Commentary

Achieving adequacy and commitment in pragmatics

Michael Silverstein

If the thread that connects these papers one to another is the theme of violence and social struggle, they are at the same time quite diverse in approaches and subject matters. So diverse, in fact, that in order to see how they present material on violence and social struggle, we must begin by situating the variety of sociocultural material they bring to our attention in the story-lines, as it were, of their respective approaches. This grouping, or re-grouping, of the papers will, I think, lead us to seeing what is involved in giving what we might term an adequate pragmatic account of the phenomena they treat, though it is not my intention here to give an actual re-analysis of the various materials. My purpose is rather to be able to relate such criteria of adequacy to the particular commitments we have as social scientists to elucidating and thereby engaging with conditions that people more generally face in the inherent politics of sociocultural experience.

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

Published online: 01 December 1997
https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.7.4.08sil

Full-text

Commentary

References

Bateson, Gregory

(1936) Naven. Cambridge: [Cambridge] University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre

(1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. BoP

Goffman, Erving

(1979) Footing. Semiotica 25: 1-29.

BoP

Latour, Bruno

(1984) Science in action. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Mehan, Hugh

(1996) The construction of an LD student: A case study in the politics of representation. In M. Silverstein & G. Urban (eds.), Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 253-76.

Putnam, Hilary

(1975) The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Philosophical papers, vol. 2: Mind, language, and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215-71.

Silverstein, Michael

(1992) The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough? In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55-76.

Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

No author info given

2012. In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ► pp. 741 ff.

Forget, Danielle

2001. Figures, politesse et organisation textuelle. Journal of Pragmatics 33:7 ► pp. 1157 ff.

Hymes, Dell H.

1998. When is oral narrative poetry? generative form and its pragmatic conditions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 8:4 ► pp. 475 ff.

Menchik, Daniel A.

2020. Authority beyond institutions: the expert’s multivocal process of gaining and sustaining authoritativeness. American Journal of Cultural Sociology

Parmentier, Richard J.

1999. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.