Chapter published in:
The Dynamics of Text and Framing Phenomena: Historical approaches to paratext and metadiscourse in English
Edited by Matti Peikola and Birte Bös
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 317] 2020
► pp. 289–307

Chapter 12
Paratext, information studies, and Middle English manuscripts

| University of Washington
Investigations of paratextual elements can be approached methodologically from the vantage of information science. Information structure (the organization of information on the clausal and sentence level) is connected to the discipline of linguistics, and information design (the ways that a text presents material in its layout or appearance) derives from website construction and digital humanities. Although they stem from different disciplinary conversations and contexts, information structure and design collectively provide tools for examining aspects of text on the manuscript page, and drawing upon these analytic rubrics rather than the more traditional rubrics of manuscript studies serves to highlight new features and put manuscript work in closer conversation with present-day visual and textual analysis. This investigation draws upon illustrative examples from the Middle English Brut Chronicle to examine how the structural and graphical choices of the late Middle English manuscript page work together to organize and structure information, and examines the terminological and interpretative distinctions between different analytical frameworks.
Keywords: paratext, peritext, information structure, information design, information science, ordinatio , layout, Brut , Chronicle
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The framework of information studies
  • 3. Peritextual structure and information studies in manuscripts of the Brut
    • 3.1Introduction to the Brut Chronicle
    • 3.2Headings
    • 3.3Paraph marks
    • 3.4Clause structure marking of given and new information
    • 3.5Ruling
  • 4.Analytic models
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Primary sources
  • Secondary sources
Published online: 18 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.317.12moo
References

Primary sources

Brie, Friedrich W. D.
(ed) (1906, 1908) The Brut, or The Chronicles of England. 2 vols. The Early English Text Society, os 131, 136. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ed The Brut, or The chronicles of England Edited from Ms. Raw. B171 Bodleian Library, &c., by Friedrich W. D. Brie, with introduction, notes, and glossary. Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse http://​name​.umdl​.umich​.edu​/APG1531

Secondary sources

Adams, Robert
1995 “Langland’s ‘Ordinatio’: The ‘Visio’ and the ‘Vita’ Once More.” The Yearbook of Langland Studies 8: 51–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Guyda
2015 “Coding Continental: Information Design in Sixteenth-Century English Vernacular Manuals and Translations.” Renaissance Studies 29: 78–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, Paul, and Romedi Passini
1992 Wayfinding: People, Signs, and Architecture. Ontario: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bertin, Jacques
1983 Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Beymer, David, Daniel M. Russell, and Peter Z. Orton
2005 “Wide vs. Narrow Paragraphs: An Eye Tracking Analysis.” In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3585, ed. by Maria F. Costabile, and Fabio Paternò, 741–752. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birke, Dorothee, and Birte Christ
2013 “Paratext and Digitized Narrative: Mapping the Field.” Narrative 21 (1): 65–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brie, Friedrich W. D.
1906 (ed). The Brut, or the Chronicles of England. London: Early English Text Society by Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar
Bryan, Elizabeth J.
2009 “Rauner Codex MS 003183: The Beeleigh Abbey Brut at Dartmouth College.” The Journal of the Early Book Society 12: 207–244.Google Scholar
Butterfield, Ardis
1996 “Mise-En-Page in the Troilus Manuscripts: Chaucer and French Manuscript Culture.” Huntington Library Quarterly: A Journal for the History and Interpretation of English and American Civilization 58 (1): 49–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The Chronicles of England
Book of the month: University of Glasgow special collections. http://​special​.lib​.gla​.ac​.uk​/exhibns​/month​/sep2001​.html
de Hamel, Christopher
2001 The British Library Guide to Manuscript Illumination: History and Techniques. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Drucker, Johanna
2014 Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi
2007 Information structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Murray J.
1985 “ Ordinatio and Narrative Links: The Impact of Malory’s Tales as a ‘Hoole Book.’” In Studies in Malory, ed. by James W. Spisak, 29–52. Kalamazoo: Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University.Google Scholar
Furnish, Shearle
1990 “The Ordinatio of Huntington Library, MS HM 149: An East Anglian Manuscript of Nicholas Love’s Mirrour .” Manuscripta 34 (1): 50–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genette, Gérard
1997 [1987] Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Jane E. Lewin, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Norman D.
1984 “The Canterbury Tales as Compilatio .” Proceedings of the Illinois Medieval Association 1: 28–47.Google Scholar
Horn, Robert
1998 Visual Language: Global Communication for the 21st Century. Bainbridge Island, WA: MacroVU Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Robert
(ed) 1999 Information Design. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Ian
2015 “From Nicholas Love’s Mirror to John Heigham’s Life: Paratextual Displacements and Displaced Readers.” In Discovering the Riches of the Word: Religious Reading in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. by Sabrina Corbellini, Margriet Hoogvliet, and Bart Ramakers, 190–212. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Joel
2012 Designing Information: Human Factors and Common Sense in Information Design. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Keiser, George R.
1991 “ Ordinatio in the Manuscripts of John Lydgate’s Lyf of Our Lady: Its Value for the Reader, Its Challenge for the Modern Editor .” In Medieval Literature: Texts and Interpretation, [Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies: 79], ed. by Tim W. Machan, 139–157. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Edward D.
1989 “Chronicles and Other Historical Writing.” In A Manual of the Writings in Middle English 1050–1500, vol. 8, ed. by Albert E. Hartung. New Haven, CT: The Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2009 “The Consequences of the Loss of Verb-Second in English: Information Structure and Syntax in Interaction.” English Language and Linguistics 13 (1): 97–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 A Historical Syntax of English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Kevin
1960 Image of the City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Malamed, Connie
2009 Visual Language for Designers: Principles for Creating Graphics that People Understand. Beverly, MA: Rockport Publishers.Google Scholar
Marvin, Julia
2014 “ ‘It is to harde for my lernyng’: Making Sense of Annotations in Brut Manuscripts.” Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures 3 (2): 304–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marx, William
2006 “Reception and Revision in the Middle English Prose Brut .” Trivium 36: 53–69.Google Scholar
Marx, William, and Raluca Radulescu
2006 “Introduction, Readers and Writers of the Prose Brut.” Trivium 36: xiii–xvi.Google Scholar
Matheson, Lister M.
1998 The Prose Brut: The Development of a Middle English Chronicle. Tempe, AZ: Medieval & Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli, María J. López-Couso, and Bettelou Los
(eds) 2012 Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Linne R., and Lister M. Matheson
2003 “The Beryn Scribe and his Texts: Evidence for Multiple-Copy Production of Manuscripts in Fifteenth-Century England.” The Library 7th ser. 4: 347–370. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Colette
2020 “Information Design and Information Structure in the Middle English Prose Brut .” In Message and Medium: English Language Practices Across Old and New Media, ed. by Caroline Tagg, and Mel Evans, 261–280. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Morse, Mary
1999 “Seeing and Hearing: Margery Kempe and the Mise-En-Page .” Studia Mystica 20: 15–42.Google Scholar
Parkes, Malcolm B.
1976 “The Influence of the Concepts of Ordinatio and Compilatio on the Development of the Book.” In Medieval Learning and Literature: Essays Presented to Richard William Hunt, ed. by Jonathan J. G. Alexander, and Margaret T. Gibson, 115–141. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Peikola, Matti
2008 “Aspects of Mise-En-Page in Manuscripts of the Wycliffite Bible.” In Medieval Texts in Context, ed. by Graham D. Caie, and Denis Renevey, 28–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2013 “Guidelines for Consumption: Scribal Ruling Patterns and Designing the Mise-En-Page in Later Medieval England.” In Manuscripts and Printed Books in Europe 1350–1550: Packaging, Presentation and Consumption, ed. by Emma Cayley, and Susan Powell, 14–31. Liverpool, England: Liverpool UP.Google Scholar
2015 “Manuscript Paratexts in the Making: British Library MS Harley 6333 as a Liturgical Compilation.” In Discovering the Riches of the Word: Religious Reading in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. by Sabrina Corbellini, Margriet Hoogvliet, and Bart Ramakers, 44–67. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rouse, Richard H., and Mary A. Rouse
1992 “ Ordinatio and Compilatio Revisited.” In Ad Litteram: Authoritative Texts and Their Medieval Readers, [Notre Dame Conferences in Medieval Studies 3], ed. by Mark D. Jordan, and Kent Emery Jr., 113–134. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Martin, Fernande
1990 Semiotics of Visual Language. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Shedroff, Nathan
1999 “Information Interaction Design: A Unified Field Theory of Design.” In Information Design, ed. by Robert Jacobson, 267–292. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Martin
1991 “The Towneley Plays Manuscripts (HM1): Compilatio and Ordinatio.” Text 5: 157–173.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Robeert P.
1984 “On the History of the Verb-Second Rule in English.” In Historical Syntax, ed. by Jacek Fisiak, 575–592. Paris: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Andrew
2002 Textual Situations: Three Medieval Manuscripts and Their Readers. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Kemenade, Ans, and Marit Westergaard
2012 “Syntax and Information Structure: Verb-Second Variation in Middle English.” In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, ed. by Anneli Meurman-Solin, María J. López-Couso, and Bettelou Los, 87–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wakelin, Daniel
2014 Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Designing English: Early Literature on the Page. Oxford: Bodleian Library, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, and Betty Birner
2004 “Information Structure and Non-Canonical Syntax.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 153–174. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ward, Gregory, Betty Birner, and Rodney Huddleston
2002 “Information Packaging.” In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ed. by Rodney Huddleston, and Geoffrey K. Pullum, 1363–1447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar