Article published in:Police interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Pragmatics and Society 10:1] 2019
► pp. 9–31
Evidence-gathering in police interviews
Communication problems and possible solutions
In this paper I discuss the many complexities that police officers have to deal with in their communication with suspects. Investigative interviewing is a very complex communicative situation in itself, with a number of different psychological and sociological variables at play during each interview. In addition, suspect interviews bring about an additional dimension of complexity, which is driven by the fact that a basic principle of conversation, cooperation (Grice 1975) is often not respected and is sometimes severely and purposefully violated, for example when suspects are guilty and want to obscure that very fact or when they believe that their situation would worsen if they cooperated with the police. A further layer of complexity is added when the interviews are carried out via an interpreter, where the fact that the officer and the suspect speak different languages during the interview creates additional barriers to straightforward communication.In the present paper, I identify a number of points at which communication difficulties are encountered in this highly sensitive legal context. For this purpose, I analyse authentic interview datasets provided by two UK police constabularies, and also make comparisons with examples from transcripts of authentic US police interrogations. In addition, I highlight the issues that arise when professional interpretation is not available and when bilingual police officers assume the dual role of investigator-interpreter. Finally, I suggest possible solutions that can help remove the hurdles standing in the way of efficient and accurate gathering of communication evidence.
Keywords: complex questions, interpreting, investigative interviewing, negative questions, police interviews
Published online: 28 May 2019
Dando, Coral, Rachel Wilcock, and Rebecca Milne
De Groot, Annette M. B.
Elder, Chi-He, and Kasia Jaszczolt
Fausey, Caitlin M., and Lera Boroditsky
Filipović, Luna, and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
Filipović, Luna and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón
Filipović, Luna and Suzanne Abad Vergara
Hales, Liz, and Luna Filipović
Hayes, Alejandra, and Sandra Hale
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, and Luna Filipović
Kredens, Krysztof and Ruth Morris
Levinson, Steven C.
Meissner, Christian A., Allison R. Redlich, Stephen W. Michael, Jacqueline R. Evans, Catherine Camilletti, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Susan Brandon
Mulayim, Sedat, Miranda Lai, and Caroline Norma
Newbury, Phillip and Alison Johnson
Oxburgh, Gavin, Trond Myklebust and Tim D. Grant
2017 “The Presentation of Rights and Obligations in Police Interviews in the USA”. Multilingualism, Forensic Linguistics and the Law Conference, University of Oslo; video available at http://www.hf.uio.no/multiling/english/news-and-events/events/conferences/2017/forensic-linguistics/forensic-linguistics.html
Reese, Brian, and Nicholas Asher
Cited by 1 other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.