Article published in:
Police interviews: Communication challenges and solutionsEdited by Luna Filipović
[Pragmatics and Society 10:1] 2019
► pp. 9–31
Evidence-gathering in police interviews
Communication problems and possible solutions
Luna Filipović | University of East Anglia
In this paper I discuss the many complexities that police officers have to deal with in their communication with
suspects. Investigative interviewing is a very complex communicative situation in itself, with a number of different psychological
and sociological variables at play during each interview. In addition, suspect interviews bring about an additional dimension of
complexity, which is driven by the fact that a basic principle of conversation, cooperation (Grice 1975) is often not respected and is sometimes severely and purposefully violated,
for example when suspects are guilty and want to obscure that very fact or when they believe that their situation would worsen if
they cooperated with the police. A further layer of complexity is added when the interviews are carried out via an interpreter,
where the fact that the officer and the suspect speak different languages during the interview creates additional barriers to
straightforward communication.In the present paper, I identify a number of points at which communication difficulties are encountered in this
highly sensitive legal context. For this purpose, I analyse authentic interview datasets provided by two UK police constabularies,
and also make comparisons with examples from transcripts of authentic US police interrogations. In addition, I highlight the
issues that arise when professional interpretation is not available and when bilingual police officers assume the dual role of
investigator-interpreter. Finally, I suggest possible solutions that can help remove the hurdles standing in the way of efficient and
accurate gathering of communication evidence.
Keywords: complex questions, interpreting, investigative interviewing, negative questions, police interviews
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Relevant research on police interviews, in brief
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Data analysis: Complex and negative questions
- 4.1Complex questions
- 4.2Negative questions
- 5.Uncooperativeness
- 6.Cross-linguistic difficulties: Interpreting language differences
- 7.Conclusions and future directions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 28 May 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00013.fil
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00013.fil
References
Carston, Robyn
Dando, Coral, Rachel Wilcock, and Rebecca Milne
De Groot, Annette M. B.
Elder, Chi-He, and Kasia Jaszczolt
Fausey, Caitlin M., and Lera Boroditsky
Filipović, Luna
Filipović, Luna and John A. Hawkins
Filipović, Luna, and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
Filipović, Luna and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón
Filipović, Luna and Suzanne Abad Vergara
Gile, Daniel
Hales, Liz, and Luna Filipović
Haworth, Kate
Hayes, Alejandra, and Sandra Hale
Heydon, Georgina
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, and Luna Filipović
Kredens, Krysztof and Ruth Morris
Krouglov, Alex
Levinson, Steven C.
Linfoot-Ham, Kerry
MacWhinney, Brian
Meissner, Christian A., Allison R. Redlich, Stephen W. Michael, Jacqueline R. Evans, Catherine Camilletti, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Susan Brandon
Mulayim, Sedat, Miranda Lai, and Caroline Norma
Newbury, Phillip and Alison Johnson
Oxburgh, Gavin, Trond Myklebust and Tim D. Grant
Pavlenko, Aneta
2017 “The Presentation of Rights and Obligations in Police Interviews in the USA”. Multilingualism, Forensic Linguistics and the Law Conference, University of Oslo; video available at http://www.hf.uio.no/multiling/english/news-and-events/events/conferences/2017/forensic-linguistics/forensic-linguistics.html
Reese, Brian, and Nicholas Asher
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Filipović, Luna
Filipović, Luna
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.