers and interpreters: A pragmatic study on Colloquial Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 204 ► pp. 6 ff.
Han, Jing & Chengtuan Li
2023. Book review. Journal of Pragmatics 216 ► pp. 43 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2017. Speech Acts and Speech Act Sequences: Greetings and Farewells in the History of American English. Studia Neophilologica 89:sup1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2018. Apologies in the History of English: Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English (COHA). Corpus Pragmatics 2:4 ► pp. 375 ff.
Jucker, Andreas H.
2018. Historische Pragmatik. In Handbuch Pragmatik, ► pp. 132 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.