Cover not available
Part of
Bonding through Context: Language and interactional alignment in Japanese situated discourse
Edited by Risako Ide and Kaori Hata
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 314] 2020
► pp. 17–38

Chapter 1
Shifting bonds in suspect interrogations

A focus on person-reference and modality

| Aichi University
In this paper I will examine a series of police interrogations in which various “bonding” strategies – typically linguistic “modality” and “person reference” in Japanese – are employed. The prosecution process in Japan is notorious for unduly allowing the police to extend the detention period while various types of ploys and threats can be attempted to make a suspect to confess to the accused crime. Although such “bonding” between a suspect and the police may sound like a misleading characterization, one can expect to find comparable features to what we typically observe in “bonded” relationships. I will examine how the bond between a suspect and interrogators, established in an inhumane environment called daiyō-kangoku ‘police detention cell,’ can be modified in the interrogation process.
Keywords: forensic linguistics, suspect interrogation, wrongful conviction, person reference, modality
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
  • 3.Data and object of analysis
    • 3.1Data in focus
    • 3.2Linguistic items in focus
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Distribution of the particle and interjective use of ne, yo, and na
    • 4.2Distribution of ninshōshi ‘person-reference terms’
      • 4.2.1Substitution of jishōshi ‘first person/self-reference terms’
      • 4.2.2Substitution of taishōshi ‘second-person-reference terms’
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 3 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.314.01kat
References (48)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1970. On Revolution. New York, NY: Penguin.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1990. The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Albert Gilman. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity.” In Language and Social Context, ed. by Pier Giglioli, 252–282. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Conley, John, and William M. O’Barr. 1998. Just Words: Law, Language and Power. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cook, Haruko M. 1992. “Meanings of non-referential indexes: A case of the Japanese sentence-final particle ne.” Text, 12(4): 507–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm. 1994. “Powerful Evidence for the Defense: An Exercise in Forensic Discourse Analysis.” In Language and the Law, ed. by John Gibbons, 414–427. London and NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, and Alison Johnson (eds). 2010. The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eades, Diana. 2012. “ Intercultural Communication in the Law.” In The Handbook of Intercultural Discourse and Communication, ed. by Christina Paulston, Scott Kiesling, and Elizabeth Rangel, 408–429. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, Kathleen. 1991. “Accommodation in Therapy.” In Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics, ed. by Howard Giles, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland, 187–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujita, Masahiro, Kōichi Hioki, and Kōsuke Wakabayashi. 2016. “‘Watashi’ ka, ‘ore’ ka, ‘boku’ ka: Kyōjutsu chōsho ni okeru ichi-ninshō ga hyōka ni ataeru eikyō [‘Watashi,’ ‘ore,’ or ‘boku’: The effects of first person pronouns in written statements on evaluations of the accused in a criminal case].” Conference Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Law and Psychology.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M., and Evangeline M. Varonis. 1991. “ Miscommunication in Nonnative Speaker Discourse.” In Miscommunication and Problematic Talk, ed. by Nikolas Coupland, Howard Giles, and John M. Wiemann, 121–145. California: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Justine Coupland, and Nikolas Coupland (eds). 1991. Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gotō, Sadato. 1996. “Jihaku chōsho to kōhan bengo: Torishirabe no tēpu rokuon to jihaku no nin’isei [Written confessions and public defense proceedings: Tape-recordings of interrogations and voluntary confessions].” In Keiji-Tetsuzuki no Saizensen [State-of-the-art Criminal Case Procedures], ed. by Osamu Watanabe, 22–57. Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Kōyasanhōka jiken: Abakareta gishō [The Koyasan Temple complex arson case: A false charge debunked].” In Torishirabe no Kashika e [Toward the Visualization of Police Interrogation], ed. by Makoto Ibusuki, 108–128. Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
Grebler, Gillian. 2010. “A Jihadi Heart and Mind?: Strategic Repackaging of a Possibly False Confession in an Anti-terrorism Trial in California.” In The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, and Alison Johnson, 315–332. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. “Law and Morality.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Value, Delivered at Harvard University, October 1 and 2, 1986, retrieved from [URL]
Hamada, Sumio. 2006. Jihaku ga Mujitsu wo Shoumei Suru: Hakamada Jiken, Sono Jihaku no Shinrigaku-teki Bunseki [Confession Proves Innocence: An Analysis of the Psychological Deposition of Confession in the Hakamada Case]. Tokyo: Kitaooji-Shobo.Google Scholar
Harris, Sandra. 2011. “ Interrogation and Evidence: Questioning Sequences in Courtroom Discourse and Police Interviews.” In Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions, ed. by Christopher N. Candlin, and Srikant Sarangi, 277–298. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hashiuchi, Takeshi, and Shûgo Hotta (eds). 2012. Hō to Gengo: Hōgengogaku eno Izanai. [Law and Language: Introduction to Forensic Linguistics]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishing.Google Scholar
Hotta, Shûgo. 2010. Hō Kontekusuto no Gengo Riron [Linguistic Theories of Judicial Contexts]. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
. 2011. “Shihou kontekusuto ni okeru komyunikēshon nouryoku [Communicative competence in legal contexts].” In Komyunikeshon Nouryoku no Shosou [Aspects of Communicative Competence], ed. by Kuniyoshi Kataoka, and Keiko Ikeda, 289–307. Tokyo: Hituzi Shobo.Google Scholar
Hotta, Shûgo, and Kōichi Hioki. 2016. “Shōhyō no kishaku-ka ni kansuru shinri-gengogaku-teki kōsatsu [A psycholinguistic analysis of trademark dilution].” The Bulletin of Arts and Sciences (Meiji University) 515: 1–12.Google Scholar
Ibusuki, Makoto (ed). 2011. Torishirabe no Kashika e [Toward the Visualization of Police Interrogation]. Tokyo: Nihon Hyōronsha.Google Scholar
(ed). 2016. Higisha Torishirabe Rokuga Seido no Saizensen [The State of the Art in Visual-recording of Suspect Interrogation]. Kyoto: Hōritsu-bunka-sha.Google Scholar
Ishizuka, Nobuhisa. 2020. “Why Is Carlos Ghosn Afraid of the Japanese Justice System?” New York Times, Jan. 16, 2020. [URL]
Irvine, Judith, and Susan Gal. 2000. “Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. by Paul Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Komter, Martha. 2013. “Conversation Analysis in the Courtroom.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 612–629. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1988. “The Judicial Testing of Linguistic Theory.” In Language in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding, ed. by Deborah Tannen, 159–182. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Loftus, Elizabeth F. 1979. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Loftus, Elizabeth F., and Palmer, John C. 1974. “Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction between Language and Memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 135: 585–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miyazaki, Kazuto, Taro Adachi, Harumi Noda, and Shino Takanashi. 2002. Shin-nihongo Bunpō Sensho [The New Handbook of Japanese Linguistics], Vol. 4. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishing.Google Scholar
Mori, Naohisa. 2001. “Aru keiji-jiken no kyoujutsu shiryou ni okeru sakuseisha douitsusei no shinrigakuteki kentou [A Psychological Examination on the Author’s Identity in Criminal Case Documents].” Journal of the Society of Humanities (Sapporo Gakuin University) 69: 13–36.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Ikuyo. 2007. “Saiban’in o Ikanishite Giron ni Hikikomu ka, [How to Involve Citizen Judges in Discussion].” The Horitsu Jiho 791: 117–122.Google Scholar
Namnyak, M., N. Tufton, R. Szekely, M. Toal, S. Worboys, and Elizabeth L. Sampson. 2007. “Stockholm Syndrome: Psychiatric Diagnosis or Urban Myth? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2007: 1–8.Google Scholar
Nihongo Kijutsu Bunpō Gakkai (ed). 2003. Gendai Nihongo Bunpō 4, Dai 8-bu, Modaritī [The Modern Japanese Grammar, 4, Section 8, Modality]. Tokyo: Kuroshio Publishers.Google Scholar
O’Barr, William M. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Odanaka, Toshiki. 1993. Enzai wa Koushite Tsukurareru. [This is How Wrongful Convictions Are Made]. Tokyo; Kodansha.Google Scholar
Ogino, Tsunao. 2007. “Nōto: Saikin no Tokyo kinpen no gakusei no jishōshi no keikou. [Research note: Recent trends in university students’ use of self-reference terms in the greater Tokyo area].” Keiryō Kokugogaku 25(8): 371–374.Google Scholar
Ōgawara, Mami. 1998. “Hougengogaku no taidou. [The birth of forensic linguistics].” In Hō Shakaigaku no Shin-chihei [New Horizon in Sociology of Law], ed. by Japanese Society of Sociology of Law, 226–236. Tokyo: Yūhikaku.Google Scholar
Oguro, Kazuaki, Kazuyoshi Takase, Mitsuyo Satō, and Miyuki Satō. 2003. Kyōjutsu Chōsho Sakusei no Jitsumu: Keihōhan [Practical Guide to Writing Deposition: Criminal Cases]. Tokyo: Jitsumuhōki.Google Scholar
Osumi, Magdalena. 2020. “Japanese Justice: Innocent until Proven Guilty or Innocent until Detained?” The Japan Times, Feb. 2, 2020. [URL]
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50(4): 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Satō, Hiroshi. 2011. “Ashikaga Jiken no torishirabe tēpu ga oshieru torishirabe no gijutsu. [Interrogation techniques observed in tape-recorded data from the Ashikaga Case].” Nihon Hōgaku 764: 1129–1262.Google Scholar
Shudo, Sachiko. 2005. “Shohyo no futsuu meishi-ka mondai ni okeru gengogakuteki ronten: Wookuman jiken o daizai ni [A linguistic analysis of trademark genericization: A Study of the Austrian “Walkman” decision].” The Japanese Journal of Language in Society 7(2): 14–24.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger W. 1996. Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, Linguistic Categories and Cultural Description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. by Keith H. Basso, and Henry A. Selby, 11–55. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takao. 1878. Kotoba to Bunka [Language and Culture]. Tokyo: Iwanani Shoten.Google Scholar