Chapter published in:Time in Embodied Interaction: Synchronicity and sequentiality of multimodal resources
Edited by Arnulf Deppermann and Jürgen Streeck
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 293] 2018
► pp. 123–160
Revisiting delayed completions
The retrospective management of co-participant action
Since Lerner coined the notion of delayed completion in 1989, this recurrent social practice of continuing one’s speaking turn while disregarding an intermediate co-participant’s utterance has not been investigated with regard to embodied displays and actions. A sequential approach to videotaped mundane conversations in German will explain the occurrence and use of delayed completions. First, especially in multi-party and multi-activity settings, delayed completions can result from reduced monitoring and coordinating activities. Second, recipients can use intra-turn response slots for more extended responsive actions than the current speaker initially projected, leading to delayed completion sequences. Finally, delayed completions are used for blocking possibly misaligned co-participant actions. The investigation of visible action illustrates that delayed completions are a basic practice for retrospectively managing co-participant response slots.
Keywords: conversation analysis, video data, turn-taking, delayed completion, multi-activity and multi-party settings
Published online: 13 September 2018
Deppermann, Arnulf, and Reinhold Schmitt
Egbert, Maria M.
Ford, Cecilia E., Fox, Barbara A., and Sandra A. Thompson
Ford, Cecilia E, Thompson, Sandra A., and Veronika Drake
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie H. Goodwin
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
Haddington, Pentti, Keisanen, Tiina, Mondada, Lorenza, and Maurice Nevile
Hazel, Spencer, Mortensen, Kristian, and Gitte Rasmussen
Keisanen, Tiina, Rauniomaa, Mirka, and Pentti Haddington
Lerner, Gene H.
Licoppe, Christian, and Sylvaine Tuncer
Local, John, and Gareth Walker
Manrique, Elizabeth, and Nick J. Enfield
2014a “Conventions for Multimodal Transcription.” Basel: Universität. Accessed November 13, 2017. https://franzoesistik.philhist.unibas.ch/fileadmin/user_upload/franzoesistik/mondada_multimodal_conventions.pdf
2008 “La complétude négociée des unités de construction de tour: les complétions différées comme ressource en français parlé.” In Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française (CMLF’08), ed. by Durand, Jacques, Habert, Benoît, and Bernard Laks, 773–788. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Française. Accessed November 13, 2017. http://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org/articles/cmlf/abs/2008/01/cmlf08243/cmlf08243.html
2009 Contribution à l’étude systématique de l’organisation des tours de parole: Les chevauchements en français et en allemand. Mannheim: Universität Mannheim. Accessed November 13, 2017. https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/29617/.
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1995 “Parties and Talking Together: Two Ways in which Numbers Are Significant for Talk-in-Interaction.” In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Have, Paul T., and George Psathas, 31–42. Washington: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.
Seo, Mi-Suk, and Irene Koshik
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
Thompson, Sandra A., Fox, Barbara A., and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
2003 “Turn Continuations: Towards a Cross-Linguistic Classification.” InLiSt – Interaction and Linguistic Structures, 39: 1–25. Accessed November 13, 2017. http://d-nb.info/1079847162/34.