Part of
By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective
Louis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen and Johan Vanparys
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 33] 1995
► pp. 159174
Cited by (33)

Cited by 33 other publications

O’Dowd, Niamh A
2024. The potential of creative uses of metonymy for climate protest. Discourse & Society 35:3  pp. 360 ff. DOI logo
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Niamh A. O’Dowd
2023. Code Red for Humanity: Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Noncommercial Advertisements on Environmental Awareness and Activism. Metaphor and Symbol 38:3  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Loader, James-Alfred
2023. Water metaphors and polyvalence in the Book of Proverbs. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 79:2 DOI logo
Thomou, Paraskevi & Marilena Koutoulaki
2022. From usage patterns to meaning construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2  pp. 305 ff. DOI logo
Coschignano, Serena
2021. The semantic network of temperature. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:1  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo
Ferrerós Pagès, Carla
2021. Significats metafòrics i metonímics del mot polisèmic per a ‘cor’ en català (cor) i en francès (cœur). Revista de Filología Románica 38  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Cun
2021. The Sino–US trade war in political cartoons: A synthesis of semiotic, cognitive, and cultural perspectives. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4  pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Baş, Melike
2020. The metonymic folk model of language in Turkish. In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12],  pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Carter, Elena V. & Valentina N. Ionova
2020. “Head” Metaphors in Mechanical Engineering (Based on the English, German, French and Russian Languages). In Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 131],  pp. 1100 ff. DOI logo
Lin, Zhengjun & Shengxi Jin
2020. Metonymic and metaphoric meaning extensions of Chinese FACE and its collocations. Pragmatics and Society 11:1  pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Naciscione, Anita
2020. Chapter 11. Multimodal creativity in figurative use. In Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts [Figurative Thought and Language, 7],  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Wong, May L-Y
2020. Mechanisms of semantic change. Asian Languages and Linguistics 1:2  pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
MICHL, DIANA
2019. Metonymies are more literal than metaphors: evidence from ratings of German idioms. Language and Cognition 11:1  pp. 98 ff. DOI logo
Michl, Diana
2019. Speedy Metonymy, Tricky Metaphor, Irrelevant Compositionality: How Nonliteralness Affects Idioms in Reading and Rating. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:6  pp. 1285 ff. DOI logo
Krech, Volkhard
2018. Theory and Empiricism of Religious Evolution (THERE): Foundation of a Research Program (Part 2). Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 26:2  pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Krech, Volkhard
2024.  How religious space is constituted by means of metaphors. The Buddhist Sīmā as a semiotic case study – with special consideration of the distinction between the urban and the wilderness . Religion  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Consuelo Vásquez & Joep Cornelissen
2016. Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human Relations 69:4  pp. 915 ff. DOI logo
Thomou, Paraskevi
2016. Metaphor and metonymy interaction patterns in Modern Greek. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2  pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Schulte, Michael
2014. Kenning, metafor og metonymi – Om kenningens kognitive grunnstruktur. Edda 101:1  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Christensen, Lars Thøger & Joep Cornelissen
2013. Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future. In Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations,  pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Thøger Christensen, Lars & Joep Cornelissen
2011. Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future. Management Communication Quarterly 25:3  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Villacañas, Beatriz & Michael White
2013. Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in “Purificación García” advertising campaigns. Metaphor and the Social World 3:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
Hanks, Patrick
2010. Review of Deignan (2005): Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15:1  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Luodonpää-Manni, Milla & Johanna Viimaranta
2010. Metaphoric Expressions on Vertical Axis Revisited: An Empirical Study of Russian and French Material. Metaphor and Symbol 25:2  pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Cornelissen, Joep P.
2008. Metonymy in Language about Organizations: A Corpus‐Based Study of Company Names. Journal of Management Studies 45:1  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Cienki, Alan
2007. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics.Alice Deignan, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005, x + 236 pages, 1-58-811647-6, $132.00 (cloth).. Metaphor and Symbol 22:2  pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
María Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Paloma úbeda-Mansilla
2006. Metaphor use in a specific genre of engineering discourse. European Journal of Engineering Education 31:5  pp. 531 ff. DOI logo
Deignan, Alice & Liz Potter
2004. A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 36:7  pp. 1231 ff. DOI logo
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2003. Speaking With Forked Tongue: A Comparative Study of Metaphor and Metonymy in English and Malay Phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol 18:4  pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001. Regularity in Semantic Change, DOI logo
Yu, Ning
2000. Figurative Uses of Finger and Palm in Chinese and English. Metaphor and Symbol 15:3  pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics,  pp. 742 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.