A study of migrants’ inner dialogue and its connection to social argumentation
This paper sets out to explore the relation between social argumentation and inner debate by taking into account suggestions from argumentation studies and from social and discursive psychology. It develops Dascal’s (2005) claim that there are metonymical and structural relations between the two realms of debate by substantiating it with data taken from international migrants’ inner debates at moments of difficult decisions. The data are drawn from the experience of migrating mothers who have to decide whether to go back or to remain in their host country (the UK). I show that others are present in migrants’ multivoiced decisions in two important senses: first, inner debates can be reconstructed as critical discussions (van Eemeren and Grootendorst 1984). Second, the locus from analogy has the special function of allowing the comparison between the migrant’s experience and someone else’s experience.
Keywords: Bakthin, inner debate, analogy, argumentative discourse
Published online: 01 November 2013
Cited by 14 other publications
No author info given
Baumtrog, Michael D.
Muller Mirza, Nathalie & Marcelo Dos Santos Mamed
Palmieri, Rudi, Andrea Rocci & Nadzeya Kudrautsava
Rocci, Andrea, Sara Greco, Rebecca Schär, Josephine Convertini, Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont & Antonio Iannaccone
Xenitidou, Maria & Sara Greco Morasso
Zampa, Marta & Daniel Perrin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.