Article published In:
Creativity, Cognition and Material Culture
Edited by Lambros Malafouris, Chris Gosden and Karenleigh A. Overmann
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:1] 2014
► pp. 4563
Addis, D.R., Wong, A.T. and Schacter, D.L
2007 “Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration”. Neuropsychologia 45(7): 1363–1377. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A
2007Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. and Hitch, G.J
1974 “Working memory”. In Bower, G.A. (ed.), Recent Advances in Learning and Motivation. New York: Academic Press, 47–90.Google Scholar
Balsters, J.H., Whelan, C.D., Robertson, I.H. and Ramnani, N
2013 “Cerebellum and cognition: Evidence for the encoding of higher order rules”. Cerebral Cortex 23(6): 1433–1443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbey, A.K., Colom, R., Paul, E.J. and Grafman, J
2014 “Architecture of fluid intelligence and working memory revealed by lesion mapping”. Brain Structure and Function 219(2): 485–494. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chase, W. and Simon, H
1973 “Perception in chess”. Cognitive Psychology 4(1): 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coolidge, F.L
2014 “The exaptation of the parietal lobes in Homo sapiens ”. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 921: 295–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Critchley, M
1953The Parietal Lobes. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
De Smet, H.J., Paquier, P., Verhoeven, J. and Mariën. P
2013 “The cerebellum: Its role in language and related cognitive and affective functions”. Brain and Language 127(3): 334–342. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edison, T.A
n.d. Retrieved from [URL]
Engle, R.W., Kane, M.J. and Tuholski, S.W
1999 “Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex”. In Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (eds), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 102–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K.A. and Delaney, P.F
1999 “Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance”. In Miyake, A. and Shah, P. (eds), Models of Working Memory:Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 257–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K.A. and Kintsch, W
1995 “Long-term working memory”. Psychological Review 102(2): 211–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gatewood, J
1985 “Actions speak louder than words”. In J. Dougherty (ed.), Directions in Cognitive Anthropology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 199–220.Google Scholar
Gibson, J
1986The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Gladwin, T
1970East is a Big Bird. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gobet, F
1998 “Expert memory: A comparison of four theories”. Cognition 66(2): 115–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F. and Simon, H
2000 “Five seconds or sixty? Presentation time in expert memory”. Cognitive Science 24(4): 651–682. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guida, A., Gobet, F., Tardieu, H. and Nicolas, S
2012 “How chunks, long-term working memory and templates offer a cognitive explanation for neuroimaging data on expertise acquisition: A two-stage framework”. Brain and Cognition 79(3): 221–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hambrick, D.Z., Kane, M. and Engle, R
2005 “The role of working memory in higher-level cognition: Domain specific versus domain-general perspectives”. In R. Sternberg and J. Pretz (eds.), Cognition and Intelligence: Identifying the Mechanisms of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 104–121.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E
1995Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Imamizu, H., Kuroda T., Miyauchi, S., Yoshioka, T. and Kawato, M
2003 “Modular organization of internal models of tools in the human cerebellum”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100(9): 5461–5466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, M
1993 “Movement and thought: Identical control mechanisms by the cerebellum”. Trends in Neuroscience 16(11): 448–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “Bases and implications of learning in the cerebellum—Adaptive control and internal model mechanism”. Progress in Brain Research 1481: 95–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarry, C., Osiurak, F., Delafuys, D., Chauvire, V., Etcharry-Bouyx, F. and Le Gall, D
2013 “Apraxia of tool use: More evidence for the technical reasoning hypothesis”. Cortex 49(9): 2322–2333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, C. and Keller, J
1996Cognition and Tool Use: The Blacksmith at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koenigs, M., Barbey, A.K., Postle, B.R. and Grafman, J
2009 “Superior parietal cortex is critical for the manipulation of information in working memory”. The Journal of Neuroscience 29(47): 14980–14986. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koziol, L.F., Budding, D.E. and Chidekel, D
2010 “Adaptation, expertise, and giftedness: Towards an understanding of cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar network contributions”. Cerebellum 9(4): 499–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. and Therriault, D
2013 “The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes”. Intelligence 41(5): 306–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lou, H.C., Luber, B., Crupain, M., Keenan, J.P., Nowak, M., Kjaer, T.W. and Lisanby, S.H
2004 “Parietal cortex and representation of the mental self”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(17): 6827–6832. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malafouris, L
2013How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G
1956 “The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits of our capacity for processing information”. Psychological Review 63(2): 81–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Osiurak, F., Jarry, C. and Le Gall, D
2010 “Grasping the affordances, understanding the reasoning: Toward a dialectical theory of human tool use”. Psychological Review 117(2): 517–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Privado, J., de Urturi, C.S., Dávila, J., López, C., Burgaleta, M., Román, F.J., Escorial, S. and Colom, R
2014 “White matter integrity predicts individual differences in (fluid) intelligence through working memory”. Personality and Individual Differences 601: S77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sack, A.T
2009 “Parietal cortex and spatial cognition”. Behavioural and Brain Research 202(2): 153–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schlerf, J.E., Verstynen, T.D., Ivry, R.B. and Spencer, R.M.C
2010 “Evidence of a novel somatic map in the human neocerebellum during complex actions”. Journal of Neurophysiology 103(6): 3330–3336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A
1970On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tulving, E
2002 “Episodic memory: From mind to brain”. Annual Review of Psychology 53(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E. and Vogel, E
2014 “Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval”. Cognitive Psychology 711: 1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandervert, L.R., Schimpf, P.H. and Liu, H
2007 “How working memory and the cerebellum collaborate to produce creativity and innovation”. Creativity Research Journal 19(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wellman, H.M
2014Making Minds: How Theory of Mind Develops. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J., Schoville, B.J., Brown, K.S. and Chazan, M
2012 “Evidence for early hafted hunting technology”. Science 338(6109): 942–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zappa, F
1978 “Loose talk”. Rolling Stone Magazine. San Francisco: Straight Arrow Publishers, 151.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 21 other publications

Aston, Alexander
2019. Metaplasticity and the boundaries of social cognition: exploring scalar transformations in social interaction and intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 18:1  pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
2020. How the Cycladic Islanders Found Their Marbles: Material Engagement, Social Cognition and the Emergence of Keros. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 30:4  pp. 587 ff. DOI logo
Bartolo, Angela & François Osiurak
2022. One century after Liepmann's work on apraxia: Where do we go now?. Cortex 154  pp. 333 ff. DOI logo
Batrachenko, Olexandr & Serhii Verbytskyi
2018. Scientific-innovative binomial as conceptual basis of technical perfection of designs of meat mincers and cutters. FOOD RESOURCES 6:10  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Baumard, Josselin, Mathieu Lesourd, Léna Guézouli & François Osiurak
2021. Physical understanding in neurodegenerative diseases. Cognitive Neuropsychology 38:7-8  pp. 490 ff. DOI logo
Brown, Steven & Eunseon Kim
2021. The neural basis of creative production: A cross-modal ALE meta-analysis. Open Psychology 3:1  pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Coolidge, Frederick L. & Thomas Wynn
2016. An Introduction to Cognitive Archaeology. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25:6  pp. 386 ff. DOI logo
Gintsburg, Sarali
2017. It’s got some meaning but I am not sure…. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:3  pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Herzlinger, Gadi, Thomas Wynn, Naama Goren-Inbar & Michael D. Petraglia
2017. Expert cognition in the production sequence of Acheulian cleavers at Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel: A lithic and cognitive analysis. PLOS ONE 12:11  pp. e0188337 ff. DOI logo
Motes-Rodrigo, Alba, Eva Reindl & Elisa Bandini
2020. The technical reasoning hypothesis does not rule out the potential key roles of imitation and working memory for CTC. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 DOI logo
Muller, Antoine, Ceri Shipton & Chris Clarkson
2022. Stone toolmaking difficulty and the evolution of hominin technological skills. Scientific Reports 12:1 DOI logo
Osiurak, François, Nicolas Claidière & Giovanni Federico
2023. Bringing cumulative technological culture beyond copying versus reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 27:1  pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Osiurak, François, Caroline Crétel, Natalie Uomini, Chloé Bryche, Mathieu Lesourd & Emanuelle Reynaud
2021. On the Neurocognitive Co‐Evolution of Tool Behavior and Language: Insights from the Massive Redeployment Framework. Topics in Cognitive Science 13:4  pp. 684 ff. DOI logo
Osiurak, François, Mathieu Lesourd, Jordan Navarro & Emanuelle Reynaud
2020. Technition: When Tools Come Out of the Closet. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15:4  pp. 880 ff. DOI logo
Osiurak, François & Emanuelle Reynaud
2020. The elephant in the China shop: When technical reasoning meets cumulative technological culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 DOI logo
2020. The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43 DOI logo
Reindl, E., C. Tennie, I. A. Apperly, Z. Lugosi & S. R. Beck
2022. Young children spontaneously invent three different types of associative tool use behaviour. Evolutionary Human Sciences 4 DOI logo
Vallée-Tourangeau, Gaëlle & Frédéric Vallée-Tourangeau
2017. Cognition Beyond the Classical Information Processing Model: Cognitive Interactivity and the Systemic Thinking Model (SysTM). In Cognition Beyond the Brain,  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
Wynn, Thomas
2021. Ergonomic clusters and displaced affordances in early lithic technology. Adaptive Behavior 29:2  pp. 181 ff. DOI logo
Wynn, Thomas & Frederick L. Coolidge
2016. Archeological insights into hominin cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 25:4  pp. 200 ff. DOI logo
2019. The Expert Performance Model of Neandertal Cognition. In Learning Among Neanderthals and Palaeolithic Modern Humans [Replacement of Neanderthals by Modern Humans Series, ],  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.