Part of
Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives
Edited by Juana I. Marín-Arrese, Gerda Haßler and Marta Carretero
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 271] 2017
► pp. 297313
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2003 “Evidentiality in Typological Perspective.” In Studies in Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, and Robert M. W. Dixon, 1–31. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986 “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006a “Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text-driven Approach.” Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006bEvaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect and Modality in Languages of the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Mark
2007TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s. [URL]
. 2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present. [URL]
2010The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009. [URL]
2011Google Books Corpus. [URL]
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott
2003Grammaticalization, (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2000 “Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse.” In Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by Susan Hunston, and Geoff Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan, and Gill Francis
1998 “Verbs Observed: A Corpus Driven Pedagogic Grammar.” Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 45–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: LINCOM.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk, and Johan van der Auwera
2009 “Revisiting Be Supposed To from a Diachronic Constructionalist Perspective.” English Studies 90: 599–623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1995 “Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth, and Bernd Heine
1991Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir Plungian
1998 “Modality’s Semantic Map.” Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Linxiu
2013 “Evaluative Functions of Reporting Evidentials in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics.” Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3 (2): 119–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegeler, Debra
2008 “Propositional Aspect and the Development of Modal Inferences in English.” In Modality-Aspect Interfaces: Implications and Typological Solutions, ed. by Werner Abraham, and Elisabeth Leiss, 43–79. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2022. Epistemological stance and passive reporting verbs in judicial opinions: the case of BE expected to and BE supposed to . Text & Talk 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.