Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatics and its Interfaces
Edited by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 294] 2018
► pp. 213–239

Integrative pragmatics and (im)politeness theory

| The University of Queensland, Australia
| Lancaster University, U.K.

In this chapter, we first discuss the role that pragmatics has played in the development of (im)politeness theory, and the recent move towards a middle ground that integrates classic and discursive approaches to (im)politeness. We outline the key tenets of integrative pragmatics that afford such a move, before illustrating how these can be implemented through a case study focusing on an incident in Big Brother UK where the (ostensibly) jocular use of a racial slur by a contestant caused offence and the subsequent removal of that contestant from the show. Our analyses draw from multiple methods, including those of interactional pragmatics and corpus pragmatics. In this way, we aim to both highlight the fundamentally pragmatic basis of (im)politeness, as well as the need for a nuanced and complex theorisation that integrates multiple perspectives and methods of analysis.

Keywords: corpus pragmatics, discursive, impoliteness, integrative pragmatics, interactional pragmatics, jocular abuse, offence, politeness, pragmatics, racist discourse
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The role of pragmatics in politeness theory
  • 3.Integrative pragmatics
  • 4.Case study: Jocular abuse and offence
    • 4.1User and observer perspectives on the use of the n-word
    • 4.2Pragmatics, (im)politeness and conventionalization: The case of the n-word
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 September 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.294.10hau
References
Allan, Keith
2015 “When is a Slur not a Slur? The Use of Nigger in ‘Pulp Fiction’.” Language Sciences 52 (1): 187–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert
2008 “Against (Gricean) Intentions at the Heart of Human Interaction.” Intercultural Pragmatics 5 (2): 229–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy
2015 We are not Amused: Failed Humor in Interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bilmes, Jack
1993 “Ethnomethodology, Culture, and Implicature: Toward an Empirical Pragmatics.” Pragmatics 3 (4): 387–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blitvich, Pilar Garcés-Conejos
2010 “A Genre Approach to the Study of Im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics 2 (1): 46–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Introduction: Face, Identity and Politeness. Looking Backward, Moving Forward: From Goffman to Practice Theory.” Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1): 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
1987 “Indirectness and Politeness in Requests: Same or Different ?” Journal of Pragmatics 11: 131–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bousfield, Derek, and Alison Johnson
2007 “When Respect is Impolite: The Pragmatic Uses of Naming Strategies in Confrontational Institutional Talk.” Paper presented at the Third Symposium on Politeness, University of Leeds, 2–4 July 2007.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011a Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b “Politeness and Impoliteness.” In Pragmatics of Society, ed. by Karin Aijmer, and Gisle Andersen, 393–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 “Impoliteness Strategies.” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob Mey, 421–445. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Michael Haugh
2014 Pragmatics and the English Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eelen, Gino
2001 A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria
1998 “Politeness: A Relevant Issue for Relevance Theory.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 45–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor
1984 Social Cognition. 7th ed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1972 Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1956 “Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies.” American Journal of Sociology 61 (5): 420–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond Jr.
1999 Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1956 “Embarassment and Social Organisation.” American Journal of Sociology 62: 264–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grainger, Karen
2011 “ ‘First Order’ and ‘Second Order’ Politeness: Institutional and Intercultural Contexts.” In Discursive Approaches to Politeness, ed. by LPRG, 167–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Of Babies and Bath Water: Is there any Place for Austin and Grice in Interpersonal Pragmatics?” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 27–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3. Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael
2003 “Anticipated versus Inferred Politeness.” Multilingua 22 (4): 397–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007a “The Co-constitution of Politeness Implicature in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 84–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b “The Discursive Challenge to Politeness Theory: An Interactional Alternative.” Journal of Politeness Research 3 (2): 295–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 “The Place of Intention in the Interactional Achievement of Implicature.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jacob Mey, 45–85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013 “Im/politeness, Social Practice and the Participation Order.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 52–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “‘Just kidding’: Teasing and Claims to Non-serious Intent.” Journal of Pragmatics 95: 120–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield
2012 “Mock Impoliteness, Jocular Mockery and Jocular Abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1099–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Dániel Z. Kádár
2017 “Intercultural (Im)politeness.” In Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 601–632. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
1994 “Jocular Abuse Patterns in Mixed-group Interaction.” Wellington Working Papers in Linguistics 6: 26–55.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
2002 “Over the Edge? Subversive Humor between Colleagues and Friends.” Humor 15(1): 65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine
2011 Leadership, Discourse and Ethnicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, Meredith Marra, and Bernadette Vine. 2012
Politeness and Impoliteness in Ethnic Varieties of New Zealand English ” Journal of Pragmatics44 (9): 1063–1076.DOI logo
Holmes, Janet, and Stephanie Schnurr
2005 “Politeness, Humour and Gender in the Workplace: Negotiating Norms and Identifying Contestation.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 121–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yan
2007 Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jary, Mark
1998 “Relevance Theory and the Communication of Politeness.” Journal of Pragmatics 30 (1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1979 “Technique for Inviting Laughter and its Subsequent Acceptance-Declination.” In Everyday Language. Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 79–95. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
2004 “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene Lerner, 13–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh
2013 Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Pavel Rychly, Pavel Smrz, and David Tugwell
2004 “The Sketch Engine.” In Proceedings of the EURALEX Conference, 105–116. Lorient, France.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1973 “The Logic of Politeness; or Minding your P’s and Q’s.”Chicago Linguistics Society 9: 292–305.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey N.
1983 Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2003 “An Anatomy of Politeness in Communication”International Journal of Pragmatics 14: 101–123.Google Scholar
2007 “Politeness: Is there an East-West Divide?” Journal of Politeness Research3 (2): 167–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Gene
2013 “On the Place of Hesitating in Delicate Formulations: A Turn-Constructional Infrastructure for Collaborative Indiscretion.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 95–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 “Interactional Biases in Human Thinking.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction: Expressions and Implications of the Social Bias in Human Intelligence, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 221–260. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalised Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Locher, Miriam A.
2006 “Polite Behaviour within Relational Work. The Discursive Approach to Politeness” Multilingua25 (3): 249–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Politeness Research from Past to Future, with a Special Focus on the Discursive Approach.” In New Perspectives on (Im)Politeness and Interpersonal Communication, ed. byLucía Fenandez-Amaya, Maria de la O. Hernandez-Lopez, Reyes Gomez Moron, Manuel Padilla Cruz, Manuel Mejias Borrero, and Marianna Relinque Barranca, 1–22. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
2015“Interpersonal Pragmatics and its Link to (Im)politeness Research” Journal of Pragmatics86: 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam A., and Derek Bousfield
2008 “Introduction: Impoliteness and Power in Language.” In Impoliteness in Language, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam Locher, 1–13. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Locher, Miriam, and Richard Watts
2005 “Politeness Theory and Relational Work.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob
2001 Pragmatics. Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mills, Sara
2003 Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwoye, Onuigbo
1992 “Linguistic Politeness and Socio-cultural Variations of the Notion of Face.” Journal of Pragmatics 18 (4): 309–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, Eva
2009 On Apologising in Negative and Positive Politeness Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owen, Marion
1983 Apologies and Remedial Interchanges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984 “Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D.
2004 “The Sequential Organisation of Explicit Apologies in Naturally Occurring English.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (3): 291–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P.
2017 “Pragmatic Competence and Pragmatic Variation.” In Doing Intercultural Pragmatics: Cognitive, Linguisticand Sociopragmatic Perspectives on Language Use, ed. by Rachel Giora, and Michael Haugh, 315–333. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1975 “Indirect Speech Acts.” In Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3. Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry Morgan, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen
2005 “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 95–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition:2nd ed. Oxford, U.K. and Cambridge, U.S.A. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina
2001 “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A Frame-based Approach.” PhD diss. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
2005a “Beyond the Micro-level in Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 1 (2): 237–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005b “Pragmatic Correlates of Frequency of Use: The Case for a Notion of ‘Minimal Context’.” In Reviewing Linguistic Thought: Converging Trends for the 21st Century, Sophia Marmaridou, Kiki Nikiforidou, and Eleni Antonopoulou. 209–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny
1995 Meaning in Interaction. An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
van der Bom, Isabelle, and Sara Mills
2015 “A Discursive Approach to the Analysis of Politeness Data.” Journal of Politeness Research 11 (2): 179–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J.
2003 Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2018 “The Interface between Pragmatics and Conversation Analysis.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 59–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2018 “Discourse Pragmatics: Communicative Action Meets Discourse Analysis.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 33–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2018 "Sociolinguistics vs pragmatics: Where does the boundary lie?” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 11–32. doi:DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
2018 “Translation studies and pragmatics”. In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 143–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia
2018 “Pragmatics vs Rhetoric: Political Discourse at the Pragmatics-Rhetoric Interface.” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 85–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal R.
2018 “Narrative Studies versus Pragmatics (of Narrative).” In Pragmatics and Its Interfaces, ed.by Cornelia Ilie and Neal R. Norrick, 122–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 32 other publications

Albuquerque, Rodrigo & Tauane Matos
2023. Fica empoderada lá na cozinha: metapragmáticas misóginas no league of legends. Traços de Linguagem - Revista de Estudos Linguísticos 6:1 DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 32:4 ► pp. 489 ff. DOI logo
Andersson, Marta
2023. E-mpoliteness – creative impoliteness as an expression of digital social capital. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 DOI logo
Archer, Dawn, Karen Grainger & Piotr Jagodziński
2020. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Politeness in Professional Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 311], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne & Georgeta Cislaru
2021. Communication et intercompréhension : regards croisés de la pragmatique interculturelle et de la pragmatique contrastive. Langages N° 222:2 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Baider, Fabienne H., Georgeta Cislaru & Chantal Claudel
2020. Researching Politeness: From the ‘Classical’ Approach to Discourse Analysis … and Back. Corpus Pragmatics 4:3 ► pp. 259 ff. DOI logo
Bączkowska, Anna
2021. “You’re too thick to change the station” – Impoliteness, insults and responses to insults on Twitter. Topics in Linguistics 22:2 ► pp. 62 ff. DOI logo
Despot, Kristina Š., Ana Ostroški Anić & Tony Veale
2023. “Somewhere along your pedigree, a bitch got over the wall!” A proposal of implicitly offensive language typology. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:2 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Fukushima, Saeko
2024. Japanese politeness revisited: from the perspective of attentiveness on Twitter. Journal of Politeness Research 0:0 DOI logo
Grainger, Karen
2023. Norms and Normativity in Indirectness Across Cultures. In Advancing (Im)politeness Studies [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Haugh, Michael
2022. (Nie)grzeczność w dyskursie. tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs :16 (2022) ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
House, Juliane & Dániel Z. Kádár
2021. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, DOI logo
Landone, Elena
2022. What Do Speech Acts Offer as Discursive Practices?. In Methodology in Politeness Research [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Landone, Elena
2022. Where is Politeness?. In Methodology in Politeness Research [Advances in (Im)politeness Studies, ], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara, Anna Bączkowska, Chaya Liebeskind, Giedre Valunaite Oleskeviciene & Slavko Žitnik
2023. An integrated explicit and implicit offensive language taxonomy. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 19:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Norrick, Neal R.
2018. Narrative studies versus pragmatics (of narrative). In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Paternoster, Annick
2022. Introduction. In Historical Etiquette, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pizziconi, Barbara
2024. Im/politeness research – what it says on the tin? (Not quite). Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Põldvere, Nele, Rachele De Felice & Carita Paradis
2022. Advice in Conversation, DOI logo
Reiter, Rosina Márquez
2021. How can ethnography contribute to understanding (im)politeness?. Journal of Politeness Research 17:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2023. How Can I Help You? Exploring Face in a Corpus of Telephone Interpreting. Corpus Pragmatics 7:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sifianou, Maria
2024. Dangerous politeness? Understandings of politeness in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Journal of Politeness Research 20:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Spokoiny, Ohala & Zohar Livnat
2022. Dialogic language and meta-language in a conflictual discourse. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 837 ff. DOI logo
Tobback, Els
2020. La modestie à la française à travers l’acte de l’éloge de soi. Analyse comparative français / américain des procédés pragmatiques de modification utilisés dans les résumés Linkedin. Travaux de linguistique n° 79:2 ► pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Tong, Ying & Chaoqun Xie
2022. Complaining, teasing, and meme-framing. Internet Pragmatics 5:1 ► pp. 66 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2023. Chapter 4. On the rise of a marker of disaffiliation from Others’ discourse. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Vaughan, Elaine
2023. Politeness in Irish English. In The Oxford Handbook of Irish English, ► pp. 448 ff. DOI logo
Vekarić, Gordana & Ivana Trbojević-Milošević
2020. Discourse of discipline: Communicative strategies in coaches' speech. Fizicka kultura 74:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Vismans, Roel
2023. Chapter 16. Address and politeness. In It's different with you [Topics in Address Research, 5], ► pp. 397 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Na
2022. Sinkeviciute, Valeria: Conversational humour and (im)politeness: a pragmatic analysis of social interaction . Journal of Politeness Research 18:2 ► pp. 451 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2018. The interface between pragmatics and internet-mediated communication. In Pragmatics and its Interfaces [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 294], ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Grace & Ming-Yu Tseng
2020. Attitudes towards elastic language in Australian online healthcare information. Internet Pragmatics 3:1 ► pp. 34 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.