Part of
The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
Edited by Esther Linares Bernabéu
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 335] 2023
► pp. 173198
References
Abercrombie, David
1956Problems and Principles. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, Lucy Pickering, and Amanda Baker
2011 “Prosodic and Multimodal Markers of Humor in Conversation.” Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (2): 224–247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barger, Patricia B., and Alicia A. Grandey
2006 “Service with a Smile and Encounter Satisfaction: Emotional Contagion and Appraisal Mechanisms.” Academy of Management Journal 49 (6): 1229–1238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barron, Anne
2014Variational pragmatics. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics: Electronic Version, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barron, Anne, and Klaus P. Schneider
2009 “Variational Pragmatics: Studying the Impact of Social Factors on Language Use in Interaction.” Intercultural Pragmatics 6 (4): 425–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, Nancy D.
2009 “Responses to Failed Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (9): 1825–1836. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Responses to Incomprehensible Humor.” Journal of Pragmatics 57: 176–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, Jasmin, and Marc-Antoine Vachon
2008 “The Effects of Humour Usage by Financial Advisors in Sales Encounters.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 26 (6): 376–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
(ed.) 1981Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communicative situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Crow, Graham, Rose Wiles, Sue Heath, and Vikki Charles
2007 “Research Ethics and Data Quality: The Implications of Informed Consent.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9 (2): 83–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2007 “Joking aside: Sociopragmatic Functions of Conversational Humour in Interpersonal Communication.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap and Joanna Nijakowska, 246–268. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2008 “There Is Method in the Humorous Speaker’s Madness: Humour and Grice’s Model.” Łodz Papers in Pragmatics 4 (1): 159–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Joker in the Pack. Towards Determining the Status of Humorous Framing in Conversations.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 217–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, Willis, and Juliane House
1981Let’s Talk and Talk about It. A Pedagogic Interactional Grammar of English. München: Urban and Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M., Rachel I. Fretz, and Linda L. Shaw
2011Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César
2015The Language of Service Encounters. A Pragmatic-discursive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, Raymond
1972 “Verbal and Bodily Rituals of Greeting and Parting.” In The Interpretation of Ritual, ed. by J. S. La Fontaine, 1–38. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Flick, Uwe
2014An Introduction to Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Grandey, Alicia A.
2003 “When “the Show Must Go on”: Surface Acting and Deep Acting as Determinants of Emotional Exhaustion and Peer-rated Service Delivery.” Academy of Management Journal 46 (1): 86–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandey, Alicia A., Glenda M. Fisk, Anna S. Mattila, Karen J. Jansen, and Lori A. Sideman
2005 “Is “Service with a Smile” Enough? Authenticity of Positive Displays during Service Encounters.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 96 (1): 38–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugh, Michael, and Derek Bousfield
2012 “Mock Impoliteness, Jocular Mockery and Jocular Abuse in Australian and British English.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (9): 1099–1114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2000 “Functions of Humour in the Conversations of Men and Women.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (6): 709–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2006 “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humour and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (1): 26–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Richard A.
1980Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga
2007 “Oral Genres of Humor. On the Dialectic of Genre Knowledge and Creative Authoring.” Pragmatics 17 (2): 263–296.Google Scholar
Laver, John
1975 “Communicative Functions of Phatic Communion.” In Organisation of Behaviour in Face-to-face Interaction, ed. by Adam Kendon, Richard M. Harris, and Mary R. Key, 215–238. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1974Semantics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw K.
1923 “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning. A Study of the Influence of Language upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, ed. by Charles K. Ogden, and Ivor A. Richards, 451–510. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, INC.Google Scholar
Mattila, Anna
2000 “When Does Mood Matter? An Examination of Two Types of Hospitality Service Encounters.” Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing 7 (3): 5–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittal, Banwari, and Walfried M. Lassar
1996 “The Role of Personalization in Service Encounters.” Journal of Retailing 72 (1): 95–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nickson, Dennis, Chris Warhurst, and Eli Dutton
2005 “The Importance of Attitude and Appearance in the Service Encounter in Retail and Hospitality.” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 15 (2): 195–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolich, M. A., and B. A. Sparks
1995 “The Hospitality Service Encounter: The Role of Communication.” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 19 (2): 43–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, Neal
1993Conversational Joking. Humor in Everyday Talk. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
1994 “Involvement and Joking in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3–4): 409–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2004 “On the Social Importance of Phatic Utterances: Some Considerations for a Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” In Current Trends in Intercultural, Cognitive and Social Pragmatics, ed. by Pilar Garcés Conejos, Reyes Gómez Morón, Lucía Fernández Amaya and Manuel Padilla Cruz, 199–216. Sevilla: Research Group “Intercultural Pragmatic Studies”.Google Scholar
2005 “On the Phatic Interpretation of Utterances: A Complementary Relevance-Theoretic Approach.” Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 18: 227–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Metarepresentations and Phatic Utterances: A Pragmatic Proposal about the Generation of Solidarity between Interlocutors.” In Current Trends in Pragmatics, ed. by Piotr Cap and Joanna Nijakowska, 110–128. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2020 “Verbal Humor and Age in Cafés and Bars in Seville, Spain.” In Pragmatic Variation in Service Encounter Interactions across the Spanish-speaking World, ed. by Julio César Félix-Brasdefer and María Elena Placencia, 169–188. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2022 “Dialogical Humour in Evening Service Encounters in the Hospitality Industry in Seville, Spain.” International Review of Pragmatics 14 (2): 169–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Placencia, M. Elena
2005 “Pragmatic Variation in Corner Store Interactions in Quito and Madrid.” Hispania 88 (3): 583–598. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Entre lo institucional y lo sociable: “Conversación de contacto”, identidades y metas múltiples en interacciones en la peluquería.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 5 (1): 139–161.Google Scholar
Placencia, M. Elena, and Ana Mancera Rueda
2011 “Vaya, ¡qué chungo! Rapport-building Talk in Service Encounters: The Case of Bars in Seville at Breakfast Time.” In Spanish at Work. Analysing Institutional Discourse across the Spanish-speaking World, ed. by Nuria Lorenzo-Dus, 192–207. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pugh, S. Douglas
2001 “Service with a Smile: Emotional Contagion in the Service Encounter.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (5): 1018–1027. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, David
2005 “Frame-shifting in Humor and Irony.” Metaphor and Symbol 20 (4): 275–294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P., and Anne Barron
Slåtten, Terje, Goran Svensson, and Sander Sværi
2011 “Empowering Leadership and the Influence of a Humorous Work Climate on Service Employees’ Creativity and Innovative Behaviour in Frontline Service Jobs.” International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 3 (3): 267–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan
(ed.) 2000Metarepresentations. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
1995Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tessier, Sophie
2012 “From Field Notes, to Transcripts, to Tape Recordings: Evolution or Combination?International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11 (4): 446–460. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, George W.
1973Stylistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
van Dolen, Willemijn, Jos Lemmink, Jan Mattsson, and Ingrid Rhoen
2001 “Affective Consumer Responses in Service Encounters: The Emotional Content in Narrations of Critical Incidents.” Journal of Economic Psychology 22 (3): 359–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre
1999 “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 127–161.Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston
2019 “Pragmatics and the Challenge of ‘Non-propositional’ Effects.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 31–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2004 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Larry Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wong, Amy
2004 “The Role of Emotional Satisfaction in Service Encounters.” Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 14 (5): 365–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yus Ramos, Francisco
2016Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir
1998 “What Is Phatic Communication?” In Current Issues in Relevance Theory, ed. by Villy Rouchota, and Andreas H. Jucker, 327–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Žegarac, Vladimir, and Billy Clark
1999 “Phatic Interpretations and Phatic Communication”. Journal of Linguistics 35 (2): 321–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar