Cover not available
Part of
The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres
Edited by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 307] 2019
► pp. 1–17

Introduction

| Bar-Ilan University Israel
| Augsburg University Germany
Article outline
  • 1.Ordinariness and ethnomethodology
  • 2.Ordinariness and positioning theory
  • 3.Ordinariness and genre theory
  • 4.Mediated ordinariness
    • This volume
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.307.01wei
References
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Bernhard Giesen
1987 “Introduction.” In The Micro-Macro Link, Jeffrey C. Alexander et al. (eds.), 1–42. Berkley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bayat, Asef
2013 Life as Politics. How Ordinary People Change the Middle East. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhaya Nair, Rukmini
2017 “Famous Politicians, Infamous Progeny: Being Ordinary Onscreen when you are a dynastic Heir Apparent in the Indian Context.” Paper presented at the IPrA conference, Belfast.
Boyd, Michael S.
2014 “(New) Participatory Framework on YouTube? Commenter Interaction in US Political Speeches.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 46–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cap, Piotr and Ursula Okulska
(eds.) 2013 Analyzing Genres in Political Communication. Theory and Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Ancona, Matthew
2017 Post Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré
1990 “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
1995 Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
1998 “Political Discourse in the Media: An Analytical Framework.” In Approaches to Media Discourse, ed. by Allan Bell and Peter Garret, 142–162. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita
2000 “Negotiating Validity Claims in Political Interviews.” Text & Talk 20(4): 1–46.Google Scholar
2002 “ ‘Put bluntly, you have something of a credibility problem’. Sincerity and Credibility in Political Interviews.” In Politics as Talk and Text: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse, ed. by Paul Chilton and Christina Schäffner, 173–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Minister, we will see how the public judges you”. Media References in Political Interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 38(2): 180–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “ ‘Well if that had been true that would have been perfectly reasonable’: Appeals to Reasonableness in Political Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39(8): 1342–1359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Political Interviews and Responsibility: A Case Study of its Interactional Organization.” In Responsibility in Discourse and the Discourse of Responsibility, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman and Anna Solin, 163–196. Equinox: Sheffield.Google Scholar
2018 “And you know, Jeremy, my father came from a very poor background indeed”: Collective Identities and the Private-Public Interface in Political Discourse. In The Discursive Construction of Identities in Online and Offline Contexts: Personal – Group – Collective, ed. by Birte Bös, Sonja Kleinke, Sandra Mollin and Nuria Hernandez, 227–247. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Lawrence Berlin
(eds.) 2015 The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Peter Bull
2013 “Political Interviews in Context.” In Analyzing Genres in Political Communication, ed. by Piotr Cap and Urzula Okulska, 73–99. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
2018 “ ‘What I would say to John and everyone like John is …’: The Construction of Ordinariness Through Quotations in Mediated Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 29(5): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1994 Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Goebel, Zane
2016 “Represented Speech: Private Lives in Public Talk“. Pragmatics 26(1): 51–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New-York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
1992 “Contextualization and Understanding.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, , 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
1996 “The Linguistic and Cultural Relativity of Inference. In Rethinking lLnguistic Relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Steven.C. Levinson, , 374–406. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J.
2003 “Response Essay.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan Eerdmans et al., 105–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harré, Rom and Luk van Langenhove
(eds) 1999 Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar
2013 “Mediated Performatives.” In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren and Jan-Ola Östman, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela and Andreas Jucker
2011 “Private and Public Mass Media Communication: From Letters to the Editor to Online Commentaries.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1422–1434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
1979 “Activity Types and Language“. Language 17: 365–399.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Sonja and Peter Lunt
1994 Talk on Television. Audience Participation and Public Talk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luckmann, Thomas
1995 “Interaction Planning and Intersubjective Adjustment of Perspectives by Communicative Genres.” In Social Intelligence and Interaction, ed. by Ester Goody, 175–188. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yoshiko
2015 “The Power of the Ordinary.” Journal of Pragmatics 86: 100–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1984 “On Doing ‘Being Ordinary.” In Structures of Social Action, ed. by Max Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John
2010 Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2007 “Lay and Expert Voices in Public Participation Programmes: A case of Generic Heterogeneity“. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1420–1435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, Paul
2003 “Contextualization and Social Meaning-Making Practices.” In Language and Interaction. Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. by Susan L. Eerdmans et al., 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tolson, Andrew
1991 “Televised Chat and the Synthetic Personality“. In Broadcast Talk, ed. by Paddy Scannell, 176–200. London: Sage.Google Scholar
2006 Media Talk: Spoken Discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
1980 Macrostructures. Hillsdale: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Waller, James E.
2007 Becoming Evil. How Ordinary People Commit Genocide and Mass Murder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith, Cliff Bowan and Andrew Kakabadse
2007 Extraordinary Performance from Ordinary People. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda
1998 “Individual Intentions and Collective Purpose: The Case of News Interviews”. In Dialogue Analysis VI, ed. by Svetla Cmejrkovà, Jana Hoffmanovà, Olga Müllerovà and Jindra Svetlà, 269–280. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Weizman, E.
2003 “News Interviews on Israeli Television: Normative Expectations and Discourse Norms”. In Dialogue Analysis 2000, ed. by Sorin Stati and Marina Bondi, 383–394. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda
2006 Roles and Identities in News Interviews: The Israeli context. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 154–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Political Irony: Constructing Reciprocal Positioning in the News Interview”. In: Fetzer, Anita(ed.). The Pragmatics of Political Discourse: Explorations across Cultures, 167–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 “Ami et Ennemi, Frère et Déserteur : une Grille de Positionnements Complexes”. Argumentation et Analyse du Discours 12. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita Fetzer
(eds.) 2015 Follow-Ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across Contexts and Discourse Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weizman, Elda and Anita, Fetzer
2018 Constructing Ordinariness in Online Journals: A Corpus-Based Study in the Israeli Context. Israel Studies in Language and Society 11(1), 23–48. Google Scholar
Winter, Joanne
(1993) Gender and the Political Interview in an Australian Context. Journal of Pragmatics 20, 117–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Fetzer, Anita
2022. Doing things with discourse in the mediated political arena. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 769 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda & Zohar Livnat
2022. Dialogic meaning-making in political settings. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 731 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.