This study offers a multimodal analysis of turns in everyday English interactions that are used for making compliments, i.e. for positively evaluating the appearance, personal qualities or actions of (a) co-present participant(s) in the present situation. We first identify the most frequent linguistic formats recurrently occurring in compliments in our data. We then focus on the sequential interactional analysis of compliment sequences, i.e. the production of the compliment and the response it receives. While a range of bodily-visual displays and prosodic features can be identified as co-constructing compliment activity, we argue that gaze direction has a specific role in the production of both compliments and their responses. The data come from a database of approximately 8 hours of video–recorded casual face-to-face conversations in English. The study employs the methodology of conversation analysis, maintaining that social interaction in face-to-face conversations is a multimodal achievement, where participants’ use of language, embodied actions and material objects are variously combined to build coherent courses of action (Goodwin 2000). The aim of the study is to provide a description of how embodied actions enter into the design of social action formats for compliments.
(2002) Listener responses as a collaborative process: The role of gaze. Journal of Communication 521: 566-580.
(2012) On affectivity and preference in responses to rejection. In E. Kärkkäinen, and J. Du Bois (eds.), Stance, Affect, and Intersubjectivity in Interaction: Sequential and Dialogic Perspectives. Special issue of Text & Talk 32-4: 453-475.
(2012) Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. In E. Kärkkäinen, and J. Du Bois (eds.), Stance, Affect, and Intersubjectivity in Interaction: Sequential and Dialogic Perspectives. Special issue of Text & Talk 32-4: 433-451.
Du Bois, John, Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
(1993) An outline of discourse transcription. In J.A. Edwards, and M.D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding in discourse research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 45-87.
Fox, Barbara A.
(2000) Micro-syntax in conversation. Paper presented at Interactional Linguistics Conference, Spa, Belgium, September 2000.
(1992) Assessment and the construction of context. In A. Duranti, and C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 147-190. BoP
(2006) The organization of gaze and assessments as resources for stance taking. Text &Talk 26.3: 281-328. BoP
(2002) Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. Ford, B.A. Fox, and S. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.196-224.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
(2005) The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly 68.1: 15-38.
(1981) The compliment formula. In F. Coulmas (ed.), Conversational Routine: Explorations in Standardized Communication Situations and Prepatterned Speech. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 115-132.
(2004) Beyond the black box. Talk-in-Interaction in the Airline Cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate.
(2000) Linguistic functions of head movements in the context of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 321: 855-878. BoP
(2009) The embodied and negotiated production of assessments in instructed actions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42.4: 329-361.
(1978) Compliment responses. Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In J. Schenkein (ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press, pp. 79-112.
(1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 57-101.
(1986) Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 91: 219-229.
Rauniomaa Mirka, and Tiina Keisanen
(2012) Two multimodal formats for responding to requests. Journal of Pragmatics 44.6–7: 829-842.
(2013) Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell, and T. Stivers (eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 308-329.
Ruusuvuori Johanna, and Anssi Peräkylä
(2009) Facial and verbal expressions in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42.4: 377-394.
(1986) On some gestures’ relation to talk. In J.M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 266-296.
(2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
(1987) Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. BoP
Shaw, Rebecca, and Celia Kitzinger
(2012) Compliments on a home birth helpline. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45.3: 213-244. BoP
(1989) Vuoronalkuiset konnektorit: Mutta. [Turn-initial connectors: But
]. In A. Hakulinen (ed.), Suomalaisen keskustelun keinoja I. Kieli 4. Helsinki: Finnish Department, University of Helsinki, pp. 162-176.
Stivers, Tanya, and Frederico Rossano
(2010) Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43.1: 3-31. BoP
Streeck, Jürgen, Charles Goodwin, and Curtis LeBaron
(2011) Embodied interaction in the material world. An introduction. In J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron (eds.), Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-26.
Wagner, Johannes, and Rod Gardner
(2004) Introduction. In R. Gardner, and J. Wagner (eds.), Second Language Conversations. London: Continuum, pp. 1-17.
Cited by 10 other publications
2021. Complimenting on-the-go: Features from colloquial Algerian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 172 ► pp. 270 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.