This chapter investigates ways in which multiple participants coordinate actions within a temporally unfolding “turn-constructional unit (TCU)” in Japanese conversation. Utterances are shaped by ongoing processes of participation and speakers modulate the structure of their emerging TCU with recipients’ dynamic stance-displays. Building on Iwasaki (2011, 2013), the paper examines ways in which speakers delay the further realization of an unfolding unit by suspending its progressivity, and incorporate recipients’ actions into the design of the turn. The speaker creates interstitial spaces right after or immediately before producing a component conveying speaker’s stance and affiliation, and invites recipient’s actions toward the particular component before completing the turn. This chapter illustrates systematic multimodal practices within unit construction that enable emergent forms of participation.
Chevalier, Fabienne H. G. and Rebecca Clift. 2008. “Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: Projectability, Syntax and Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 40: 1731–1752.
Clancy, Patricia M.1982. “Written and Spoken Style in Japanese Narratives.” In Spoken and Written Language, ed. by Tannen, Deborah, 55–76. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Clancy, Patricia M., Thompson, Sandra A., Suzuki, Ryoko, and Hongyin Tao. 1996. “The Conversational Use of Reactive Tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics 26: 355–387.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. “Multimodal Interaction from a Conversation Analytic Perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 1–8.
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner. 2015. “Temporality in Interaction.” In Temporality in Interaction, ed by Deppermann, Arnulf, and Susanne Günthner, 1–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Du Bois, John. W., and Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. “Taking a Stance on Emotion: Affect, Sequence, and Intersubjectivity in Dialogic Interaction.” Text and Talk 32 (4): 433–451.
Englebretson, Robert (ed). 2007. Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fox, Barbara A, Hayashi, Makoto, and Robert Jasperson. 1996. “Resources and Repair: A Cross-Linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Sandra A. Thompson, 185–237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by Psathas, George, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers, Inc.
Goodwin, Charles. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse and Society 18 (1): 53–73.
Goodwin, Charles. 2013. “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 8–23.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 1992. “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, and Charles Goodwin, 147–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin. 2004. “Participation.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. 1980. “Process of Mutual Monitoring Implicated in the Production of Description.” Sociological Inquiry 50: 303–317.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, and Charles Goodwin. 2001. “Emotion within Situated Activity.” In Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. by Duranti, Alessandro, 239–257. Malden, MA: Blackwell. (Originally published in Budwig, Nancy, Uzgiris, Ina C., and James V. Wertsch (2000): Communication: An Arena of Development, ed.by Stamford, CT: Ablex.)
Hayano, Kaoru. 2013. Territories of Knowledge in Japanese Conversation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2003. Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2004. “Discourse within a Sentence: An Exploration of Postpositions in Japanese as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society 33: 343–376.
Hayashi, Makoto. 2005. “Joint Turn Construction through Language and the Body: Notes on Embodiment in Coordinated Participation in Situated Activities.” Semiotica 156 (1/4): 21–53
Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45: 1–29.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2005. “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38.
Iwasaki, Shimako. 2011. “The Multimodal Mechanics of Collaborative Unit Construction in Japanese Conversation.” In Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, ed. by Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and Curtis LeBaron, 106–120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iwasaki, Shimako. 2013. “Emerging Units and Emergent Forms of Participation within a Unit in Japanese Interaction: Local Organization at a Finer Level of Granularity.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, ed. by Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice, and Geoffrey Raymond, 243–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Iwasaki, Shoichi. 1993. “The Structure of the Intonation Unit in Japanese.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 3, ed. by Choi, Soonja, 39–53. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Koshik, Irene. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309.
Lerner, Gene. 1996. “On the “Semi-Permeable” Character of Grammatical Units in Conversation: Conditional Entry into the Turn Space of Another Speaker.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Sandra A. Thompson, 238–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lerner, Gene. 2002. “Turn-Sharing: The Choral Co-Production of Talk-in-Interaction.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, ed.by Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson, 225–256. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lerner, Gene. 2013. “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey, and Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Makino, Seiichi and Michio Tsutsui. 1986. A Dictionary of Basic Japanese Grammar. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
Masuoka, Takashi. 1991. Modaritii no bunpoo [Grammar of Modality]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.
Maynard, Douglas W.1989. “Perspective-Display Sequences in Conversation.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 53: 91–113.
Maynard, Senko K.1989. Japanese Conversation: Self-Conceptualization through Structure and Interactional Management. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Maynard, Senko K.1990. An Introduction to Japanese Grammar and Communication Strategies. Tokyo: The Japan Times.
Maynard, Senko K.1992. “Cognitive and Pragmatic Messages of a Syntactic Choice: The Case of the Japanese Commentary Predicate n(o) da.” TEXT 12 (4): 563–613.
Mori, Junko and Kanae Nakamura. 2008. “Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: An Analysis of Designedly Ambiguous.” In Japanese Applied Linguistics: Discourse and Social Perspectives, ed. by Mori, Junko, and Amy S. Ohta, 52–79. London: Continuum.
Morita, Emi. 2005. Negotiation of Contingent Talk: The Japanese Interactional Particles ne and sa. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Park, Jae-Eun. 2009. Turn-Taking Organization for Korean Conversation: With a Conversation Analytic Proposal for the Research and Teaching of Korean Learners of English. Los Angeles, CA: Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCLA.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features Found in Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Atkinson, J. Maxwell, and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1988. “Offering a Candidate Answer: An Information Seeking Strategy.” Communication Monographs 55 (December): 360–373.
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Button, Graham and J. R. E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, ed. by Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.2006. “Interaction: The Infrastructure for Social Institutions, the Natural Ecological Niche for Language, and the Arena in which Culture is Enacted.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition, and Human Interaction, ed. by Enfield, Nicholas J., and Stephen C. Levinson, 70–96. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 8: 289–327.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1990. The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya. 2008. “Stance, Alignment and Affiliation during Story Telling: Nodding as a Token of Preliminary Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell (eds). 2005. “Multi-Modal Interaction.” Semiotica 156 (1/4): 1–20.
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano. 2012. “Mobilizing Response in Interaction: A Compositional View of Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by de Ruiter, Jan P., 58–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, Jürgen, Goodwin, Charles, and Curtis LeBaron (eds). 2011. Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Svennenig, Jan. 2015. “Presenting Complex Information in Installments.” Paper presented at Revising Participation: Language and Bodies in Interaction, 24–27 June 2015, University of Basel, Switzerland. [URL].
Tanaka, Hiroko. 1999. Turn-Taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study of Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Tanaka, Hiroko. 2000. “The Particles ne as a Turn-Management Device in Japanese Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1135–1176.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Simone, Monica & Renata Galatolo
2023. The situated deployment of the Italian presentative (e) hai. . ., ‘(and) you have. . .’ within routinized multimodal Gestalts in route mapping with visually impaired climbers. Discourse Studies 25:1 ► pp. 89 ff.
NAKAGAWA, Atsushi
2022. Conversation Analysis of Calls in Long-distance Caregiving. Japanese Sociological Review 73:2 ► pp. 136 ff.
Oloff, Florence
2022. The Particle Jako (“Like”) in Spoken Czech: From Expressing Comparison to Mobilizing Affiliative Responses. Frontiers in Psychology 12
2021. Conversation and Culture. Annual Review of Anthropology 50:1 ► pp. 219 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.