Part of
By Word of Mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspectiveLouis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen and Johan Vanparys
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 33] 1995
► pp. 159–174
Louis Goossens, Paul Pauwels, Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn, Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen and Johan Vanparys
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 33] 1995
► pp. 159–174
Metaphonymy
The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action
Cited by (33)
Cited by 33 other publications
O’Dowd, Niamh A
2024. The potential of creative uses of metonymy for climate protest. Discourse & Society 35:3 ► pp. 360 ff. 
Hidalgo-Downing, Laura & Niamh A. O’Dowd
2023. Code Red for Humanity: Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Noncommercial Advertisements on Environmental Awareness and Activism. Metaphor and Symbol 38:3 ► pp. 231 ff.
Loader, James-Alfred
2023. Water metaphors and polyvalence in the Book of Proverbs. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 79:2
Thomou, Paraskevi & Marilena Koutoulaki
2022. From usage patterns to meaning construction. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 305 ff.
Coschignano, Serena
Ferrerós Pagès, Carla
2021. Significats metafòrics i metonímics del mot polisèmic per a ‘cor’ en català (cor) i en francès (cœur). Revista de Filología Románica 38 ► pp. 133 ff.
Zhang, Cun
2021. The Sino–US trade war in political cartoons: A synthesis of semiotic, cognitive, and cultural perspectives. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:4 ► pp. 469 ff.
Baş, Melike
2020. The metonymic folk model of language in Turkish. In Body Part Terms in Conceptualization and Language Usage [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 12], ► pp. 196 ff.
Carter, Elena V. & Valentina N. Ionova
2020. “Head” Metaphors in Mechanical Engineering (Based on the English, German, French and Russian Languages). In Integrating Engineering Education and Humanities for Global Intercultural Perspectives [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 131], ► pp. 1100 ff.
Lin, Zhengjun & Shengxi Jin
2020. Metonymic and metaphoric meaning extensions of Chinese FACE and its collocations. Pragmatics and Society 11:1 ► pp. 96 ff.
Naciscione, Anita
2020. Chapter 11. Multimodal creativity in figurative use. In Performing Metaphoric Creativity across Modes and Contexts [Figurative Thought and Language, 7], ► pp. 249 ff.
Wong, May L-Y
MICHL, DIANA
2019. Metonymies are more literal than metaphors: evidence from ratings of German idioms. Language and Cognition 11:1 ► pp. 98 ff.
Michl, Diana
2019. Speedy Metonymy, Tricky Metaphor, Irrelevant Compositionality: How Nonliteralness Affects Idioms in Reading and Rating. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 48:6 ► pp. 1285 ff.
Krech, Volkhard
2018. Theory and Empiricism of Religious Evolution (THERE): Foundation of a Research Program (Part 2). Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft 26:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Krech, Volkhard
2024.
How religious space is constituted by means of metaphors. The Buddhist
Sīmā
as a semiotic case study – with special consideration of the distinction between the urban and the wilderness
. Religion ► pp. 1 ff.
Schoeneborn, Dennis, Consuelo Vásquez & Joep Cornelissen
2016. Imagining organization through metaphor and metonymy: Unpacking the process-entity paradox. Human Relations 69:4 ► pp. 915 ff.
Thomou, Paraskevi
2016. Metaphor and metonymy interaction patterns in Modern Greek. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 299 ff.
Schulte, Michael
2014. Kenning, metafor og metonymi – Om kenningens kognitive grunnstruktur. Edda 101:1 ► pp. 17 ff.
Christensen, Lars Thøger & Joep Cornelissen
2013. Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future. In Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations, ► pp. 43 ff.
Thøger Christensen, Lars & Joep Cornelissen
2011. Bridging Corporate and Organizational Communication: Review, Development and a Look to the Future. Management Communication Quarterly 25:3 ► pp. 383 ff.
Villacañas, Beatriz & Michael White
2013. Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in “Purificación García” advertising campaigns. Metaphor and the Social World 3:2 ► pp. 220 ff.
Hanks, Patrick
2010. Review of Deignan (2005): Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Luodonpää-Manni, Milla & Johanna Viimaranta
2010. Metaphoric Expressions on Vertical Axis Revisited: An Empirical Study of Russian and French Material. Metaphor and Symbol 25:2 ► pp. 74 ff.
Cornelissen, Joep P.
2008. Metonymy in Language about Organizations: A Corpus‐Based Study of Company Names. Journal of Management Studies 45:1 ► pp. 79 ff.
Cienki, Alan
2007. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics.Alice Deignan, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005, x + 236 pages, 1-58-811647-6, $132.00 (cloth).. Metaphor and Symbol 22:2 ► pp. 195 ff.
María Roldán-Riejos, Ana & Paloma úbeda-Mansilla
2006. Metaphor use in a specific genre of engineering discourse. European Journal of Engineering Education 31:5 ► pp. 531 ff.
Deignan, Alice & Liz Potter
2004. A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics 36:7 ► pp. 1231 ff.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2003. Speaking With Forked Tongue: A Comparative Study of Metaphor and Metonymy in English and Malay Phraseology. Metaphor and Symbol 18:4 ► pp. 289 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2001. Regularity in Semantic Change,
Yu, Ning
2000. Figurative Uses of Finger and Palm in Chinese and English. Metaphor and Symbol 15:3 ► pp. 159 ff.
[no author supplied]
2006. Bibliography. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 742 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.