Article published in:
Vol. 27:2 (2017) ► pp. 257300


Vicissitudes of laughter


Ashmore, Malcolm
1989The Reflexive Thesis: Wrighting Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ashmore, Malcom, and Darren Reed
2000 “Innocence and Nostalgia in Conversation Analysis: The Dynamic Relations of Tape and Transcript.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1 (3).Google Scholar
Ashmore, Malcolm, Katie MacMillan, and Steven D. Brown
2004 “It’s a Scream: Professional Hearing and Tape Fetishism.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 349–374. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore
1997 “The Semantic Foundations of Cognitive Theories of Humor.” Humor 10 (4): 395–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Humor and Irony in Interaction: From Mode Adoption to Failure of Detection.” In Say Not to Say: New Perspectives on Miscommunication, ed. by Luigi Anolli, Rita Cicei, and Giuseppe Riva, 159–180. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Austin, Paddy
1990 “Politeness Revisited – The Dark Side.” In New Zealand Ways of Speaking English, ed. by Allan Bell and Janet Holmes, 277–293. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri, Cloudesley Shovell Henry Brereton, and Fred Rothwell
1914Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael
2005Laughter and Ridicule: Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael, Susan Condor, Derek Edwards, Mike Gane, David Middleton, and Alan Radley
1988Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Boden, Deidre
1990 “The World as it Happens: Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis.” In Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Synthesis, ed. by George Ritzer, 185–213. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Anthony, and Hugh Foot
(eds.) 1976Humour and Laughter: Theory, Research and Applications. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall
1981 “On the Microfoundations of Macrosociology.” American Journal of Sociology 86 (5): 984–1014. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 “Interaction Ritual Chains, Power, and Property: The Micro-Macro Connection as an Empirically Based Theoretical Problem.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Münch, and Neil J. Smelser, 193–206. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul
1987 “Po-Faced Receipts of Teases.” Linguistics 25: 219–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
1991 “Transcription Design Principles for Spoken Discourse Research.” Pragmatics 1: 71–106. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino
1993 “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, ed. by Jane A. Edwards, and Martin D. Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek
1995 “Two to Tango: Script Formulations, Dispositions, and Rhetorical Symmetry in Relationship Troubles Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 28 (4): 319–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “Moaning, Whinging and Laughing: The Subjective Side of Complaints.” Discourse Studies 7 (1): 5–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel
1980 “The Eye of Power.” In Knowledge/Power: Selected Interviews & Other Writings, 1972–1977, ed. by Colin Gordon, 146–165. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund
1938 “Wit and Its Relation to the Unconscious.” In The Basic Writings of Sigmund Freud, 631–805. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
1974 “Origins of the Term ‘Ethnomethodology’.” In Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by Roy Turner, 15–18. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
1991 “Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order*, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc., in and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society, (I) – An Announcement of Studies.” In Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, ed. by Graham Button, 10–19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 “Ethnomethodology’s Program.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (1): 5–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism., ed. & introd. by Anne Warfield Rawls. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
2006Seeing Sociologically: The Routine Grounds of Social Action. Boulder, CO and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
2007 “Four Relations between Literatures of the Social Scientific Movement and their Specific Ethnomethodological Alternate.” In Orders of Ordinary Action: Respecifying Sociological Knowledge, ed. by Stephen Hester and David Francis, 13–29. Aldershot, Hampshire and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks
1970 “On the Formal Structures of Practical Action.” In Theoretical Sociology, ed. by John C. McKinney, and Edward A. Tiryakian, 338–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and D. Lawrence Wieder
1992 “Two Incommensurable, Asymmetrically Alternate Technologies of Social Analysis.” In Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology, ed. by Graham Watson, and Robert M. Seller, 175–206. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony
1984The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Phillip
1995 “Laughing at and Laughing with: Negotiation of Participant Alignments through Conversational Laughter.” In Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities, ed. by Paul ten Have, and George Psathas, 43–56. Landham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
2003Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 “Interviewer Laughs: Shared Laughter and Asymmetries in Employment Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1485–1498. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Graham, Elizabeth E., Michael J. Papa, and Gordon P. Brooks
1992 “Functions of Humour in Conversation: Conceptualization and Measurement.” Western Journal of Communication 56 (2): 161–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haakana, Markku
2001 “Laughter as a Participant’s Resource: Dealing with Delicate Aspects of Medical Interaction.” Text 21: 187–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 “Laughter in Medical Interaction: From Quantification to Analysis, and Back.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 6: 207–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haiman, John
(ed.) 1985Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, Martin
1993 “On the Essence of Truth.” In Basic Writings: From Time and Being (1927) to The Task of Thinking (1964), revised and expanded edition, ed. by David Ferrel Krell, 115–138. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
1984Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
2004 “Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders, 103–147. New York and London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
2012a “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Action Formation and its Epistemic (and Other) Backgrounds.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 551–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, Richard A.
1992The Classical Roots of Ethnomethodology: Durkheim, Weber, and Garfinkel. Chapel Hill, NC and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
2009 “Ethnomethodology and Social Theory.” In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, ed. by Bryan S. Turner, 159–178. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet
2000 “Politeness, Power and Provocation: How Humour Functions in the Workplace.” Discourse Studies 2 (2): 159–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Sharing a Laugh: Pragmatic Aspects of Humor and Gender in the Workplace.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 26–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Janet, and Meredith Marra
2002 “Having a Laugh at Work: How Humour Contributes to Workplace Culture.” Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1683–1710. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
2010 “The Last Laugh: Shared Laughter and Topic Termination.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1513–1525. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “On the Nature of “Laughables”: Laughter as a Response to Overdone Figurative Phrases.” Pragmatics 21 (3): 393–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Sandra A. Thompson
1980 “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse.” Language 56 (2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horton-Salway, Mary
1998Mind and Body in the Discursive Construction of M.E.: A Struggle for Authorship of an Illness. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian, and Robin Wooffitt
2008Conversation Analysis. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Phil, Rupert Read, and Wes Sharrock
2008There is no Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defense of Peter Winch. Aldershot, Hampshire and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1979 “A Technique for Inviting Laughter and its Subsequent Acceptance Declination.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
1984 “On the Organization of Laughter in Talk about Troubles.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 346–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1985 “An Exercise in the Transcription and Analysis of Laughter.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 25–34. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2004 “A Note on Laughter in ‘Male-Female’ Interaction.” Discourse Studies 6: 117–133. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail, Harvey Sacks, and Emanuel Schegloff
1987 “Notes on Laughter in Pursuit of Intimacy.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and John R. E. Lee, 152–205. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Jha, Prem, and Eric Hobsbawm
2006The Twilight of the Nation State: Globalisation, Chaos and War. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary
1999New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Keyton, Joann, and Stephenson J. Beck
2010 “Examining Laughter Functionality in Jury Deliberations.” Small Group Research 41 (4): 386–407. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koestler, Arthur
1964The Act of Creation: A Study of the Conscious and Unconscious in Science and Art. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Lavin, Danielle, and Douglas W. Maynard
2001 “Standardization vs. Rapport: Respondent Laughter and Interviewer Reaction during Telephone Surveys.” American Sociological Review 66 (3): 453–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lampert, Martin D., and Susan M. Ervin-Tripp
2006 “Risky Laughter: Teasing and Self-Directed Joking among Male and Female Friends.” Journal of Pragmatics 38: 51–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Kenneth
2007Husserl’s Criticism of Reason: With Ethnomethodological Specifications. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael
2012 “Revisiting the Cultural Dope.” Human Studies 35 (2): 223–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Michael, and David Bogen
1996The Spectacle of History: Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-Contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Michael, Christian Greiffenhagen, and Wes W. Sharrock
2015 “Statistical Practice: Putting Society on Display.” Theory, Culture & Society 33 (3): 51–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malešević, Siniša
2010The Sociology of War and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and John Heritage
2005 “Conversation Analysis, Doctor–Patient Interaction and Medical Communication.” Medical Education 39 (4): 428–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, Kevin
2009 “The Humanitarian Imperative under Fire.” Journal of Language and Politics 8 (3): 333–358. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Structure and Agency in Scholarly Formulations of Racism.” Human Studies 34: 67–92. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh, and Houston Wood
1975The Reality of Ethnomethodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Mulkay, Michael
1988On Humour. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pazzini, Franca
1991 “Communication Hierarchies in Humour: Gender Differences in the Obstetrical/Gynaecological Setting.” Discourse & Society 2 (4): 477–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollner, Melvin
1974 “Mundane Reasoning.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4: 35–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987Mundane Reason: Reality in Everyday and Sociological Discourse. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan
1996Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998 “Cognition as Context (Whose Cognition?).” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31 (1): 29–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn
2010 “Putting Aspiration into Words: ‘Laugh Particles’, Managing Descriptive Trouble and Modulating Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1543–1555. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, Anne Warfield
1989 “Language, Self and Social Order: A Reformulation of Goffman and Sacks.” Human Studies 12 (1/2): 147–172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rieff, David
2002A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Ruiz-Gurillo, Leonor, and M. Belén Alvarado-Ortega
(eds.) 2013Irony and Humor: From Pragmatics to Discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1992 “On Talk and its Institutional Occasions.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 101–134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1997 “Whose Text? Whose Context?Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schütz, Alfred
1967The Phenomenology of the Social World. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Sharrock, Wes
1974 “On Owning Knowledge.” In Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings, ed. by Roy Turner, 45–53. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
2004 “What Garfinkel Makes of Schutz: The Past, Present and Future of an Alternate, Asymmetric and Incommensurable Approach to Sociology.” Theory & Science. Available at http://​theoryandscience​.icapp​.org​/content​/vol5​.1​/sharrock​.html.
Sharrock, Wes, and Robert J. Anderson
1987 “The Definition of Alternatives: Some Sources of Confusion in Interdisciplinary Discussion.” In Talk and Social Organisation, ed. by Graham Button, and Robert E. Lee, 290–321. Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Simone, Raffaela
(ed.) 1994Iconicity in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. J., and P. Alston
2000International Human Rights in Context: Law, Politics, Morals, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strengers, Isabelle
2011Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts, trans. by Michael Chase. Cambridge MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Nikolas Coupland
1990 “Multiple Goals in Discourse: An Overview of Issues.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9 (1–2): 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Truong, Khiet P., and David A. van Leeuwen
2007 “Automatic Discrimination between Laughter and Speech.” Speech Communication 49: 144–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun A.
1998Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
2006 “Discourse, Context and Cognition.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Johannes, and Monika Vöge
(eds.) 2010 “Laughter in Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1469–1576.Google Scholar
Watson, Rod
1998 “Ethnomethodology, Consciousness and Self.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 5 (2): 202–223.Google Scholar
Whalen, Marylin R., and Don H. Zimmerman
1990 “Describing Trouble: Practical Epistemology in Citizen Calls to the Police.” Language in Society 19 (4): 465–492. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Thomas P.
2003 “Garfinkels’ Radical Program.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (4): 487–494. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winch, Peter
1958The Idea of a Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Winick, Charles
1976 “The Social Contexts of Humor.” Journal of Communication 26 (3): 124–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj
2011 “With Hegel beyond Hegel.” Criticism 53 (2): 295–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar