Article published in:
Pragmatics
Vol. 31:4 (2021) ► pp. 560588
References

References

Adelaar, Willem F. H.
2013 “A Quechuan Mirative?” In Perception and Cognition in Language and Culture, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Anne Storch, 95–109. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2012 “The Essence of Mirativity.” Linguistic Typology 16(3), 435–485. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Akmajian, Adrian
1970Aspects of the Grammar of Focus in English. MIT Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea, and Emily A. Hanink
2019 “Marking Imprecision, Conveying Surprise: Like Between Hedging and Mirativity.” Journal of Linguistics 55(1), 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Birner, Betty J.
1994 “Information Status and Word Order: An Analysis of English Inversion.” Language 70(2), 233–259. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996The Discourse Function of Inversion in English. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1952 “Linear Modification.” PMLA 67(7), 1117–1144. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1969Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, and Wout Van Praet
2019 “Rethinking Predicative Clauses with Indefinite Predicate and Specificational Clauses with Indefinite Variable: A Cognitive-Functional Account.” Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 38: 1–36.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts, and Pseudo-Clefts. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delancey, Scott
1997 “Mirativity: The Grammatical Marking of Unexpected Information.” Linguistic Typology 1(1), 33–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1992Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2016The Factive–Reported Distinction in English: Representational and Interpersonal Semantics. KU Leuven Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967 “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English: Part 2.” Journal of Linguistics 3(2), 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1970A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 1st ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John
1978Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2012 “Specification, Equation, and Agreement in Copular Sentences.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 57(2), 209–240. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis R.
1979The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2005 “ It-Extraposition in English: A Functional View.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 10(2), 119–159. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
2008 “Information Structure and Grammaticalization.” In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization, ed. by Elena Seoane and María José López-Couso, 207–229. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, James
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, Line
2005Copular Clauses: Specification, Predication and Equation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea
1997The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Amanda L.
2012The English It-Cleft: A Constructional Account and a Diachronic Investigation. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen F.
1981 “Towards a Taxonomy of Given–New Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, ed. by Peter Cole, 281–297. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1992 “The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness and Information Status.” In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, ed. by William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson, 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1973 “Presuppositions.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4), 447–457. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vallduvi, Enric
1992The Informational Component. New York/London: Garland.Google Scholar
Van Praet, Wout
2019 “Focus Assignment in English Specificational and Predicative Clauses: Intonation as a Cue to Information Structure?Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51(2): 222–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2020English Specificational and Predicative Clauses: A Functional-Cognitive Account of their Representational and Textual Organisation. KU Leuven and UNamur Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Van Praet, Wout, and Gerard O’Grady
2018 “The Prosody of Specification: Discourse Intonational Cues to Setting up a Variable.” Journal of Pragmatics 135: 87–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber
2006 “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar