Article published In:
PragmaticsVol. 16:1 (2006) ► pp.103–138
The natural logic of language and cognition
This paper aims at an explanation of the discrepancies between natural intuitions and standard logic in terms of a distinction between NATURAL and CONSTRUCTED levels of cognition, applied to the way human cognition deals with sets. NATURAL SET THEORY (NST) restricts standard set theory cutting it down to naturalness. The restrictions are then translated into a theory of natural logic. The predicate logic resulting from these restrictions turns out to be that proposed in Hamilton (1860) and Jespersen (1917). Since, in this logic, NO is a quantifier in its own right, different from NOT-SOME, and given the assumption that natural lexicalization processes occur at the level of basic naturalness, single-morpheme lexicalizations for NOT-ALL should not occur, just as there is no single-morpheme lexicalization for NOT-SOME at that level. An analogous argument is developed for the systematic absence of lexicalizations for NOT-AND in propositional logic.
Keywords: Gricean maxims, Natural logic, Logical intuitions, Valuation space analysis, Natural set theory
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
References
Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper
(1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4.2: 159–219. 
Butterworth, Brian
(1999) The Mathematical Brain. London: Macmillan.
De Morgan, Augustus
(1847) Formal logic: or, the calculus of inference, necessary and probable. London: Taylor & Walton.
Dehaene, Stanislas
(1997) The number sense. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2005) Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In Stanislas Dehaene, Jean-René Duhamel, Marc D. Hauser, and Giacomo Rizzolatti (eds.), From monkey brain to human brain. A Fyssen Foundation symposium. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Dehaene, Stanislas, Véronique Izard, Pierre Pica, and Elisabeth Spelke
in press) Core knowledge of geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. Science.
Ginsburg, Herbert P., and Barbara S. Allardice
(1984) Children’s difficulties with school mathematics. In: Barbara Rogoff and Jean Lave (eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context.Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 194–219.
Hamilton, William
(1860) Lectures on Logic. Edinburgh: Blackwood & Sons.
Hoeksema, Jack
(1999) Blocking effects and polarity sensitivity. In J. Gerbrandy, M. Marx, M. de Rijke, and Y. Venema (eds.), JFAK. Essays Dedicated to Johan van Benthem on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday.Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press (not available in hard copy) [URL]
Horn, Larry R
(1989) A Natural History of Negation. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Jespersen, Otto
(1917) Negation in English and Other Languages. Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-filologiske Meddelelser I,5. Copenhagen: Andr. Fred. Høst & søn.
Kneale, William, and Martha Kneale
(1962) The Development of Logic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kratzer, Angelika
(1979) Conditional necessity and possibility. In Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli, and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, pp. 117–147.
Levinson, Stephen C
(2000) Presumptive Meanings. The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. BoP.
Pica, Pierre, Cathy Lemer, Véronique Izard, and Stanislas Dehaene
(2004) Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian indigene group. Science 306. (October 2004): 499–503.
Seuren, Pieter A.M
(1974) Negative’s travels. In Pieter A.M. Seuren (ed.), Semantic Syntax. Oxford Readings in Philosophy.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 183–208.
in prep.) Language and Logic in Cognition.
Van Fraassen, Bas
(1971) Formal Semantics and Logic. New York-London: Macmillan.
Zwicky, Arnold
(1973) Linguistics as chemistry: The substance theory of semantic primes. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt & Cy, pp. 467–485.
Cited by
Cited by 9 other publications
Cremers, Crit
2010. NL from Logic: Connecting Entailment and Generation. In Logic, Language and Meaning [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6042], ► pp. 94 ff. 
Demey, Lorenz
2015. Interactively Illustrating the Context-Sensitivity of Aristotelian Diagrams. In Modeling and Using Context [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9405], ► pp. 331 ff.
Jaspers, Dany
2015. The English Tenses, Blanché and the Logical Kite. In The Road to Universal Logic [Studies in Universal Logic, ], ► pp. 319 ff.
Katzir, Roni & Raj Singh
2013. Constraints on the lexicalization of logical operators. Linguistics and Philosophy 36:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Mondal, Prakash
2016. Toward an Architecture of the Language–Emotion Interface. In Language and Cognitive Structures of Emotion, ► pp. 111 ff.
Seuren, Pieter
2010. A Logic-Based Approach to Problems in Pragmatics. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46:4
Smessaert, Hans
2009. On the 3D Visualisation of Logical Relations. Logica Universalis 3:2 ► pp. 303 ff.
Speranza, J.L. & Laurence R. Horn
2010. A brief history of negation. Journal of Applied Logic 8:3 ► pp. 277 ff.
Speranza, J.L. & Laurence R. Horn
2012. History of Negation. In Logic: A History of its Central Concepts [Handbook of the History of Logic, 11], ► pp. 127 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.