Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing

Cited by 85 other publications

No author info given

2014. Introduction. In Professional Discourse, ► pp. 1 ff.

No author info given

2019. . In Morpho-Syntactic Patterns in Spoken Korean English [Varieties of English Around the World, G62],

No author info given

2022. . In Esperanto – Lingua Franca and Language Community [Studies in World Language Problems, 10],

Abu-Liel, Aula Khatteb, Zohar Eviatar & Bracha Nir

2019. Writing between languages: the case of Arabizi. Writing Systems Research 11:2 ► pp. 226 ff.

Akkaya, Aslihan

2014. Language, Discourse, and New Media: A Linguistic Anthropological Perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass 8:7 ► pp. 285 ff.

Alcántara-Plá, Manuel

2018. Fuzzy Limits: Researching Discourse in the Internet with Corpora. In Second International Handbook of Internet Research, ► pp. 1 ff.

Alcántara-Plá, Manuel

2020. Fuzzy Limits: Researching Discourse in the Internet with Corpora. In Second International Handbook of Internet Research, ► pp. 591 ff.

Androutsopoulos, Jannis

2006. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:4 ► pp. 419 ff.

Archard, Nicole

2013. Women's participation as leaders in society: an adolescent girls' perspective. Journal of Youth Studies 16:6 ► pp. 759 ff.

Baczkowska, Anna

2020. Chapter 9. Healthy lifestyle, dieting, fitness and bodybuilding. In Complimenting Behavior and (Self-)Praise across Social Media [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 313], ► pp. 213 ff.

Baek, Mikyung & Suzanne K. Damarin

2008. Computer-Mediated Communication as Experienced by Korean Women Students in US Higher Education. Language and Intercultural Communication 8:3 ► pp. 192 ff.

Bang, EunJin & Julie A. Luft

2014. Exploring the Written Dialogues of Two First-Year Secondary Science Teachers in an Online Mentoring Program. Journal of Science Teacher Education 25:1 ► pp. 25 ff.

Baron, Naomi S.

2004. See you Online. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23:4 ► pp. 397 ff.

Bays, Hillary

2009. Visual Iconic Patterns of Instant Messaging: Steps Towards Understanding Visual Conversations. In International Handbook of Internet Research, ► pp. 41 ff.

Blattner, Geraldine & Lawrence Williams

2022. The variable use of diacritics in synchronous computer-mediated French discourse: Replication research. Journal of French Language Studies 32:2 ► pp. 216 ff.

Bleaman, Isaac L.

2020. Implicit Standardization in a Minority Language Community: Real-Time Syntactic Change among Hasidic Yiddish Writers. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3

Chen, Xinren

2016. Emailing Requests to International Researchers: The Construction of Identity by Chinese EFL Graduate Students. In Email Discourse Among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca, ► pp. 115 ff.

Chew, S. Y. & L. L. Ng

2016. The Relevance of Personality and Language Proficiency on the Participation Style of ESL Learners in Face-to-Face and Online Discussions. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 25:4 ► pp. 605 ff.

Chiluwa, Innocent

2009. The discourse of digital deceptions and ‘419’ emails. Discourse Studies 11:6 ► pp. 635 ff.

Crystal, David

2001. . In Language and the Internet,

Danet, Brenda & Susan C. Herring

2006. Introduction: The Multilingual Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9:1 ► pp. 0 ff.

Del-Teso-Craviotto, Marisol

2009. Racism and xenophobia in immigrants’ discourse: the case of Argentines in Spain. Discourse & Society 20:5 ► pp. 571 ff.

Don, Alexanne

2008. The dynamics of gender perception and status in email-mediated group interaction V1.0. Transforming Cultures eJournal 2:2

Edwards, Kristie, Simeon Yates, Anne-Florence Dujardin & Geff Green

2008. Writing Research into Professional E-Mail Communication. In Handbook of Research on Virtual Workplaces and the New Nature of Business Practices, ► pp. 364 ff.

Ehret, Katharina & Maite Taboada

2020. Are online news comments like face-to-face conversation?. Register Studies 2:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Eisenchlas, Susana A.

2013. Gender Roles and Expectations. SAGE Open 3:4 ► pp. 215824401350644 ff.

Eisenstein, Jacob

2015. Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19:2 ► pp. 161 ff.

Escandell Montiel, Daniel

2020. Twitter y las nuevas formas de cultura popular. Boletín de Literatura Oral ► pp. 123 ff.

Fahy, Patrick J.

2002. Use of Linguistic Qualifiers and Intensifiers in a Computer Conference. American Journal of Distance Education 16:1 ► pp. 5 ff.

Fitzpatrick, Noel & Roisin Donnelly

2010. Do You See What I Mean? Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. In Critical Design and Effective Tools for E-Learning in Higher Education [Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, ], ► pp. 55 ff.

Freiermuth, Mark & Douglas Jarrell

2006. Willingness to communicate: can online chat help?1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 16:2 ► pp. 189 ff.

Freiermuth, Mark R. & Hsin-chou Huang

2012. Bringing Japan and Taiwan closer electronically: A look at an intercultural online synchronic chat task and its effect on motivation. Language Teaching Research 16:1 ► pp. 61 ff.

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra

1997. Self-presentation and interactional alliances in e-mail discourse: the style- and code-switches of Greek messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2 ► pp. 141 ff.

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra

2003. Computer-mediated communication. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Gibbs, William J. & Roman S. Bernas

2008. Interactional and structural characteristics of communication and social interactions during computer-mediated communication. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 20:1 ► pp. 3 ff.

Gibbs, William J. & Ronan S. Bernas

2007. Computer-mediated-communications, learning style, and visualizing online educational conversations. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 18:2 ► pp. 25 ff.

Giordan, Marcelo

2004. Tutoring through the internet: how students and teachers interact to construct meaning. International Journal of Science Education 26:15 ► pp. 1875 ff.

Gruber, Helmut

2022. Computer-mediated communication and scholarly discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 21 ff.

Herring, Susan C.

2004. Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, ► pp. 338 ff.

Herring, Susan C.

2012. Grammar and Electronic Communication. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,

Herring, Susan C.

2022. Grammar and Electronic Communication. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Howard, Craig D., Andrew F. Barrett & Theodore W. Frick

2010. Anonymity to Promote Peer Feedback: Pre-Service Teachers' Comments in Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43:1 ► pp. 89 ff.

Hu, Xia, Jiliang Tang & Huan Liu

2014. . In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval, ► pp. 547 ff.

Hårstad, Stian

2021. 1. Digital skriving under den sosiolingvistiske lupen: Har det skjedd en språklig revolusjon?. In Morsmålsfaget som fag og forskningsfelt i Norden, ► pp. 21 ff.

Hössjer, Amelie & Kerstin Severinson Eklundh

2009. Making Space for a New Medium: On the Use of Electronic Mail in a Newspaper Newsroom. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

JACOBS, GLORIA E.

2004. Complicating contexts: Issues of methodology in researching the language and literacies of instant messaging. Reading Research Quarterly 39:4 ► pp. 394 ff.

Jordano de la Torre, María

2011. IMPROVING SPOKEN COMPETENCE BY MEANS OF MULTIMODAL ENVIRONMENTS IN A DISTANCE CONTEXT. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas 0:6

Khatteb Abu-Liel, Aula, Zohar Eviatar & Bracha Nir

2021. Arabic teenagers’ attitudes to electronic writing in Arabizi. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 5:2 ► pp. 125 ff.

Kim, Il-Hee

2014. Development of reasoning skills through participation in collaborative synchronous online discussions. Interactive Learning Environments 22:4 ► pp. 467 ff.

Kim, Il-Hee, Richard C. Anderson, Kim Nguyen-Jahiel & Anthi Archodidou

2007. Discourse Patterns During Children's Collaborative Online Discussions. Journal of the Learning Sciences 16:3 ► pp. 333 ff.

Knight, Dawn, Svenja Adolphs & Ronald Carter

2013. Formality in Digital Discourse: A Study of Hedging in CANELC. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013 [Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 1], ► pp. 131 ff.

Kong, Kenneth

2009. A comparison of the linguistic and interactional features of language learning websites and textbooks1. Computer Assisted Language Learning 22:1 ► pp. 31 ff.

Lapadat, Judith C.

2006. Written Interaction: A Key Component in Online Learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 7:4 ► pp. 0 ff.

LEANDER, KEVIN M. & KELLY K. MCKIM

2003. Tracing the Everyday 'Sitings' of Adolescents on the Internet: a strategic adaptation of ethnography across online and offline spaces. Education, Communication & Information 3:2 ► pp. 211 ff.

Levy, Philippa

2004. A methodological framework for practice-based research in networked learning. In Advances in Research on Networked Learning [Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, 4], ► pp. 43 ff.

Liang, Jennifer Yameng

2021. Understanding context in computer-mediated communication. Functions of Language 28:3 ► pp. 342 ff.

Marcoccia, Michel

2003. Parler politique dans un forum de discussion. Langage et société n° 104:2 ► pp. 9 ff.

Marcoccia, Michel

2016. Chapitre 3. Théories etméthodes pourl’analyse delacommunication numérique écrite. In Analyser la communication numérique écrite, ► pp. 49 ff.

Marcoccia, Michel

2016. Chapitre 4. Décrire lesdiscours numériquesécrits. In Analyser la communication numérique écrite, ► pp. 65 ff.

Mavers, Diane

2007. Semiotic resourcefulness: A young child's email exchange as design. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 7:2 ► pp. 155 ff.

Myers, Greg

2010. Stance-taking and public discussion in blogs. Critical Discourse Studies 7:4 ► pp. 263 ff.

Nishimura, Yukiko

2006. Linguistic Innovations and Interactional Features of Casual Online Communication in Japanese. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9:1 ► pp. 0 ff.

Pérez-Sabater, Carmen, Gemma Peña-Martínez, Ed Turney & Begoña Montero-Fleta

2008. A Spoken Genre Gets Written. Written Communication 25:2 ► pp. 235 ff.

Rampton, Ben

2000. Speech community. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

Rasulo, Margaret

2009. The Role of Community Formation in Learning Processes. In Handbook of Research on Web 2.0 and Second Language Learning, ► pp. 80 ff.

Reinhardt, Jonathon

2022. Chapter 9. Developing online language teacher identities. In Language Teacher Development in Digital Contexts [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 57], ► pp. 179 ff.

Renkema, Jan & Christoph Schubert

2018. . In Introduction to Discourse Studies,

Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep Lluís Micó, Javier Díaz-Noci, Koldo Meso & Pere Masip

2011. Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers. The International Journal of Press/Politics 16:4 ► pp. 463 ff.

Sassen, Claudia & Peter Kühnlein

2005. The Right Frontier Constraint as Conditional. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3406], ► pp. 222 ff.

SEARGEANT, PHILIP & CAROLINE TAGG

2011. English on the internet and a ‘post-varieties’ approach to language. World Englishes 30:4 ► pp. 496 ff.

Skovholt, Karianne & Jan Svennevig

2006. Email Copies in Workplace Interaction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12:1 ► pp. 42 ff.

Spagnolli, Anna & Luciano Gamberini

2007. Interacting via SMS: Practices of social closeness and reciprocation. British Journal of Social Psychology 46:2 ► pp. 343 ff.

Spilioti, Tereza

2017. Media convergence and publicness: Towards a modular and iterative approach to online research ethics. Applied Linguistics Review 8:2-3 ► pp. 191 ff.

Sveningsson Elm, Malin

2009. Language Deterioration Revisited: The Extent and Function of English Content in a Swedish Chat Room. In International Handbook of Internet Research, ► pp. 437 ff.

Tagg, Caroline & Philip Seargeant

2012. Writing systems at play in Thai-English online interactions. Writing Systems Research 4:2 ► pp. 195 ff.

Tagliamonte, Sali A.

2016. So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet. Language in Society 45:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Thelwall, Mike

2009. MySpace comments. Online Information Review 33:1 ► pp. 58 ff.

Tsiplakou, Stavroula

2022. Doing (Bi)lingualism: Language alternation as performative construction of online identities. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 361 ff.

Ulijn, J. & C.P. Campbell

1999. . In IPCC 99. Communication Jazz: Improvising the New International Communication Culture. Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (Cat. No.99CH37023), ► pp. 109 ff.

Ulijn, J.M., A. Lincke & Y. Karakaya

2001. Non-face-to face international business negotiation: how is national culture reflected in this medium. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 44:2 ► pp. 126 ff.

Vandekerckhove, Reinhild & Judith Nobels

2010. Code eclecticism: Linguistic variation and code alternation in the chat language of Flemish teenagers1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14:5 ► pp. 657 ff.

Warschauer, Mark

2007. Technology and Writing. In International Handbook of English Language Teaching, ► pp. 907 ff.

Weinstock, Jeffrey Andrew

2004. Respond Now! E-mail, Acceleration, and a Pedagogy of Patience. Pedagogy 4:3 ► pp. 365 ff.

Wodak, Ruth & Scott Wright

2006. The European Union in Cyberspace. Journal of Language and Politics 5:2 ► pp. 251 ff.

Zhang, Guangxuan, Yilu Zhou, Sandeep Purao & Heng Xu

2018. Extracting Conflict Models from Interaction Traces in Virtual Collaborative Work. In Advances in Conceptual Modeling [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 11158], ► pp. 295 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 02 february 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.