Chapter 12
Exploring evidential uses of the passive of reporting verbs through corpus analysis
One feature which has interesting evidential implications in English is the passive form of verbs of saying or thinking. Corpus evidence is used to trace the evolution of the most frequent passive structures of this kind over the last two hundred years, and to explore changes in their use. Diachronic developments in frequency, and evidence for semantic and syntactic narrowing of the passive forms of “say”, “expect” and “suppose”, are analysed in the light of claims that these forms are becoming grammaticalised. Trends concerning the deontic and evidential uses of “expect” and “suppose” are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Corpus and method
- 3.Patterns of frequency today
-
4.Diachronic developments
- 4.1Patterns of frequency over time
- 4.2Changing trends in use
- 4.2.1“BE said to”
-
4.2.2“BE expected to”
- 4.2.3“BE supposed to”
-
5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2004 Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, Lloyd B.
1986 “
Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In
Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by
Wallace Chafe, and
Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood: Ablex.

Bednarek, Monika
2006a “
Epistemological Positioning and Evidentiality in English News Discourse: A Text-driven Approach.”
Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660.


Bednarek, Monika
2006b Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus. London: Continuum.

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994 The Evolution of Grammar, Tense, Aspect and Modality in Languages of the World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Davies, Mark
2007 TIME Magazine Corpus: 100 million words, 1920s-2000s.
[URL]
Davies, Mark
.
2008 The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 520 million words, 1990-present.
[URL]
Davies, Mark
2010 The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810-2009.
[URL]
Davies, Mark
2011 Google Books Corpus.
[URL]
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization, (2nd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Hunston, Susan
2000 “
Evaluation and the Planes of Discourse.” In
Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, ed. by
Susan Hunston, and
Geoff Thompson, 176–207. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunston, Susan, and Gill Francis
1998 “
Verbs Observed: A Corpus Driven Pedagogic Grammar.”
Applied Linguistics 19 (1): 45–72.


Lehmann, Christian
1995 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. München: LINCOM.

Noël, Dirk, and Johan van der Auwera
2009 “
Revisiting Be Supposed To from a Diachronic Constructionalist Perspective.”
English Studies 90: 599–623.


Traugott, Elizabeth
1995 “
Subjectification in Grammaticalization.” In
Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, ed. by
Dieter Stein, and
Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Traugott, Elizabeth, and Bernd Heine
1991 Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

van der Auwera, Johan and Vladimir Plungian
1998 “
Modality’s Semantic Map.”
Linguistic Typology 2: 79–124.


Yang, Linxiu
2013 “
Evaluative Functions of Reporting Evidentials in English Research Articles of Applied Linguistics.”
Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3 (2): 119–126.


Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2022.
Epistemological stance and passive reporting verbs in judicial opinions: the case of BE expected to and BE supposed to
.
Text & Talk 0:0

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.